On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 06:18:05PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 08:26:16PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
Perhaps I've overlooked the facility. Is there a way to test the
shell environment in .muttrc? Basically an "if" statement.
I enter mutt in several wa
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 06:18:05PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
I think there may be an internal way as well, but one option would be to
set an env var (e.g., TYPE) depending on the type of session, and then
do something like (untested):
source ~/.mutt/colors.${TYPE:-default}
See also
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 08:26:16PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> Perhaps I've overlooked the facility. Is there a way to test the
> shell environment in .muttrc? Basically an "if" statement.
>
> I enter mutt in several ways (direct, aliases, shell scripts,
> functio
Perhaps I've overlooked the facility. Is there a way to
test the shell environment in .muttrc? Basically an "if"
statement.
I enter mutt in several ways (direct, aliases, shell scripts,
functions, etc) and from several devices. My smart phone
needs a different color scheme than
Test
Re-sending this to see if it is a reliable repro case.
On 2018-10-27 16:53, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > Oh, I feel the itch again. Ow-ow, it's unbearable! I must scratch,
> >
> > Has anyone tried to verify Derek's GPG signature on his message?
>
> Checking, checking, checking gently,
> Why it
tion on some of the hosts handling the outbound traffic. Yes,
> I suspect amavis more than the other pieces; it should be the only piece
> that takes apart the MIME structure.
My Received headers match what you posted for the "Test number two"
email, and all the signatures verify for
On 2018-10-28 04:19, Claus Assmann wrote:
> > RGH!! I am losing my mind!!
>
> Hopefully it's backed up somewhere...
;-)
> If you kept a copies of the mails which you originally sent
> and which you got back: what's the "diff"?
Indeed I have kept a file copy. The diff confirms my
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2018-10-27 18:23, Claus Assmann wrote:
> > Just FYI: both test mails passed verification for me.
> RGH!! I am losing my mind!!
Hopefully it's backed up somewhere...
> Here are the intermediate Received headers of th
On 2018-10-27 18:23, Claus Assmann wrote:
> Just FYI: both test mails passed verification for me.
RGH!! I am losing my mind!!
Here are the intermediate Received headers of the 2nd test mail as it
came back to me. Can you share the ones in your copy?
Received: from localhost (localh
On 2018-10-27 17:19, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Ok, that worked. Now let's try this:
> This line ends with a couple of dangling spaces.
>
> Now _that_ would be really stupid!
And so it is - that one failed :-(
The best available conclusion is that at one the the hops on osuosl.org,
mails get
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018, Ken Moffat wrote:
> 3. Neither the post you were asking about, nor either of your tests,
> passed verification here.
Just FYI: both test mails passed verification for me.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 05:19:23PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2018-10-27 16:53, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > > Oh, I feel the itch again. Ow-ow, it's unbearable! I must scratch,
> > >
> > > Has anyone tried to verify Derek's GPG signature on his message?
> >
> > Checking, checking,
On 2018-10-27 16:53, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > Oh, I feel the itch again. Ow-ow, it's unbearable! I must scratch,
> >
> > Has anyone tried to verify Derek's GPG signature on his message?
>
> Checking, checking, checking gently,
> Why it fails, that beats me.
> Bad sigs rub so unpleasantly.
>
On 2018-10-27 10:25, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Oh, I feel the itch again. Ow-ow, it's unbearable! I must scratch,
>
> Has anyone tried to verify Derek's GPG signature on his message?
Checking, checking, checking gently,
Why it fails, that beats me.
Bad sigs rub so unpleasantly.
Let us check my
Hi!
It's about urlview not doing the work, and I'd like to see if my Mutt:
Mutt 1.6.2 (2016-07-01)
...
System: Linux 4.7.2-hardened-r1-160906 (x86_64)
ncurses: ncurses 6.0.20150808 (compiled with 6.0)
libidn: 1.33 (compiled with 1.32)
...
Compiler:
Using built-in specs.
...
OK! I got creative and pretty much re-write my ~/.mutt/gpg.rc, ct now
contains the following:
# vim: syntax=muttrc
# -*-muttrc-*-
# These settings are from /usr/share/doc/mutt-1.5.21-r1/samples/gpg.rc
#
set pgp_sign_as=0xD5B20C0C
#set pgp_sign_as=0x6748EE46C7D11FB8DA89E4AEECD9A84D5B20C0C
#set
at the end of pasted blocks. This test
| program is to help diagnose the problem.
|
| Note that screen has bce support (I'm using TERM=screen-bce), but
| I sometimes get spaces at the end of lines in it (at least when
| switching window). The problem seems to come from screen, though.
| I
Sorry: trying to understand why my posts do not get through!
--
[Why use Win$ozz (I say) if ... even a fool can do that. \\?//
Do something you aren't good at! (as Henry Miller used to say)] (°|°)
Regards, Ennio. )=(
I'm testing whether posts to mutt-users are still generating
challenge-response messages.
test message ...
