Hi,
What does exactly happens when the AUTOINC lock is
happening ?
Why is it not a problem on our amd (quadcore) machine
with the data sitting on a raid10 partition, we have
never seen this problem before, its apparently
happening so fast that it doesn't matter.
With the intel machine (quadcor
43544160 setting auto-inc lock
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
LOCK WAIT 1 lock struct(s), heap size 368
MySQL thread id 634392, query id 3774951
NSERT INTO t2 VALUES ('')
--- TRX HAS BEEN WAITING 3 SEC FOR THIS LOCK TO BE
GRANTED:
TABLE LOCK table `t2` trx id 0 366
I have run into that bug with mysql 5.0.24a: bug #16979 auto-inc
My application was running OK on 4.1.7. But after migration to 5, the
problem started.
My questions are:
1-Can I run the patch on 5.0.24a even if it is for 5.0.21.
2-Which patch finally is the good one : the one from [13 May
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 18:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something like:
> Hello,
>
> Is there anything we can do to help the MySQL project, we are firm
> believers and would like to contribute in some way.
>
> We have a several 100 mps connections and server space.
MySQL already has a Southern C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Is there anything we can do to help the MySQL project, we are firm believers
and would like to contribute in some way.
We have a several 100 mps connections and server space.
Thank you,
Charles
DWHS Inc. Manager
http://www.dwhs.com
http://www.dwhs.com
Hello,
Is there anything we can do to help the MySQL project, we are firm believers
and would like to contribute in some way.
We have a several 100 mps connections and server space.
Thank you,
Charles
DWHS Inc. Manager
http://www.dwhs.com
http://www.dwhs.com/hostingforum/
https://dwhs.net
From MySQL 5.0.18 manual
==
When accessing the auto-increment counter, InnoDB uses a special table
level AUTO-INC lock that it keeps to the end of the current SQL
statement, not to the end of the transaction. The special lock release
strategy was introduced to improve
As my posting before, i still not found a primary key replacement for
auto_increment field.
Since whein inserting on auto_increment value, application will lock
table (LOCK AUTO-INC).
Sometime, i found that many process is waiting for this lock for what? I
don't know since ever thread
>
> I have 1016 records in a particular table. The first
> column is a Primary ID Int set to auto-inc. Now if I
> dump out all he records I can see 1 through 1016.
> None others , sorted it follows through numerically.
>
> However it seems that the records are showing
Primary ID Int set to auto-inc. Now if I
dump out all he records I can see 1 through 1016.
None others , sorted it follows through numerically.
However it seems that the records are showing up with
the Primary ID going up to 9000. If I do a simple
select * from table where primaryID = 858
ED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 7:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: two auto-inc fields possible ?
nope i don't think it's possible
BUT you can use the concat feature to get the result:
select concat('NEW-',running_id), concat('DEP-',running_id')
so lo
cool so i create a unique field say ticket_number , then when inserting
concat it to look like NEW-20040414-01 or NEW-01 u reckon ?
> -Original Message-
> From: Terence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 7:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: R
- Original Message -
From: "electroteque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 5:11 PM
Subject: two auto-inc fields possible ?
Hi there i was wondering if its possible to have two auto-inc fields ? I am
having to generate ticket numbers a
Hi there i was wondering if its possible to have two auto-inc fields ? I am
having to generate ticket numbers and i want it to look like DEP-1,
DEP-2, NEW-1, NEW-02 where NEW and DEP are the first 3 letters
of of the department associated with the ticket. How is this possible
(IOD)
-
- Original Message -
From: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 15:00:37 +0300
To: "\"iod iod\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: InnoDB AUTO-INC lock timeouts / deadlocks on inserts (using
> IOD,
>
> thank you for t
IOD,
thank you for the bug report. I was able to repeat the problem with you
scripts. The bug was that InnoDB failed to release at an SQL statement end
such AUTO-INC locks which were only granted after a lock wait. They were
only released at the transaction commit.
Since AUTO-INC locks normally
behavior, such that
table level AUTO-INC locks are being applied REPEATEDLY (duration of ENTIRE
transaction), even though the database has undergone multiple, commited transactions
previously. This behavior is very prominent when you have multiple processes with
overlapping, concurrent transactions
Iod,
- Original Message -
From: ""iod iod"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.mysql
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 8:14 AM
Subject: InnoDB AUTO-INC lock timeouts / deadlocks on inserts (using
>
> We have been using InnoDB with
ng:
INSERT INTO BasketItems(BalQuantity, ...
--- TRX HAS BEEN WAITING 46 SEC FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
TABLE LOCK table ca3/BasketItems trx id 0 26561327 lock_mode AUTO-INC waiting
At times there are around 4 to 5 such simultaneous waits in the log and ulti
ql in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux
/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i386-linux
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl .) at (eval 1)
line 3
Compilation failed in require at (eval 1) line 3.
Perhaps a module that DBD::mysql requires h
This is OT, perhaps post to comp.lang.perl.*?
Ric
p.s. try use DBI or use lib qw(/path/to/module)
- Original Message -
From: "Amy Zediak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MySql List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 3:01 PM
Subject: @INC
You need to install DBI first.
Amy Zediak wrote:
>
>I'm a little confused on how to add things to @Inc path...i'm trying to
>install Msql-Mysql-modules and it says that my DBI/DBD is not in the
&
I'm a little confused on how to add things to @Inc path...i'm trying to
install Msql-Mysql-modules and it says that my DBI/DBD is not in the
@INC
Thanks
Amy
-
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/
155184269 setting auto-inc lock, active,
lock wait, has 1 lock struct(s)
MySQL thread id 151538, query id 1612637 xxx.xxx.com nn.nn.nn.nn database update
insert into table_0 (attribute, attribute, attribute) values ( ..
--TRX IS WAITING FOR THE LOCK:
TABLE LOCK table database
In a message dated 22/02/2001 12:22:26 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<<
30 seconds work(less time than it took you to type your email) would've
revealed the answer:
1. Click on "the manual" link at the bottom of this message.
2. See the search box? Type in "auto increment"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have a table which contains a row called ListID which is set to auto
> increment, I added a load of test data into the table while I built my
> website so I could test various things out, anyway that is all finished now
> and I am read
At 12:24 AM -0500 2/22/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have a table which contains a row called ListID which is set to auto
>increment, I added a load of test data into the table while I built my
>website so I could test various things out, anyway that is all finished now
>and I am ready to
Hi,
I have a table which contains a row called ListID which is set to auto
increment, I added a load of test data into the table while I built my
website so I could test various things out, anyway that is all finished now
and I am ready to go live so I have dropped all the test data from the t
28 matches
Mail list logo
