On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Bill Woodcock wrote:
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Glen Kent wrote:
says the solemn headline of Telegraph.
.. and we in Nanog are still discussing IPv6! ;-)
It's because we don't have a hadron demolition derby to power our American
interwebs:
The power of the grid
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for sharing your test results Kevin. Most interesting. I am
setting up a small test lab of a couple linux boxes myself to learn more
about the various traffic shaping and TCP stack options.
Ill post my results here. I am primarily
All -
Forwarded on Mirjam's behalf.
Aside: If you find the Thaler/Aboba article on protocol success
interesting you might also want to check out the plenary slides
from the last IETF:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/07dec/slides/plenaryt-1.pdf
- Lucy
-- Forwarded message --
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Randy Bush wrote:
It's the same process that is used to update a delegation in the root zone.
For ccTLDs I believe there's some kind of web portal to allow such changes
to be requested, but my experience is that the old text form also still
works just fine.
i
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Lynda wrote:
Mark Newton wrote:
On 05/12/2007, at 9:29 AM, John Savageau wrote:
If there is anything we at One Wilshire can do to assist any network ...
SCCN have carried out a temporary repair, and services are now restored
(ours are, in any case -- Two of our six
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Lucy,
What is your opinion on Randy Bush's latest post to the NANOG List?
He appears to be teasing me... I guess I can take it.
Best,
Martin
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, David Lesher wrote:
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
http://www.darkroastedblend.com/2007/03/really-bad-wiring-jobs_20.html
My contribution:
http://www.tux.org/wb8foz/66-666/
Note this was the closet at a group on the Hill that lobbies
On Thu, 31 May 2007, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
Does anyone know of any good IPv6 training resources (classroom, or
self-guided)? Looking to send several 1st and 2nd tier guys, for some
platform/vendor-agnostic training.
Internet2 people
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Cat Okita wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Lucy Lynch wrote:
I'd have a much easier time getting them to let me go to LA or SF, simply
because they aren't pervceived as prime vacation destinations, beaches
and all.
No beaches in Santo Domingo (beaches in LA and SF, however
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
In another message, William B. Norton wrote:
I wish we had a metric for the community value of the nanog list.
I think that if the mailing list was moved from merit to its own server, and
out from under the tyranny of majordomo to mailman, that
and hard to read...
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/allochrt.pdf
adhoc allocation taken to it's limits?
ack
___
Lucy E. Lynch | llynch @civil-tongue.net | llynch on jabber.org
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Lucy Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and hard to read...
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On Jan 20, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
Marshall wrote:
Those sorts of percentages are common in Pareto distributions (AKA
Zipf's law AKA the 80-20 rule).
With the Zipf's exponent typical of web usage and video watching, I
would
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Joe Abley wrote:
On 30-Nov-2006, at 17:15, Betty Burke wrote:
We should all remember though... the Top 10, including Chicago, will be a
bit more expensive, hotel contracts, and room rates to all of you.
I wonder whether we're looking at this the wrong way round.
Given
14 matches
Mail list logo
