t two hours to
filter/turn down 17557 and remove the problem. I bet most of their peers
say that's too slow, however :-)
I generally don't assume malice when mere incompetence will suffice, but
in the case of the Islamic world, they've proved themselves malicious
towards the non
g diversity up to par - and
> enable small ASes to grow.
The converse can also be true - we have a number of members who use the
IX fabric as a backup to their PIs with larger peering partners. If you
lose a PI carrying a GE of traffic, where does that traffic go?
--
Will Hargrave
>> I've got a link that is testing out at 29.5db loss @ 1550. Its 107km.
>> Shoot me a few suggestions?
> http://www.finisar.com/product-113-1_Gigabit_CWDM_GBIC_with_APD_Receiver_(FTR-1619-xx)
> 30dB. Will do more, we've done ~180km (~36dB) with one of those.
h
w being
> proposed as a solution to the problem of identity (eg, .bank to
> "solve" phishing). Unless there will be some level of enforcement
> teeth, we will see the same situtaion that played out in 94/95:
On a national level it's probably fairly easy to work this
he
South East of England, coupled with the same commercial growth requiring
more colo space in itself. This is a situation which several colo
operators seem well on the way to addressing. :-)
Will
Jo Rhett wrote:
> Oh, yes. Because BCPs are so very good at solving problems.
> I wanna go live in your happy universe. Because if BCP 38 were attended
> to more than 40% of my job would be irrelevant, and 12-15% of our
> traffic load would be reduced.
> ...one of the only colocation providers w
Gadi Evron wrote:
> "A 21-year-old college student in London had his internet service
> terminated and was threatened with legal action after publishing details
> of a critical vulnerability that can compromise the security of the ISP's
> subscribers."
>
> I happen to know the guy, and I am sadd
r l2/l3 VPNs?
The other technology which sees people deploying jumbos out there is
storage. Selling storage as well as transit over the IX? It could happen :-)
--
Will Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical Director
LONAP Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have to admit that I have no idea how BT charges
> ISPs for wholesale ADSL. If there is indeed some kind
> of metered charging then Internet video will be a big
> problem for the business model.
They vary, it depends on what pricing model has been sel
us, and so on are onsite and
will be able to deliver service reasonably quickly.
This is all assuming fibre, of course - you didn't say just how much
bandwidth you need. SDSL (don't forget multipair bonded) can be
delivered on a much shorter timescale (~2 weeks) and may be an
acceptabl
g the AC 'myth') can check
here http://www.seatguru.com/ - no idea how accurate it is.
Will
favourable. I'm not an expert but I think we
reject heat directly outside (300KW plant) but they also have systems
designed to exchanged directly into building chilled water.
Will
bit, and has been suppressed due to
dampening in your neck of the woods.
I did (and do) check on multiple ASs that I run and asked a few others to
check, also checked looking glasses and so on.
But anyway, it's back now, so nothing to see. Obviously a local problem of some
sort.
Will
=ematch&interval=1&prefix=192.54.112.0/24
Will
Mehgan Laveck wrote:
[Ebay woes]
There seem to be some thoughts as to akamai being the possible culprit,
specifically as it interacts with Linux. I'm hoping a few of you Linux
users out there will give it a shot, telnetting to port 80 on these IPs
several times to see if you can
"failure" in order to get it to
automatically switch at the right time without causing more problems
than you started with.
http://www.rfparts.com/coaxial.html
--
-Will :: AD6XL
Orton :: http://www.loopfree.net/
or the operational efficacy of membership
organisations like the LINX, and that is borne out by their willingness to join
and put traffic across the exchanges.
Will
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 12:41:21PM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> Given that at least part of JC Dill's comments were directly lifted from
> an e-mail I sent him, I feel compelled to put them side by side. JC's
> comments:
IIRC, s/him/her/
w
um allocation? Can my client approach RIR and
> > request for a /23?
> > If my client do procure a /23 how do they make make sure that this
> > address space will be globally routable?
