FWIW I think TLDs should cost much more, like millions, other than
where they provide legitimate internationalization or specific
community service functions (TBD.)
1. They're just polluting the name space, many seem frivolous like
.RODEO or .FISHING (yeah those are real.)
2. Vanity corporate T
Occasionally one of our log analyzers will block gmail DNS requests
causing bounces when gmail claims our domain(s) are not authenticated,
they can't get to our SPF etc.
I'd like to whitelist them but does anyone know the list of IP blocks
I need?
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die
For completeness' sake at the first commercial ISP to sell individual
dial-up to the public, The World, we had six of those typical desktop
2400bps modems (I forget the brand tho I still have them, a photo also
I think) sitting on a file cabinet in an office space in Brookline, MA
plugged into a
Others have pointed to references, I found some others, it's all
pretty boring but perhaps one should embrace the general point that
some equipment may not like abrupt temperature changes.
But phones (well, modern mobile phones) don't generally have moving
parts.
So the issue is more likely wit
Something worth a thought is that as much as devices don't like being
too hot they also don't like to have their temperature change too
quickly. Parts can expand/shrink variably depending on their
composition.
A rule of thumb is a few degrees per hour change but YMMV, depends on
the equipment. S
On November 2, 2023 at 22:09 al...@allan.vin (Allan Liska) wrote:
> I think it is a matter of proportionality.
>
> According to Spamhaus malicious domains account for only 1.5% of all .com
> domains, but 4.8% of all .us domains
> (https://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/tlds/) - compare that
One could argue that much of this behavior was the result of most of
the internet preferring free, or nearly free, to paying for services
so all this jiggery-pokery evolved to try to make money to pay for
services and generate profits.
I suppose in theory one could argue they could have charged
On July 5, 2023 at 19:06 nanog@nanog.org (Owen DeLong via NANOG) wrote:
> Karin,
>
> Opinions regarding leasing vary throughout the industry. In my opinion, since
> the shift to provider assigned addresses during the CIDR efforts in the mid
> 1990s, the majority of addresses have been lease
On January 12, 2023 at 02:11 n...@neo.co.tz (Noah) wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> So, It was assumed that IPv4 depletion would effectively lead to the adoption
> of IPv6. This has not been the case in the last decade save for a very few
> countries in the world.
>
> It was also assumed that IPv6
I'm not opposed to making 240/4 unicast but I'd agree it wouldn't
solve much globally.
Nonetheless it might help for example some new org which can't get an
IPv4 allocation (or not sufficient.) They may really need to do both
IPv4 and IPv6 for example.
(ok, here we go, point by point alternativ
My suggestion is ignore anyone who says it would be too difficult to
get people to adopt a change or take too long. Someone always says
that, a reasonable riposte is "what would be a reasonable number of
people / years?" Surely they must have some numbers in mind, no?
We've been trying to get pe
I suppose this might be a useful point to butt in and say that one
reason we don't/can't easily term-limit US representatives to congress
is that it unjustly removes their right to run for office.
Obviously (I think) not apropos to IETF functioning tho perhaps in
spirit.
But it's why it took an
On October 16, 2022 at 14:18 ra...@psg.com (Randy Bush) wrote:
> my favorite is
>
> It's perfectly appropriate to be upset. I thought of it in a slightly
> different way--like a space that we were exploring and, in the early days,
> we figured out this consistent path through the space: IP
On October 3, 2022 at 16:05 m...@mtcc.com (Michael Thomas) wrote:
> The problem has always been solvable at the ingress provider. The
> problem was that there was zero to negative incentive to do that. You
> don't need an elaborate PKI to tell the ingress provider which prefixes
> customer
On September 19, 2022 at 10:16 b...@herrin.us (William Herrin) wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 10:04 AM wrote:
> > Are IP addresses like houses, though? Aren't they more like other
> > intellectual property such as trademarks or patents? What happens
> > to those when you don't pay the USPT
They should demand a full refund.
On August 23, 2022 at 18:33 b...@herrin.us (William Herrin) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> To folks at places like Google and Godaddy which have gotten, shall we
> say, overzealous about preventing spam from entering their systems,
> consider the risk:
>
> https:/
It's short and worth a read though most anyone here can skip down
about 3/4 to the paragraph beginning with "First, Washington should
consolidate..." unless you really need an explanation of why DDoS is a
problem (not a complaint, their target audience might benefit.)
