Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:51:00:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: Well, every high school in north america would have you think that without a start button, a computer is completely useless and broken. I'm pretty sure that the school I went to still has those 286 Siemens machines with

Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-30 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 10:16:13:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus: In Computer Science I spent two terms on creating a website on something dealing with new media (okay, surfing all the time and hacking it together in 1/2 day before deadline). Others

Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-30 Thread Simon White
30-Mar-02 at 10:26, Rocco Rutte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : No! I was writing about schools. At _school_ others were told how to use Word and Works. Our teacher really asked us what we want to do the last two two years in Computer Science. So we decided _not_ to learn how to use MS Office.

Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-30 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:36:41:AM + Simon White wrote: Computer courses should teach about computers, not some proprietary software guff. Doesn't have to be programming, but how about file systems, and troubleshooting procedures? Troubleshooting is part of what I think makes most

OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-29 Thread Shawn McMahon
Just to throw a little fuel on the fire: Look in the Sun training catalog, at how they define the products themselves. Solaris 8 Operating Environment. Look at their web page: http://www.sun.com/solaris/ They call it the same thing. Then do a uname -a on a Solaris 8 system: SunOS chtsjs01

Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-29 Thread David Champion
* On 2002.03.29, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], * Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SunOS 5.8 is a component of the Solaris operating environment. Guess what OS stands for? SunOS 5.8 is the KERNEL, not the operating environment. That's not actually true. SunOS refers to the kernel and

Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-29 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what David Champion said on Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:58:32PM -0600: No, not really. It's marketing. The definition of OS isn't marketing, it's Computer Science. It's been presented. It agrees with what I said. Get over it. msg26387/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-29 Thread David Champion
* On 2002.03.29, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], * Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: begin quoting what David Champion said on Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:58:32PM -0600: No, not really. It's marketing. The definition of OS isn't marketing, it's Computer Science. It's been presented. It

Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-29 Thread Mike Schiraldi
No, not really. It's marketing. The definition of OS isn't marketing, it's Computer Science. It's been presented. It agrees with what I said. Get over it. Okay, i think this argument is finished. I'll summarize: Some people believe that the Operating System is the kernel plus the

Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-29 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--1LKvkjL3sHcu1TtY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus: In Germany there's a campaign running to connect every school to the internet. IIRC, Microsoft and Compaq are involved by