I have setup lists in my mutt, but whenever I use it I dont seem to get
the message back to my mail server, normal email works fine and 'r' use
to work fine aswell, even if I did have to change the address manually.
humm ...
pgpl2dqLxPPh6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
There is this
Mail client test file v0.5 (55kb): This mbox file triggers some bugs
and has very long field values to trigger buffer overflows.
at http://kmail.kde.org/mail-client-QA.gz . Mutt doesn't crash, but
shows only 18 mails whereas kmail shows 20. I guess that has to do
Volker Kuhlmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
Mail client test file v0.5 (55kb): This mbox file triggers some bugs
and has very long field values to trigger buffer overflows.
at http://kmail.kde.org/mail-client-QA.gz . Mutt doesn't crash, but
shows only 18 mails whereas kmail shows 20
Michael Tatge wrote:
From bla [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 15 20:37:05 2000
X-From_: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 15 20:36:34 2000
Subject: HTML only
Guess it does not recognize the two ^From_ lines because of the special
format. All other ^From_ lines look like this:
Mutt expects the address
Hi mutt-users,
I've installed mutt and exim for the first time and I don't know where to test them .
So, excuse me if I disturb you with that .
mutt-user newbie
bye,
mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, excuse me for a test mail
with Mutt and Exim
As I don't where to send a echo -mail
bye ,
from me [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with bash.
Consider following screenshot:
mail $ test -f ./sluzebni/; echo $?
testing if an ordinary file ./sluzebni/ exists
1
no.
mail $ test -d ./sluzebni/; echo $?
testing if ./sluzebni/ is a directory.
0
yes.
mail $ ll
total 332
-rw-rw-r--1 matejmatej
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 12:29:09AM -0400, Joel Hammer wrote:
I don't know how to make mutt distinguish between pdf and word (doc)
documents. They both show up as octet stream. So, I am trying to put a test
command into my mailcap file to test which type of file is attached, doc or
pdf. I am
In my ~/.mailcap, I have
text/html; netscape %s; nametemplate=%s.html; test=ps -C X 1/dev/null 2/dev/null
It seems that Mutt translates the uppercase
ps -C ...
to lowercase
ps -c ...
Anyone have solution for this? I'm running Mutt-1.2.5i.
--
William Park, Open Geometry
I don't know how to make mutt distinguish between pdf and word (doc)
documents. They both show up as octet stream. So, I am trying to put a test
command into my mailcap file to test which type of file is attached, doc or
pdf. I am not having much luck, so I think I need some help.
Here is my
I keep getting bounced off of lists, just checking
Hurm, not received any mail since 02/11...
--
+---+
| Jerome De Greef | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
+-+[EMAIL PROTECTED]| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
I am just a test mail
Please ignore me...
me too :)
* root ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I am just a test mail
Please ignore me...
Rafael.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| Rafael Alexandre Schmitt|
| Blumenau - Santa Catarina - Brasil |
| Powered by Debian 2.2 (Potato) |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Received Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 06:16:00PM + from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rafael A .
Schmitt)
me too :)
* root ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I am just a test mail
Please ignore me...
ok - so everythings working fine.
thnx
--
Random Fortune Message :
Linux - The way to fly so high!
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 12:42:59AM +0300, Mikko H?nninen wrote:
Jan Houtsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 03 Aug 2000:
Only thing that works is manually unsetting $DISPLAY.
Having $DISPLAY defined usually means that there's an X session running.
Why do you have it defined anyway (in that
Hi!
from my mailcap:
text/html; netscape %s; test=RunningX
text/html; lynx %s
text/html; lynx -dump %s; copiousoutput
Where can i find a decent RunningX script?
What i want is to run netscape only when i run mutt locally on my pc at home
within the window manager. However when i
want it to start netscape but lynx or w3m.
Testing only $DISPLAY isn't good enough cause when i telnet to house
it's still set to :0. And also X is found to be a running process because
at home i only locked my screen.
So i am looking for a way to test if i am running mutt really locally.
I
.
So i am looking for a way to test if i am running mutt really locally.
I have the same situation, except that I run mutt on my workstation at
work and telnet from home. I use the RunningX program available from
http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/mutt/autoview/RunningX.c
I
Never mind my stupid question. I just found a line DISPLAY=:0.0 in
my /etc/zshenv file which always (so also at a telnet session)
sets the DISPLAY variable, which caused netscape to start instead of
lynx or w3m when, from mutt, i visited an url in a telnet window.
I appologize and close this
Jan Houtsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 03 Aug 2000:
Only thing that works is manually unsetting $DISPLAY.
Having $DISPLAY defined usually means that there's an X session running.
Why do you have it defined anyway (in that telnet session) if you're not
doing stuff from inside an X
I've been fooling around with gpg and having some trouble with it. Can
anyone tell me if this message is showing up as properly signed? I may
have revoked this key, I'm not sure.
thanks
PGP signature
know what happens when you try to
sign with a revoked key. Why don't you whip up a test key, revoke it,
and then try it?
