On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think this would be a relatively simple thing to do. I guess I'm
going to try to build MySQL with the config options instead of invoking at
runtime...both versions seem hopelessly confused.
Well, I rebuilt and installed 5.0 again using cust
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Kevin F. O'Riordan wrote:
Hi James,
If I telnet to port 3306, I get the old version as I should and when
I telnet to the new port I get the new version as I should, but if I
do a:
mysqladmin -P (new port) variables
I get the old variables.
I'd suspect mysqladmin's using
Possible duplicate, sorry if so.
Schema below.
I am trying to select from a many-to-many relationship all edition_ids that
have records for, and only for, certain run_id values. I have no idea how to
do this outside of a subquery, which I'd rather avoid.
Any thoughts? Here's what I have now,
Hi James,
> If I telnet to port 3306, I get the old version as I should and when
> I telnet to the new port I get the new version as I should, but if I
> do a:
>
> mysqladmin -P (new port) variables
>
> I get the old variables.
I'd suspect mysqladmin's using the unix socket, and ignoring your "-
>>Thanks for the suggestion--is that essentially using
>>http://www.php.net/posix_mkfifo within PHP?
>>
> [JS] Yes, that's what I had in mind. Be warned, though: I've never used this
> from PHP; and, although I found no references to this in the PHP
> documentation, I couldn't find the POSIX functi
Hi:
I've been running 3.23 for years, but several users are clamoring for new
versions, as many php apps are using newer features, so I downloaded the
source for 5.0.51b to run on a different TCP port.
I found a reference on a couple of ways to do this here:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/
Hello,
I remember some activity regarding some flakiness when using merge-tables.
I searched out and reviewed this:
http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=26881
Using 5.0.51a on RHEL 4 box, I'm still seeing similar issues.
The INFORMATION_SCHEMA shows the merge table as follows
TABLE_CATALOG: NUL
>-Original Message-
>From: Andrew Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 9:20 AM
>To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
>Subject: force row to appear at top of results using order by
>
>Hello,
>
>I have an order by question...
>
>This is the "raw" data...
>
>mysql> SELECT events
SELECT events_groups_id, events_groups_name FROM events_groups
ORDER BY IF(events_groups_id=1,0,1),events_groups_name ASC;
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 9:20 AM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: force row to appear at top of
Many thanks for the quick replies! This solution appears the most elegant:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Markus Grossrieder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2008/7/1
Subject: Re: force row to appear at top of results using order by
To: Andrew Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Andrew,
somethi
>-Original Message-
>From: Waynn Lue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 8:01 PM
>To: Jerry Schwartz
>Cc: MySQL List
>Subject: Re: Queues on MySQL?
>
>Thanks for the suggestion--is that essentially using
>http://www.php.net/posix_mkfifo within PHP?
>
[JS] Yes, that's what
Hello,
I have an order by question...
This is the "raw" data...
mysql> SELECT events_groups_id, events_groups_name FROM events_groups;
+--+-+
| events_groups_id | events_groups_name |
+--+-+
|1 | Personal Ev
On Jun 24, 2008, at 2:57 AM, Gwynne Raskind wrote:
I'm having the issue with CREATE TABLE described by Bug #30513 (http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=30513
). To summarize, a table which previously existed, and then is
dropped by DROP TABLE IF EXISTS, becomes randomly unable to be
recreated. He
13 matches
Mail list logo