On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 05:43:25PM -0500, Mark Engelhardt wrote:
> Hello everyone...
>
> I am looking for some thoughts and recommendations...
>
> We are going to upgrade our production mysql servers
> tomorrow... What version of mysql should we run with --It MUST be
> stable-- so we can have th
ot. I have also referred www.InnoDB.com for the same.
If anybody can tell me when it's stable version is going to be declared.
Thanks and regards,
Chetan Lavti
-
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.
Hi!
I'll be happy if I know that when "Stable version 4.0" will be released.
Thanks!
Homepage = http://www.nnr.or.kr/inos/
ICQ # = 123534385
Member of DSN(database.sarang.net), NNR(nnr.or.kr)
--MIME Multi
ng list regularly and didn't see any complaint or bug report
> >>regarding version 3.23.37. In fact I would like to know what is the most
> >>stable version running on that platform ?
> >
> >The best place to check for new versions is the MySQL web site o
>>regarding version 3.23.37. In fact I would like to know what is the most
>>stable version running on that platform ?
>
>The best place to check for new versions is the MySQL web site or you
>could subscribe to the announcements list
>
I think my question wasn't cl
Hi
At 21:17 12/04/2001 -0400, Jocelyn Bernier wrote:
>Hi everybody,
>
>I am currently running MySQL 3.23.35 on Windows NT 4.0 SP6. I checked the
>mailing list regularly and didn't see any complaint or bug report
>regarding version 3.23.37. In fact I would like to know what
Hi everybody,
I am currently running MySQL 3.23.35 on Windows NT 4.0 SP6. I checked the
mailing list regularly and didn't see any complaint or bug report regarding
version 3.23.37. In fact I would like to know what is the most stable
version running on that pla
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 11:19:59PM -0500, Jocelyn Bernier wrote:
> At 22:32 2001-03-23, G r e g L a w r i e wrote:
> >Hmmm, I am not sure whether there are issues with this particular version of
> >MySQL or not, but I would start looking at NT and the various bits and
> >pieces that it inst
At 22:32 2001-03-23, G r e g L a w r i e wrote:
>Hmmm, I am not sure whether there are issues with this particular version of
>MySQL or not, but I would start looking at NT and the various bits and
>pieces that it installs for memory leaks rather than MySQL.
>
>I have an NT server (same versions
D]
> Subject: Stable version ??
>
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am currently running MySQL 3.23.33 on a Windows NT 4 SP6. I need to
> restart it every day because the memory use rise during the day and never
> goes down. It looks like a memory link to me. Is version
Hi everybody,
I am currently running MySQL 3.23.33 on a Windows NT 4 SP6. I need to
restart it every day because the memory use rise during the day and never
goes down. It looks like a memory link to me. Is version 3.23.35 still have
this problem ???
__
Jocelyn Bernier
t; I am building a Java based application and want to use MySQL as my
> database. I would be using JDBC to access the MySQL database. My
> target
> platform is Solaris 2.7.
>
> I downloaded and installed MySQL version 3.22.32 which is the stable
> version available. Alas... this ver
Wow.. that's news :) so which features for eg. are buggy in 3.23
Sander Pilon wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hemendra Rana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 17 October 2000 00:17
> > To: MySQL
> > Subject: Availability of stable version for
Hi all,
I am building a Java based application and want to use MySQL as my
database. I would be using JDBC to access the MySQL database. My target
platform is Solaris 2.7.
I downloaded and installed MySQL version 3.22.32 which is the stable
version available. Alas... this versoin does not
14 matches
Mail list logo
