On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 10:20:58PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 2:29 AM -0400 2002/07/23, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
IMHO Even the really large DNSBL's are barely used -- I think
(much) less than 5% of total human mail recipients are behind
a mailserver that uses one...
Not
Thanks to those who suggested improper duplex negotiation between the 2621
and the 2900.
Although show int on the 2621 (running 12.0.7T) indicates full-duplex,
sh controller indicates BCR9 =0x (half-duplex).
Ralph Doncaster
principal, IStop.com
A couple people pointed out cisco-nsp would be more appropriate for
questions like the one I posted about packet loss.
http://puck.nether.net/lists/
Ralph Doncaster
principal, IStop.com
Actually RRDTool interpolates any late replys to the nearest specified
collection timepoint (e.g., every 5th minute.) It doesn't really resample.
Joe
Matt
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 10:55:43AM -0400, Joe Loiacono wrote:
Actually RRDTool interpolates any late replys to the nearest specified
collection timepoint (e.g., every 5th minute.) It doesn't really resample.
That particular document seems to refer to it as resampling, but yes,
interpolation
We're looking to get glass between three buildings, and looking closely at
the 15216 (passive WDM, ie, a prism).
A couple of rambling questions, that perhaps folks here have experience
with.
First, has anyone had experience with ITU Grid Optic GBICs? Do they even
exist?
Second, does anyone
[NANOG has been bouncing my attempts to reply to this thread
for several days, possibly because I quoted the word u n st a b l e
early on, apparently triggering the un subs cribe filter for words
that start with uns and contain a b.. If your posts to NANOG have
been silently bounced
Gents,
I thought I would pose the martians question here as well...
I'm trying to find out additional information on the reasoning behind
adding these martians to the Juniper's security appnote found on their
website:
Prefix Description
19.255.0.0/16 Ford Motor Company
Now, on to some of Juniper default martians:
128.0.0.0/16
191.255.0.0/16
192.0.0.0/24
223.255.255.0/24
These prefixes seem to be based on
www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iana-special-ipv4-03.txt. I'm
curious what the reasoning is behind selecting these prefixes only.
Also, given
Gents,
I thought I would pose the martians question here as well...
I'm trying to find out additional information on the reasoning behind
adding these martians to the Juniper's security appnote found on their
website:
PrefixDescription
19.255.0.0/16 Ford Motor
Thought this would be considered on-topic as guess who would have
to clean up the resulting messes...
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
- Forwarded message from Declan McCullagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Declan McCullagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FC: Draft of Rep. Berman's bill authorizes
So as not to cause confusion, the complete current JUNOS martian list
is:
0.0.0.0/8
127.0.0.0/8
128.0.0.0/16
191.255.0.0/16
192.0.0.0/24
223.255.255.0/24
240.0.0.0/4
My questions were on a select portion of these, and a portion of the
ones listed in the security appnote on their website.
Heya...
Anyone know if something is up on Qwest's run from Boston to NYC today?
Eric :)
Steve,
Hope this info helps answer your questions about QoS, implementations
and customers. Forwarded from a product person person in our org...
Sorry I didn't see this note earlier, but wanted to make you aware that
Would malicious actions on the part of copyright holders violate the
AUP of most networks? Or are service providers more willing to tolerate
denial of service attacks by large corporations than say, spam?
If this legislation is passed, they certainly will earn Null0 on mine.
Regards,
James
I second that. If I see any of my clients having any sort of malicious
activity directed at them, then there is no chance of me allowing their
traffic through. I would be more than happy to send all their traffic to
packet hell. Large corporations do not get any special consideration if
it
--On Tuesday, July 23, 2002 10:11 PM -0700 Andy Ellifson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
( CORRECTED ) MAJOR SUNSPOT ACTITVITY
I passed this on to a neighbor for comment wrt 802.11b. His response
appears below:
These blackouts generally affect communications in the HF (high frequency)
Agreed here. Has this even got a bill number yet?
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 13:15, Derek Samford wrote:
I second that. If I see any of my clients having any sort of malicious
activity directed at them, then there is no chance of me allowing their
traffic through. I would be more than
On 2002-07-24-14:10:00, James Thomason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this legislation is passed, they certainly will earn Null0 on
mine.
Unless, of course, the RIAA, MPAA, and friends carry out their
cracking through throw-away dial and DSL accounts, like they
purportedly use now to troll for
Just curious as to what people are using for metrics in their IGP
and what their reasons are; bandwidth? geographical distance? latency?
We have a survey paper on techniques for setting IGP weights
http://www.research.att.com/~jrex/papers/ieeecomm02.ps
On 7/24/02 11:31 AM, Adam Rothschild [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2002-07-24-14:10:00, James Thomason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this legislation is passed, they certainly will earn Null0 on
mine.
Unless, of course, the RIAA, MPAA, and friends carry out their
cracking through
If it starts happening, just unplug whoever's doing it and treat them like
a DDOSer...poof, you just lost your Internet connectivity.
Something Sony or MCA would love to have happen...huh?
Sorry, your'e causing malicious problems on the Internet, operational
procedure requires us to disable
The BSA is even flexing it's muscles here in the GWN.
http://www.istop.com/BSALetter.txt
Although they seem to have lots of money for scanning services and
lawyers, they expect ISPs to provide services (assisting them enforce
their copyrights) for free.
Ralph Doncaster
principal, IStop.com
Also check http://www.maj.com/sun/ for current solar info...nice site..
There are many places to get more information about sunspots. Being an
amateur radio operator who likes HF communications, I have a bit of an
interest in the topic.
The most succinct monitoring and information site I
Does anyone know of work done (from a network operations point of view
rather than from a solar science point of view) that correlates errors on
the copper part of networks, and/or machines in datacenters, with sunspot
activity?
scott
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Andy Ellifson wrote:
:
: For
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Shawn Solomon wrote:
One common solution is a hash based on the cpe site name or some other
unique key provided by the cpe information (address, ph #, etc).
Changing the hash occasionally provides new passwords, and it is all
easily scripted..
Most burglar alarms in the
26 matches
Mail list logo
