Re: Performance Available

2006-05-24 Thread Jan Gomes
Thanks everybody for attention! I make some changes in hardare and in my table, and obtain a average response times of 0.09 second. Now i have a good time ! :-) Show you my changes: 1-Update MySql 4.1.18 -> 5.0.21. 2-Upgrade my memory to 3 Gb. 3-Severance of temporary/logs files and data file

Re: Performance Available

2006-05-23 Thread Jay Pipes
Jan Gomes wrote: The query is: SELECT * FROM table where id_table2 in (1652272,1652293,1652316,1652362); +-+---+---+--+ | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | +-+---+---+--+ | SIMPLE | table | r

Re: Performance Available

2006-05-23 Thread Jan Gomes
Hy Jay, > You don't show the query you are explaining. The query is: SELECT * FROM table where id_table2 in (1652272,1652293,1652316,1652362); +-+---+---+--+ | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | +-+---+---+---

Re: Performance Available

2006-05-23 Thread gerald_clark
Jan Gomes wrote: Hy Jay, Thanks for you attention. Show you my structure and EXPLAIN: CREATE TABLE `table` ( `id_table1` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', `id_table2` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', `field1`smallint(5) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', `field2`mediumint(8

Re: Performance Available

2006-05-23 Thread Jan Gomes
Hy Jay, Thanks for you attention. Show you my structure and EXPLAIN: CREATE TABLE `table` ( `id_table1` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', `id_table2` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', `field1`smallint(5) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', `field2`mediumint(8) unsigned NOT N

Re: Performance Available

2006-05-23 Thread Jay Pipes
Please post your exact table schema using SHOW CREATE TABLE, and your exact query, along with an EXPLAIN SELECT for the query. Thanks! -jay Jan Gomes wrote: Hy Guys, I have a simple structure of tables, howewer has 50 million of registers and 2,5 GB of data. The table is MyIsam and has 4 in

Re: Performance Available

2006-05-23 Thread Dan Buettner
Jan, right now I would say performance sounds pretty good for the amount of data you have. 50 million records / 2.5 GB of data is a pretty sizable dataset, so 4 seconds to retrieve a handful of records seems decent. Some suggestions for things you could do to possibly improve performance: 1 -