Re: Reply-to munging [OT]

2002-10-04 Thread Michael T. Babcock
Niclas Hedhman wrote: >I don't by the "less functionality" argument any more than "if you have a good >emailer". I think I have a good emailer, and on the "munging" lists, I press >Reply-All, it will also send to the original author, but >95% of the case I want the >list, and original author d

RE: Reply-to munging

2002-10-03 Thread Sqlcoders.com Programming Dept
> > I don't by the "less functionality" argument any more than "if > you have a good > emailer". I think I have a good emailer, and on the "munging" > lists, I press > Reply-All, it will also send to the original author, but >95% of > the case I > want the list, and original author doesn't want t

Re: Reply-to munging

2002-10-03 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Thursday 03 October 2002 22:33, Michael T. Babcock wrote: > Franz Alt wrote: > From one site: "Reply-To munging does not benefit the user with a > reasonable mailer. People want to munge Reply-To headers to make ``reply > back to the list'' easy. But it already is easy. Reasonable mail > pro

Re: Reply-to munging

2002-10-03 Thread Michael T. Babcock
Franz Alt wrote: >When I "reply", some lists set their list-adress automatically, some the >adress of the person originally posting. The second version may not so good >IMHO, because I think so many replies are not going to the lists. >mysql++ and mysql do not automatically reply to the list >m