They can't really make *sure* of it, any more than with any other
prefix I think there is
our network) and information like that which will help
> us with capacity planning. We are looking for suggestions if anyone has
> any real-world knowledge of anything that would tell us for example:
>
> 8% of our traffic is destined to AS 2828 (XO communications) etc.
I've found n
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 01:37:53PM -0700, Crist Clark wrote:
> As best I can tell from ARIN documents, ISP still are supposed to SWIP
> or use Rwhois for subassignments of /29 and greater. However, is this
> still widely practiced these days? Especially among smaller ISPs?
My understanding of th
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 01:50:08PM +0530, Abhishek Verma wrote:
> I have a doubt which i am sure a lot of people in this list would be
> able to help me with.
>
> There was news that terror groups like Al Qaida, etc. are using
> internet to promote their terror links and these web sites provide
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 08:01:20PM +0100, Alice Stamping wrote:
> - Is anyone maintaing a real-time list of known open web-proxies? I
> run a small network hosting several forum sites, and I want to build
> something I can query regularly (say, hourly or daily) that will let
&g
two mobile networks I have phones on (O2 and 0range) between about 1345 and
1530BST.
Saw no problems with landline PSTN, though.
Will
;m surprised this
hasn't happened to any of their other customers before now.
Am I missing something obvious here?
--
-Will :: AD6XL
Orton :: http://www.loopfree.net/
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 07:30:35PM +0300, aljuhani wrote:
> Recently we've noticed some increase in server Bandwidth usage
> and after using tcpdump, we were able to find the problem which
> is a DNS server on the Internet sending many queries per second
> to resolve MX , A records for that doma
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 01:35:06PM -1000, Richard wrote:
> We recently experienced several DOS attacks which drove our backbone
> routers CPU to 100%. The routers are not under attack, but the
> router just couldn't handle the traffic. There is a plan to upgrade
> these routers.
What kind of rou
Is it time to break out the "Please do not feed the trolls" sign?
Feeding 'em anyway... but *plonk* for Mr. Anderson. For those who are
masochists, read on.
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 10:50:29PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:
> But only 16 email clients (counting Netscape, Mozilla, and Firefox
> sepa
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 05:06:27PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 06:47:36PM -0500, Mike Hyde wrote:
[ Sorry for the self-followup. ]
> > I was wondering what everyone does to load balance over multiple
> > bgp feeds. We currently have 5 bgp feeds with 2 pr
27;ve generally been able to get surprisingly accurate results in terms
of how much traffic to send out one link or another just by using
route-maps and some simple netflow analysis, plus traceroute / ping.
I don't know if Netflow will give you much information in terms of
the best path, but it can
> boilerplate messages back.
I have dealt with some real people at Ebay, and I will say that they are
one of the few organizations that actually DOES try to do something
about phishing scams etc. My experience is that they do read, and take
action based on, spoof reports.
w
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 01:14:14AM -0700, David Conrad wrote:
>
> Fortunately, if it is a religion, I am agnostic in the BIND vs. DJB war
> since I work for a company that has created a product that could be
> argued competes with both... :-).
Didn't Nominum write BIND9, and doesn't / didn't i
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:52:20PM -0500, Adam Rothschild wrote:
> On 2005-03-22-03:30:32, David Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 3. Communities controlling Cogents AS path prepending
> > for customer routes on egress:
> >
> > community effect
> > 174:3000 do not annou
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 12:29:09PM -0600, Kathryn Kessey wrote:
>
> They are going to create publicly accessible, highly available
> database service of the all the world's porn sites and maintain it
> with up to the minute data... with 100K. Right.
Well maybe they're just trying to justify th
in (enterprise) production are
*unmaintained*. These will have a variety of vulnerable, buggy or just plain
crap IOS versions and no-one would've even considered upgrading for years.
If filters depend on IOS upgrades then those filters are there to stay.