It's CFR, the "Council on F
This has been going around for at least two years, makes for some
great scary, click-bait headlines ("they propose an internet kill
switch! For China!", and so forth.)
Besides the obvious question, "by what authority will they move this
forward?" many of us looked at the proposals and they're, i
Possibly interesting:
This kind of idea came up w/in ICANN when they were first considering
the idea of adding 1000+ new generic and internationalized TLDs. Will
it cause a melt down?
Money was allocated, studies and simulations were done, reports were
tendered.
The conclusion was: Not likely
Likelihood of passage aside I wonder where they believe they get
jurisdiction for this? Put another way would it stand up in court?
Put yet another way if they have jurisdiction for this wouldn't they
basically have jurisdiction for just about anything like no more
letter 'W's on the internet? G
You'd probably be 99.999% more successful in improving the state of
humanity by being more specific about what you are referring to.
Put another way you've probably reached "ICANN" by posting here, or as
well as you're likely to by any other means you're imagining.
On July 8, 2022 at 09:21 kmed
On June 22, 2022 at 10:35 jcur...@istaff.org (John Curran) wrote:
> Barry -
>
>
> There is indeed a metaphor to your “rattling doorknobs", but it’s not
> pretty when it comes to the Internet…
>
> If you call the police because someone is creeping around your property
>
When I lock the doors etc to my home I'll often mutter "ya know, if
someone is rattling my door knob I already have a big problem."
I suppose when I'm home it might give me a warning if I hear it.
There must be a metaphor in there somewhere.
I do recall as a teen noticing that one of the close
On June 20, 2022 at 18:01 jhellent...@dataix.net (J. Hellenthal) wrote:
>
> To what extent and to whom will you authorize to do that? 100 random college
> students? X number of new security firms? At some point it will break.
Define "authorize".
>
> --
> J. Hellenthal
>
> The fact
It seems to me there's vulnerability testing and there's vulnerability
testing and just lumping them all together motivates disparate
opinions.
For example it's one thing to perhaps see if home routers
login/passwords are admin/admin or similar, or if systems seem to be
vuln to easily exploitabl
Just to put a little more flesh on that bone (having spent about a
decade going to ICANN conferences):
Although organized under ICANN, address allocation would generally be
the role of IANA which would assign address blocks to RIRs for
distribution.
It's a useful distinction because IANA and th
Maybe someone mentioned this in the current go-around but it seems we
discussed this going back to when post-dialup became available, and
before, regarding campus always-on links.
There are different underlying business models possible with different
bandwidths.
The major split is whether you m
On April 29, 2022 at 09:55 n...@blastcomm.com (Nate Burke) wrote:
> As much as I hate legislation, more and more municipalities are levying a tax
> on streaming services. I wonder how the taxing bodies would feel if they
> knew
> that the company doesn't even know where their customers are.
Gratuitous anecdote:
When we moved into 1330 Beacon Street, Brookline, MA (the SS Pierce
Building, 19th c) the phone closet had knob & bolt copper termination
blocks.
At some point the telco, then New England Telephone, came to replace
them with 66 blocks.
As they worked I joked that they look
On March 22, 2022 at 11:53 jmai...@jmaimon.com (Joe Maimon) wrote:
> 25 years to not achieve global domination opens the door to become
> obsoleted before it does. Pretty sure that would be more bad than good.
Not uncommon, but the problem is: Obsoleted by what exactly?
We're kind of in a si
I'll mention, as I often do at this point in this conversation over
the past few decades, that nothing stops you from designing and
implementing such a network and, for demonstration / proof of concept
purposes at least, floating it on top of IP.
Build a better mouse trap...
On March 17, 2022 a
I remember in the 80s getting into a rather detailed debate with an
OSI fan about how OSI put at least authorization into what we'd call
the IP layer roughly, CLNP/CLNS/TP0-4.
A lot of it came down to you send me your initial handshake and I
first see if you're authorized and if not reject you r
I think I basically understand the policy and allocation processes.
What I was looking for was some characterization of the current trends
for IPv4 requests, particularly how urgent and worthy they might be
and the amount of space being sought.
RIRs will receive those requests. The rest of us d
But the RIRs are the ones fielding requests for IPv4 space, and have
some notion of how policy implementation might work in practice, so
should have a lot of useful input.