% thanks
HTH HAND
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune
Hi,
Dale Morris typed:
I've been fooling around with gpg and having some trouble with it. Can
anyone tell me if this message is showing up as properly signed? I may
have revoked this key, I'm not sure.
Yup, it's properly signed:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Tue Jul 18 16:06:23
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 12:02:53AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...so it can be tested if an X-server is running. What is this program
RunningX ? Is it an utility that comes with X (it is not on my
machine), or a simple script in bash or so (a test about a variable
like $TERM) ?
It's a C
Gary Johnson:
...so it can be tested if an X-server is running. What is this program
RunningX ? Is it an utility that comes with X (it is not on my
you might consider just using standard "/usr/bin/test -n $DISPLAY". no
need for special programs, if you test the existenc
Hi,
clemensF typed:
you might consider just using standard "/usr/bin/test -n $DISPLAY". no
need for special programs, if you test the existence of the x- variable
used to indicate, well, the display to use.
No it's different. If you're in a console while X is running, the
Run
Mrinal Kalakrishnan:
No it's different. If you're in a console while X is running, the
RunningX test will fail, because it actually tries to open the
display. Whereas the $DISPLAY variable still exists, so "test -n
$DISPLAY" test passes. So if you're in a console, while X
Mrinal Kalakrishnan:
No it's different. If you're in a console while X is running, the
RunningX test will fail, because it actually tries to open the
display. Whereas the $DISPLAY variable still exists, so "test -n
isn't there some other way (a unix way) for trying to open the x- di
On 2000.06.19, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"clemensF" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mrinal Kalakrishnan:
No it's different. If you're in a console while X is running, the
RunningX test will fail, because it actually tries to open the
display. Whereas the $DISPLAY variable still
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 03:04:19AM +0200, clemensF wrote:
isn't there some other way (a unix way) for trying to open the x- display?
is one of the standard /dev/* devices associated with an x- display?
no (there's a socket associated with it, but the location and permissions
vary from one
On 2000-06-12 15:46:03 +1000, CaT wrote:
Which version of mutt should I try to see if I can
reporduce this? I've noticed there have been
official-looking patches about and wanna see if I can
get this to happen again.
I think we have already been reproducing what you
describe, and there are
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 09:17:48AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 2000-06-12 15:46:03 +1000, CaT wrote:
Which version of mutt should I try to see if I can
reporduce this? I've noticed there have been
official-looking patches about and wanna see if I can
get this to happen again.
I
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 11:53:51PM +1000, CaT wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 11:43:22AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 2000-06-05 10:29:16 +1000, CaT wrote:
Before attempt:
-%-Mutt: /tmp/damien.work [Msgs:5492 New:12 Old:1176 Post:1 36M]---(reverse-
After attempt:
Hi CaT!
On Mon, 05 Jun 2000, CaT wrote:
I had both /tmp and /var/spool/mail filled up. I selected two msgs for
deletion as well as read one document. It would not let me quit. I
trie dit multiple times. I freed up space on /var/spool/mail so that it
has 160meg free and it still would not
On 2000-06-05 10:29:16 +1000, CaT wrote:
Before attempt:
-%-Mutt: /tmp/damien.work [Msgs:5492 New:12 Old:1176 Post:1 36M]---(reverse-
After attempt:
---Mutt: /var/spool/mail/damien.work [Msgs:5038 New:9 Old:1074 Post:1 34M]--
What precisely did happen between these two versions of
the
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 11:43:22AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 2000-06-05 10:29:16 +1000, CaT wrote:
Before attempt:
-%-Mutt: /tmp/damien.work [Msgs:5492 New:12 Old:1176 Post:1 36M]---(reverse-
After attempt:
---Mutt: /var/spool/mail/damien.work [Msgs:5038 New:9 Old:1074
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 07:29:53PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
CaT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, 04 Jun 2000:
Ok.. NOW I'm using 1.2. Grr. Compiled 1.2, went to play
with my bros on their nintendo, came back and forgot I
didn't install :)
And the result of trying to re-create the
test
--
/helfman
"At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always
been in your possession."
Fingerprint: 2F76 2856 776A 3E07 9F3E 452A 17D9 9B28 D75E 0A36
GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org Get Private! 1024D/D75E0A36
test
--
// [EMAIL PROTECTED] //
testing testing 1 to 3
--
/helfman
"At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always beenin
your possession."
Fingerprint: 2F76 2856 776A 3E07 9F3E 452A 17D9 9B28 D75E 0A36
GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org Get Private!
--
-jm
test - please ignore
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 01:25:38PM +0100, John Poltorak wrote:
test - please ignore
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
I'm not sure what I've changed but, I've suddenly got Mutt
actually sending out mail.
This has been a real struggle, but it looks as though
elm is getting very close
On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 01:30:50PM -0400, kiss the sun and walk on air wrote:
The documentation for MIME references a script called RunningX for use
with the test parameter in the .mailcap file. Where may one find this?
http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/mutt/autoview/RunningX.c
I suppose
65 matches
Mail list logo