ISPs will of course feed their rout
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 10:21:49AM -0800, Philip Lavine wrote:
> I have recently been turned down by ARIN for an address
> block. I currently have 4 /24's from ISP's and would like IP
> independence. How do I convince ARIN to give me a block -- /20 I
> guess? The form I filled out does not make i
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 02:15:49PM -0400, Deepak Jain wrote:
> > It goes a little further than that these days. Folks are openly
> > allowing customers to advertize routes with something lika a 666
> > community which will then be blackholed within their network. So if
&g
ave
both posted here in the past, and are good escalation points if you
can't get the problem resolved by emailing postmaster at aol or calling
their postmaster number. Often, it will take a while to get a call back
from someone if the postmaster team can't resolve your problem
immediately
p reduce bouncebacks due to spam and viruses with forged
sender addresses. It can help make phishing scams more difficult to pull
off. It makes it easier for someone to say "this domain will NEVER send
any legitimate email traffic".
Will spammers register tons of new domains, setting up SPF
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 10:20:44AM -0400, Wayne Chow wrote:
> We are in the process of planning for the upgrade of a 3Com network.
> The new infrastructure will be comprised of 3Com 4950s with XRN and a dozen
> stacks of 4400s.
> What are the best practices of testing the new implemen
he details of
> why. Process switched? Can anyone offer a resource or more specific
> information?
One which hasn't been mentioned - DHCP will break horribly if the dhcp
shared-subnets declarations don't match the multinetted subnets on the wire.
ility between
GBICs and especially miniGBICs. Our next procurement will include some
words about the kit's GBIC slots being vendor agnostic.
ernet is increasingly integrated so will be done more
centrally - I suppose in effect by the "service provider".
> I'm assuming this question would mostly apply to European, Asian, or Middle
> Eastern Internet access services...
I think it's fair to say that cultural d
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 08:24:29AM -0700, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
>
> Last time I researched remote reboot power strips it seemed like most of the
> power strips were garbage. Any recommendations for a solid performer would
> be appreciated. Thank you.
We've been pretty happy with the Bayt
rs are relunctant to develop. Scary thought.
I'd say having a login system which identifies the user is considerably
less difficult than maintaining a very extensive database of cable
patches which will inevitably get out of date (think replacement of dead
switches...) within a very short ti
you're sending their way.
By the way, w/r/t to the tiebreaker stuff, note that (on Cisco devices)
if you don't have "bgp bestpath compare-routerid" set, the route that
was received first will be preferred. This minimizes route-flap, but can
cause weird shifts in your traffic patt
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:36:10AM -0800, Christopher McCrory wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 11:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > So at least I wasn't the only one that felt this. Did Level3 ever say
> > what blew up on their network?
> >
>
> Not yet.
>
> There was a small tremor at 18:59 foll
t hop into their network (San Jose). I have
my BGP
session with them admin down for now as a result.
sh ip bgp dampening flap-statistics regexp _3356_
on route-views.oregon-ix.net at about 14:30 PDT gave me the phone book
--
-Will :: AD6XL
Orton :: http://www.loopfree.net/
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 03:13:30PM -0500, Sean Donelan wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:15:20 PST, Dave Crocker said:
> > > what about port 25 blocking that is now done by many access providers?
> > > this makes it impossible for mobile users, comin
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 08:42:29PM -0500, Dan Ellis wrote:
> I'm looking for comments on whether this is generally seen as a positive
> change or a waste of time (ie - will the next virus or worm gleam your
> SMTP username and password from Outlook Express and use it to
&g
; L3 forwarding function (for access/distribution) for all normal purposes.
ACLs are per-port and known to be buggy when operating on port numbers -
in particular UDP ACLs match will match arbritary data when presented
with a subsequent IP fragments (think NFS...)
As pointed out in a similar threa
ng simultaneously, not only VLAN *IDs* in the full 4K range.
I would check the Foundry Fastiron series - maybe the 4802. Everything
I've read appears to indicate they support all 4096 vlans
simultaneously, although you will of course want to verify this.
