* On 30.10.2009 13:30, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> maybe your uni SMTP server is mangling the message body.
There are no header you described. Everything seems normal.
### Header of mail with "bad signature"
X-Authenticated: #17130798
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+HT55pDw2H/x3W/0HU8t/R/JNs
Hi,
maybe your uni SMTP server is mangling the message body. If they do,
the headers should contain a record of the action. For example, some of
my incoming mails have the following header:
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ...
Anything to that effect in your headers?
Hi listmates,
i have a problem with mutt and gnupg. I have set the gpg-options
described here: http://WIKI.mutt.org/?MuttGuide/UseGPG
I use mutt with getmail/procmail and msmtp to receive/send mail. And i
have two mail-accounts (gmx.de and my university account).
If i send me a signed mail from
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 02:28:25PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 12 at 09:10 PM, quoth sigi:
> >If I type the command (gpg --recv-keys X) manually, it receives
> >the key correctly, and adds it to my keyring. I tried several
> >keyservers, and they all didn't catch the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, September 12 at 09:10 PM, quoth sigi:
>If I type the command (gpg --recv-keys X) manually, it receives
>the key correctly, and adds it to my keyring. I tried several
>keyservers, and they all didn't catch the key within mutt, but
>
Hi,
for some weeks now, I can't verify pgp/gpg-signed messages with mutt.
There's always the same error-message comming up:
-
gpgkeys: HTTP fetch error 7: couldn't connect: eof
gpg: Signature made Di 28 Aug 2007 12:48:39 CEST using DSA key ID
gpg: requesting key f
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 03:03:01PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> Markus Nißl wrote:
> >
> > I will do so! Thanks again.
> >
> > BTW: no "cc:" to my address necessary, I'm subscribed to this
> > list for a year now.
>
> well you're the one who has:
> Mail-Followup-To: Markus Nißl <[EMAIL PROTECTE
* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020829]:
> Markus Nißl wrote:
> >
> > I will do so! Thanks again.
> >
> > BTW: no "cc:" to my address necessary, I'm subscribed to this
> > list for a year now.
>
> well you're the one who has:
> Mail-Followup-To: Markus Nißl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [E
Markus Nißl wrote:
>
> I will do so! Thanks again.
>
> BTW: no "cc:" to my address necessary, I'm subscribed to this
> list for a year now.
well you're the one who has:
Mail-Followup-To: Markus Nißl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
set.
perhaps you want 'subscribe mutt-users' in
Hi David!
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 08:35:31PM -0700, David Ellement wrote:
> On 020828, at 22:31:13, Markus Nißl wrote
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:48:17PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> > > And the conversion isn't necessary now because you can
> > > recognize an old-style message with esc-P [...]
>
Hey Gregor!
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 11:33:20PM +0200, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> Hi Markus,
> * Markus Nißl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [27. Aug. 2002]:
> > On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:21:52PM +0200, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> > > > Well, do I have to use that gpg-2comp in order to use gpg
> > > > with mutt?
>
Hello Justin!
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 06:06:38PM -0400, Justin R. Miller wrote:
>
> > > S/MIME? Don't you mean PGP/MIME?
> >
> > Well, I only copied that part from Justin's tutorial.
>
> Oops! I will fix that in the revision (when I get it out...)
Okay. At the end of your tutorial, you refer
On 020828, at 22:31:13, Markus Nißl wrote
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:48:17PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> > And the conversion isn't necessary now because you can
> > recognize an old-style message with esc-P [...]
>
> Why can't mutt do that for me?
It can, if you're willing to wait. I have this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Markus Ni?l on Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:31:13PM +0200:
> > S/MIME? Don't you mean PGP/MIME?
>
> Well, I only copied that part from Justin's tutorial.
Oops! I will fix that in the revision (when I get it out...)
> > And the conversion isn't n
Hi David!
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:48:17PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> %
> % On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 05:32:59PM -0400, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> % >
> ...
> % > See my guide at the URL below.
> %
> % Thanks a lot for the link! Good introduction, but I missed the
> % "procmail recipe to rewrite
Hi Markus,
* Markus Nißl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [27. Aug. 2002]:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:21:52PM +0200, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> > > Well, do I have to use that gpg-2comp in order to use gpg
> > > with mutt?
> >
> > You need this wrapper script if and only if you want to
> > communicate signed+e
Markus, et al --
...and then Markus Nißl said...
%
% On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 05:32:59PM -0400, Justin R. Miller wrote:
% >
...
% > See my guide at the URL below.
%
% Thanks a lot for the link! Good introduction, but I missed the
% "procmail recipe to rewrite old-style inline PGP messages as
%
Hi Gregor!
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:21:52PM +0200, Gregor Zattler wrote:
>
> > Well, do I have to use that gpg-2comp in order to use gpg
> > with mutt?
>
> You need this wrapper script if and only if you want to
> communicate signed+encrypted with a person who uses pgp2.6.x
So, in order to b
Hi Justin!
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 05:32:59PM -0400, Justin R. Miller wrote:
>
> > I have recently installed gnupg-1.0.7 and I'd like to use it
> > with mutt. But I can't use gnupg with mutt out of the box:
> > the muttrc has to modified to tell mutt explicitely the
> > different commands to sign
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Markus Ni?l on Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 04:38:26PM +0200:
> I have recently installed gnupg-1.0.7 and I'd like to use it with
> mutt. But I can't use gnupg with mutt out of the box: the muttrc has
> to modified to tell mutt explicitely the different
Hi Markus,
* Markus Nißl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [25. Aug. 2002]:
> Hi mutt experts!
>
> I have recently installed gnupg-1.0.7 and I'd like to use it with
> mutt. But I can't use gnupg with mutt out of the box: the muttrc
> has to modified to tell mutt explicitely the different commands
> to sign and
Hi mutt experts!
I have recently installed gnupg-1.0.7 and I'd like to use it with
mutt. But I can't use gnupg with mutt out of the box: the muttrc
has to modified to tell mutt explicitely the different commands
to sign and encrypt, etc. Where can I find such a setup for
gnupg?
I know, mutt-1.4
Am 11.09.2001 (18:21) schrieb Ben Jones:
> > I still get an error message saying 'PGP signature could NOT be
> > verified.'
> Try this line in your .muttrc . . .
> set pgp_good_sign="^gpg: Good signature from"
I am using a german environment, it works well with
set pgp_good_sign="^gpg: Korrekt
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 12:33:51AM +0200, Björn Lindström wrote:
> I am using Mutt 1.3.20i and GnuPG 1.0.6.
>
> My problem is that when i view a message, like this;
>
> ---
>
> [-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed Sep 12 00:26:53 2001) --]
> gpg: encrypted with 1024-bit ELG-E key, ID 6CAD
> I still get an error message saying 'PGP signature could NOT be
> verified.'
Try this line in your .muttrc . . .
set pgp_good_sign="^gpg: Good signature from"
--
-Ben Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.superutility.net/
PGP signature
I am using Mutt 1.3.20i and GnuPG 1.0.6.
My problem is that when i view a message, like this;
---
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed Sep 12 00:26:53 2001) --]
gpg: encrypted with 1024-bit ELG-E key, ID 6CAD430E, created 2001-09-11
"Björn Lindström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
gpg:
26 matches
Mail list logo