On March 14, 2022 at 00:45 niels=na...@bakker.net (Niels Bakker) wrote:
> * b...@theworld.com (b...@theworld.com) [Mon 14 M
Personally I'd rather hear from the RIRs regarding the value or not of
making more IPv4 space such as 240/4 available. They're on the front
lines of this.
I think sometimes what we're manipulating in these debates is the time
factor: Someone with a worthy, immediate, urgent need versus some
dist
I could offer a more philosophical assessment of IPv6 deployment.
Perhaps we're there, we're doing fine. This is how it is going to go.
It's out there, it works (glitches aside), those who want it use it
tho they can't force others to use it so still need to maintain a
dual-stack if that's of i
On March 10, 2022 at 15:25 m...@beckman.org (Mel Beckman) wrote:
> In my view, there is a core problematic statement in this document:
>
> “Military and propaganda agencies and their information infrastructure are
> potential targets of sanctions.”
>
> What is a “propaganda agency”. A po
I'm beginning to wonder if the internet will survive the ipv6 adoption
debates.
Here's the real problem which you all can promptly ignore:
The IETF et al are full of bright technical people who can design
protocols, packet formats, etc.
But many of the major problems facing the internet are no
Further!
Here's a page with about 25 dial-up ISPs in Ukraine:
https://isp.today/en/list-of-all-services/UKRAINE,toic-14,c-1
If I go to www.ua.net, as one try, they list dial-up services and
prices:
http://www.ua.net/price/ediup.htm
Looks current.
The point being that dial-up internet is
1. They don't have to wait or hope for a starlink terminal to arrive.
They just have to dig out an old serial modem or system with one built
in (they were common), find a phone line which will support that, and
figure out how to get a dial-up account and use it. Like most of the
world did ~20 ye
TBH I doubt Putin et al could care less about a handful of starlinks
in Ukraine.
They're each basically one uplink for one or maybe a few devices in a
country of 44M.
If they did care the easiest/cheapest thing to do would be for the
Russians to sweep neighborhoods for starlink transmission fre
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RealNames
On January 20, 2022 at 11:16 nanog@nanog.org (Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG)
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:29 AM james.cut...@consultant.com <
> james.cut...@consultant.com> wrote:
>
> As in any other company, the Marketing Department ha
On November 20, 2021 at 21:29 j...@west.net (Jay Hennigan) wrote:
> > That depends on your timeline. Do you know many non-technical people
> > still using their Pentium III computers with circa 2001 software
> > versions? Connected to the Internet?
# date; lscpu
Sun Nov 21 20:14:44 EST 2021
Reading over many of these notes my observation is that many here are
good at understanding the technical points of the proposals and
throwing around 224/4 this and 127/8 that.
Then the discussion mostly disintegrates into anecdotes with hands
waving furiously, "my anecdote is VERY important!"
That suggests an idea:
Repurpose these addresses and allow the RIRs to sell them in the IPv4
secondary markets with some earmark for the funds. Plus or minus
perhaps some worthy causes for "free" (not quite free but old school)
allocations.
If you can't agree on any worthwhile earmark you can a
On November 18, 2021 at 11:15 c...@tzi.org (Carsten Bormann) wrote:
> On 2021-11-18, at 00:29, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> >
> > This seems like a really bad idea
>
> Right up there with the FUSSP.
They do have one thing in common which is people will immediately
shoot down proposals becaus
Perhaps silly but am I the only one with an ARIN POC RegDate of
1970-01-01? I've been in that db a long time but not quite that long.
Does it matter? I have no idea what the correct date might be so
the instructions to correct don't help.
If I needed that info I'd consult the ARIN DB but I gues
FWIW the term I'd use is "swatting" rather than "joe job".
Perhaps picky but it may be the right interpretation, someone is
trying to get someone else arrested and in some dramatic fashion, not
just harassed.
On October 21, 2021 at 16:43 hanni...@gmail.com (Martin Hannigan) wrote:
>
> Hi Bec
On October 21, 2021 at 16:13 bka...@ford.com (Kain, Becki (.)) wrote:
> I'm just kidding. I wasn't on until 1990 when I was teaching IBM 370
> assembler
I taught IBM 370 ASM for several years at BU, I can probably still
explain what a CSECT is, never know when it might come up like right
now
On October 21, 2021 at 16:04 bka...@ford.com (Kain, Becki (.)) wrote:
> How old are all you people?