Extreme also appear to support
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 03:04:02PM -0500, Eric L. Howard wrote:
> At a certain time, now past [Jan.14.2004-01:36:08PM -0500], [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake
> thusly:
> > If anyone on the list is employed by Google please contact me ASAP.
> > I've sent emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and haven't gotten a r
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 05:07:04PM -0500, Colin Brown wrote:
> any word on 1200 west 7th Street?
I haven't noticed anything. Also spoke to someone over there and they
mentioned the lights flickering for a second - however they are
apparently not on generator power.
--
"Since when is skepticism
We (AS 12273) had no
wireline telco outages at all, and our colo provider (AS 14589
across town also in San Luis Obispo) went unscathed as well.
Power was unstable for a few minutes but only very small parts
of the city lost power for more than a few minutes, nothing the
UPSes couldn't handle.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 11:25:22PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> The only two folks that I was not able to reach were Yahoo! and SBCGlobal.
I've had good success reaching Yahoo based on the contact information in
the Arin whois; called the number on there, and got through to a real
person fa
oesn't mind my quoting this here):
This is, in fact, a block of suspected spam; the code will
be changed shortly to be more descriptive.
I have noticed this error with some apparently non-bulk and legitimate
mail recently.
AOL's postmaster team has gotten a lot more respon
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:03:44PM -0400, Andy Dills wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Scott Bradner wrote:
> > > Dan and Owen, I nominate you two for the tomato acquisition and
> > > distribution committee.
> > lets not
> >
> > tomatoes != knowledge (nor are an indicator of same)
> Nope, they're a
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:08:41PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
> I've been thinking that there should be a new type of
> record introduced to be application specific for HTTP, just as
> MX only applies to smtp.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is basically what SRV records
(rfc2782) are intended
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:24:08PM -0700, Steve Feldman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:41:14PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > The one that pisses me off more is
> >
> > http://news.com.com/2100-1038_3-5087139.html?tag=nefd_top
> From the bottom of those CNET articles:
> Contact us: htt
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:53:04PM -0700, JC Dill wrote:
> At 07:17 AM 10/4/2003, St. Clair, James wrote:
> > I would add that what you perceive as a "diverse group" is still a
> >realtively small sub-set of all the internet operations.
>
> Be that as it may, this group is *anything* but "close
e C company,
but I was trying like hell to replace Foundry with them before I left.
The only disclaimer being that they may have gotten better lately,
but I wouldn't bet a network on it.
The one good thing they have is a great price point. But as an engineer
you will pay for it in other ways.
I've gotten some really useful responses off list. Sorry for the extra
noise, but I'm going to summarize the responses to the list later today
(for the archives)...
I'm removing names, email addresses, company names and other identifying
stuff in case anyone doesn't want to be quoted publicly, bu
We're considering switching to Foundry BigIrons (probably the 4000, as
opposed to Cisco 6500 series switches. We're currently using 7206VXRs).
Anyone have opinions (on or off list) on this product? Looking through
the archives, I don't notice any discussions of this since about 2001 [1].
(http://
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:35:48AM -0400, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> Thought I'd mention that I helped setup BIND 9.2.3rc3 on a yellowdog
> linux powercomputing machine tonight. It worked. And the mail queues
> began clearing out. Just for an oddball success report.
We've been using th
egexp _30060$
> >Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path
> > *>i12.158.80.0/24 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 305100 0 1239 7018 26134
> > 30060 ? *>i64.94.110.0/24 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 305100 0 1239
> > 7018 26134 30060 ?
