Heikki,
When you write your documentation, please include more info on my.cnf
settings. What I would like to see are some settings documented for
different machines (i.e. machines with 64M, 128M, etc. of memory and also
disk space numbers and how they relate.)
Thanks,
Rick
-Original Messag
, Richard RE SSI-GRAX
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Innobase compile problems
Rick,
have you downloaded version 3.23.34 and not 3.23.34a?
I downloaded 3.23.34a, untarred it, and mem0dbg.c was in innobase/mem
directory.
I have attached to this email a copy of mem0dbg.c.
Are your Makefile's
Please see my comments below.
>Do you mean that when you compile, on the compiler line >there is not the
>flag -I../include?
No, not really. I mean in the dependencies for a target.
>If the flag is missing, there obviously is something >wrong with our
Makefile.am's or configure.in's. You >prob
I failed to mention that I used the RedHat Source RPM and I am using RedHat
6.2.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Mehalick, Richard RE SSI-GRAX
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 6:10 AM
To: 'Heikki Tuuri'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Innobase compile problems
Hi,
I
Hi,
I tried to build from source the latest MySQL 3.23.34a and I found the
following problems:
1) The Makefile in the 'pars' and 'mem' directory have missing ../include/
paths on some dependencies.
2) In the 'mem' directory, the file mem0mem.c tries to include mem0dbg.c,
but I think this should
I was wondering what others are thinking with respect to transaction table
type (BDB, Innobase, or Gemini) choices.
It seems to me that if you want transaction support in MySQL, then you must
pick one of the available transaction table types. And I would also assume
that row level locking would
You must compile from source to get BDB support into mysql. Make sure you
download the appropriate BDB source and place it in the mysql directory.
-
/ Rick Mehalick Senior Consultant
/ Shell Services International SSI-GPAX
/ Phone: 281-544-5
Yes, Ed is correct. You store data, but it is the trasport of that data
that makes XML look good. To me, using XML to transport the data is like
using recordsets in Microsoft/ADO.
-
/ Rick Mehalick Senior Consultant
/ Shell Services Interna
. Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 1:20 PM
To: Mehalick, Richard RE SSI-GRAX
Cc: 'Ed Carp'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: XML support under mySQL
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:49:40AM -0600, Mehalick, Richard RE SSI-GRAX
wrote:
>
>
Some relational databases return results in XML format.
-
/ Rick Mehalick Senior Consultant
/ Shell Services International SSI-GPAX
/ Phone: 281-544-5092(WCK)
/ Fax:281-544-2646(WCK)
/ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Will I be able to change my BDB tables into Innobase tables using Alter
table and how does INNOBASE tables differ from the GEMINI tables (when they
are available)?
-
/ Rick Mehalick Senior Consultant
/ Shell Services International SSI-GPAX
/ P
I thought that by using Berkeley tables, concurrent insert/select locks were
based on a page lock. I have seen the same locking with two clients as you
noted in your email. What I thought was happening is that since my tables
are small, I was getting the locking behaviour mentioned because rows
Berkeley tables (transactions) works for me. I am using RedHat 6.2. I
downloaded the sources and just unzipped/tar the Berkeley directly inside
the MySQL source directly. I then did .configure and I watched configure
tell me that it found the Berkeley directly and would use it.
I am still test
When using the BDB tables and RedHat 6.2 or 7.0, should --skip-locking be
used or not? I know it was recommended for earlier versions of RedHat, like
version 5.x.
Thanks in advance,
Rick
-
/ Rick Mehalick Senior Consultant
/ Shell Services I
It is my understanding that if AUTOCOMMIT=1 then as long as you don't start
a transaction with BEGIN, all SQL statements act as if BDB was not being
used. Of course you can't ROLLBACK a transaction either.
Rick
-
/ Rick Mehalick Senior Consultant
I asked a week ago if BDB tables had ever been tested by the MySQL team on
RedHat 7. Any ideas?
-
/ Rick Mehalick Senior Consultant
/ Shell Services International SSI-GPAX
/ Phone: 281-544-5092(WCK)
/ Fax:281-544-2646(WCK)
/ email: [
Will someone from the MySQL team (or anyone with this knowledge) please tell
me if the test suite has been run with RedHat 7.0 and Berkeley tables?
I am currently running RedHat 6.2 and Berkeley tables and transactions DO
work. I want to upgrade to RedHat 7.0, but not if transactions stop
workin
The MySQL team recommended upgrading to 3.23.29 gamma, especially if using
Berkeley DB.
-
/ Rick Mehalick Senior Consultant
/ Shell Services International SSI-GPAX
/ Phone: 281-544-5092(WCK)
/ Fax:281-544-2646(WCK)
/ email: [EMAIL PROTE
I have started testing MySQL 3.23.30g with latest MySQL provided Berkeley
source (3.2.3g)
I am using RedHat 6.2 and RPM source of MySQL. I compiled MySQL and altered
my existing tables to BDB.
So far my tests show that transactions are working. They are working for
new BDB tables and the altere
19 matches
Mail list logo