My first experience with the ARPAnet was either 1977 or 1978 when
someone got me an ITS account at MIT (BARRYS@AI), I was working at
Harvard.
Tho I didn't really have much use for the net other
Just to throw in another curve ball what got many of us excited about
the internet or Internet was that at the time there were several
networking protocols in wide usage like SNA (IBM), DECNET (DEC), XNS
(Xerox, ok not such wide usage), BITNET (mostly IBM systems,
organization was volunteer, publ
On October 20, 2021 at 13:09 m...@mtcc.com (Michael Thomas) wrote:
> Yeah, I miss DECUS too. I remember one plenary when somebody asked when the
> VAX
> would support the full 4G address space to laughs and guffaws from panel.
We had an 8MB Vax 11/780 at Harvard Chemistry ca 1982 (VMS) which
On October 20, 2021 at 16:08 m...@beckman.org (Mel Beckman) wrote:
> Mark,
>
> Before 1983, the ARPANET wasn’t an internet, let alone The Internet. Each
> ARPANET connection required a host-specific interface (the “IMP”) and simplex
> Network Control Protocol (NCP). NCP used users' email ad
One might think in over six hours they could point facebook.com's DNS
somewhere else and put up a page with some info about the outage
there, that this would be a practiced firedrill.
Yeah yeah cache blah blah but it'd get around and at least would be
coming from them. I'd imagine some mutual pa
17:35EDT: I'm suddenly getting:
Sorry, something went wrong.
We're working on it and we'll get it fixed as soon as we can.
Go Back
Facebook © 2020 · Help Center
and:
% host facebook.com
facebook.com has address 157.
Although I believe it's generally true that if a company appears
prominently in the news it's liable to be attacked I assume because
the miscreants sit around thinking "hmm, who shall we attack today oh
look at that shiny headline!" I'd hate to ascribe any altruistic
motivation w/o some evidence
On September 15, 2021 at 15:40 sa...@cluecentral.net (Sabri Berisha) wrote:
> - On Sep 15, 2021, at 2:20 PM, b...@theworld.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > The 600 ton elephant in the room is anyone could right now sit down
> > and design and deploy some alternative to IPv4/IPv6 and from the
On September 15, 2021 at 13:31 war...@kumari.net (Warren Kumari) wrote:
> Well, there is the EPO button, which generally does that, and the (variously
> labeled) HALON/FM-200/GAS FIRE SUPPRESSION/GAS DISCHARGE button, which does
> the
> flashy lights and klangly bell and similar. This is fai
The 600 ton elephant in the room is anyone could right now sit down
and design and deploy some alternative to IPv4/IPv6 and from there
begin writing down how they did it as a series of standards documents
and encourage others to give it a try hoping for some snowball effect.
You just float it on
Every time I've read a thread about using TVs for monitors several
people who'd tried would say don't do it. I think the gist was that
the image processors in the TVs would fuzz text or something like
that. That it was usable but they were unhappy with their attempts, it
was tiring on the eyes.
In this old (really not all that old comparatively, mid-late 19th c)
Boston neighborhood there are apparently still appliances w/o
thermocouple gas shut-offs.
I know because a local gas guy I was talking to told me it was a
nightmare if they had to shut off the gas in the street. They had a
list
I guess I sort of started this part of the thread because I was
thinking: Gosh, I sure hope people who own home generators read NANOG
regularly (or linepersons have some other plan).
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die| b...@theworld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purvey
I have a gas-fired hot water system, the electricity is also used to
run the gas blower. I believe most of the electricity it uses is for
circulating the hot water which you mention but it won't do anything
w/o electricity.
Actually I can bypass the circulator and it will do its best to
circulat
Ok, I'll be the curmudgeon...
Is this really a problem in practice?
Most people I've known who worked around electrical mains etc assumed
the worst at all times and it isn't all that difficult to protect
against as one works.
I realize one can infinitely invoke "better safe than sorry!", "an
o
No, the root of the problem is the telcos making billions on these
robocalls. Make that illegal, start fining them billions (whatever it
takes), and it will stop.