> > >
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 12:32:58PM -0400, John Payne wrote:
> --On Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:52 AM -0400 Kai Schlichting
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> From the [Hijacked] list:
>>> The ARIN information has been updated to have up-to-date contact info for
>>> the original owner, the ori
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 05:29:17PM -0400, Kai Schlichting wrote:
> On 9/3/2003 at 8:17 PM, "Jeroen Massar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As people are complaining all around about ISP's,
> > here is my small question. Who has a _working_ contact at
> > "CalPOP" (216.240.128.0/19 and others). It
On Thursday 28 August 2003 22:00, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
> I saw it on CNN but it sounds like it wasnt as bad as they wanted to make
> out.. frmo what I was told none of the major colos which are all in the
> East lost utility and I dont know about stuff in the South which is where
> the power w
> probably a low-life, bottom feeding scum sucking spammer who will
> burn in hell. NO addresses at this domain EVER want to hear from you.
>
> What part of that don't you understand?
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Message rejected by recipient.
I believe this particul
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 06:13:58PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
>
> We're seeing a LOT of these today probably in the thousands per
> second.
Eep - sorry for the annoying self-followup, but that should read
"thousands per minute" (and that during peak hours) -- it
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:28:27AM -0400, Omachonu Ogali wrote:
>
> For our Postfix viewers out there...
>
> header_checks:
> /^X-MailScanner: Found to be clean$/REJECT You're infected, but you probably
> won't see this message anyway.
Of course, this will al
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:32:04AM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> Has anyone else gotten one of these? It appears they are trolling
> a Nanog archive on the web and sending these out to posters. *sigh*
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from internetseer.com (mail9.internetseer.com
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:13:25AM -0400, Patrick Muldoon wrote:
> What is the proper way to deal with a company that is unresponsive to
> any form of contact. IE they have outdated information on their ip
> assignments, bounce every piece of e-mail that I send? (including
> postmaster@ which is
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:08:18AM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> Is there an abuse case management system as freeware somewhere,
> something like all the ticket/case handling packages out there, but
> more specifically aimed at abuse/complaint handling. I googled some
> but couldnt find any.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:56:01AM +, Peter Gray wrote:
> On the subject of host security issues and spam, try doing a search of the
> Usenet archive for '"Net Access Corporation" spam'. You get 328 results.
> And those are just the spams which people have traced to NAC, never mind
> the
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 03:27:55AM +, Mike Jones wrote:
> McBurnett, Jim writes:
> > Mike,
> > Have you sent this to ARIN?
> > Just Curious...
> I CC'ed ARIN and Saavis on that post as well.
The ARIN handles for both networks appear to be valid.
While I'm not going to rise to the flameba
t;
> Since then I have learned that some MTA's will look for an A record
> if it cannot find an MX record and use the A record instead.
An MX record is good practice, but is not required or necessary. If an
MX record exists, the MX record must be used; otherwise mail will be
del
[ Reply-To set to me ]
Sorry to be That Guy, but I've tried the usual methods of contact,
including the phone # for people who are blocked *by* AOL, without much
success. I've sent logs to the various addresses at
http://postmaster.info.aol.com/ and to the contacts for AS1668 with no
response.
B
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:25:15PM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> I'm feeling really dumb asking this, but how does one get host info
> out of Network Solutions WHOIS these days?
>
> I want to look up the contact info on a host. I can get the IP from
> the hostname and vice-versa along with the
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:41:21PM -0500, blitz wrote:
> Anyone having trouble getting to/ know of any issues with spamcop.net today?
>
> They seemed to have dropped off the radar from me...
>
> No pings
> No traceroute
>
> but they still show registered at 216.127.43.89
One of my customers
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 02:21:20PM -0500, Geo. wrote:
> Can someone verify something for me?
>
> Do an NSLOOKUP for www.stemtostern.com and stemtostern.com against the
> i.gtld-servers.net
>
> why would the www one resolve?
It's stale glue; i.e., there's a host (nameserver) record for this
ad
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 11:09:19AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> And on a related topic (whois.ripe.net almost unreachable, along with
> the rest of RIPE): rwhois.level3.net:4321 as been MIA or AWOL for
> about 4 days: Level3 was informed, but seems to have some good reasons
> of their own n
83 matches
Mail list logo