We've already had this discussion on nanog, recently, and people who
were in that business stood up to affirm that yes indeed-y they'
Something which binds them together are their insurance underwriters
who generally want to set minimum requirements without having to
review home-brewed security schemes. They want buzzwords and acronyms
to put onto checklists.
Others would be courts (e.g., when lawsuits arise) and government an
Can I make an old f*** comment on all this?
We didn't design this network to be highly secure.
It's general enough that security can be layered on at various places.
But when you get down to it it was mostly designed to get information
flowing easy, fast, and freely. Not to lock it down or pro
The video is pretty good particularly where it's most pessimistic.
My prediction:
It might take a little more than ten years but I'll predict positive
ID or you're not getting anywhere useful.
And a lot of people here will loathe that.
But you/we had your chance and spent most of your ene
And some of the lessons of group creation on USENET was:
1. You don't create a sub-topic to try to generate discussion. So for
example you don't create talk.baseball.redsox because no one ever
posts about the redsox in talk.baseball. It doesn't work. Not really
relevant here tho it might become
From: George Herbert
...Interesting overview of fire damage.
I remember many years ago spec'ing a machine room at BU and coming to
loggerheads with the VP of building and grounds.
He (well, their rules) wanted low-temp sprinkler triggers, I wanted
the high-temp ones (I forget but I think 135F
Anyone remember when DEC delivered a new VMS version (V5 I think)
whose backups didn't work, couldn't be restored?
BU did, the hard way, when the engineering dept's faculty and student
disk failed.
DEC actually paid thousands of dollars for typist services to come and
re-enter whatever was on p
At Boston Univ we discovered the hard way that a security guard's
walkie-talkie could cause a $5,000 (or $10K for the big machine room)
Halon dump.
Took a couple of times before we figured out the connection tho once
someone made it to the hold button before it actually dumped.
Speaking of halo
One day I got called into the office supplies area because there was a
smell of something burning. Uh-oh.
To make a long story short there was a stainless steel bowl which was
focusing the sun from a window such that it was igniting a cardboard
box.
Talk about SMH and random bad luck which coul
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2021, John Kristoff wrote:
>
> > Friends,
> >
> > I'd like to start a thread about the most famous and widespread Internet
> > operational issues, outages or implementation incompatibilities you
> > have seen.
> >
When Boston University joined the internet proper ca 198
In my humble but correct opinion one of the things which sabotages
these efforts is an aversion to any solution which doesn't feel like
it would work quickly and decisively (ask Bezos to offer a discount to
anyone using IPv6 to order on Amazon???)
I remember back in ~2003 on the Anti-Spam Resear
I notice I often get DDoS'd when I post here, to NANOG, usually w/in
2-3 hours, so owing to this note it'll probably happen again tonight!
The typical attack is some mixture of DNS whacking from dozens or
hundreds of hosts, plus usually UDP packets being flung at basically
round-robin ports (udp
Let me say a few words about David Tilbrook.
Unlike the author of that very nice linked article below I knew David
quite well. I co-chaired a couple of Usenix conferences with him and
even flew to Toronto for his daughter's bat mitzvah (umm, because he
invited me), etc.
He was very smart, he'd
On January 21, 2021 at 12:39 nanog@nanog.org (Jean St-Laurent via NANOG) wrote:
>
> I feel this is a good example that a pen is mightier than a sword.
In all honesty have we really given the sword a chance in these cases?
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die| b...@theworld.com
On January 20, 2021 at 16:06 nanog@nanog.org (Grant Taylor via NANOG) wrote:
> On 1/20/21 3:50 PM, b...@theworld.com wrote:
> > Around 300MB/day.
>
> Interesting.
>
> I see 50-70 MB / day for text only newsgroups.
>
> Perhaps I want to step up to more than text only on some of my serve
On January 20, 2021 at 13:41 b...@herrin.us (William Herrin) wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 12:40 PM wrote:
> > 2. Usenet is dead and besides a full feed is 20+TB/day because it's
> > dead, but 20TB/day...
>
> Hi Barry,
>
> How much is it per day if you skip the groups distributing
>
Through a coincidence of hardware failures "out there", which should
come back soon, and admittedly some inattentiveness as peers went
away, The World finds itself looking for some Usenet peers.
Not a full feed, we can talk.
1. OT? Feel free to point me to a better place which anyone is likely
On January 14, 2021 at 04:56 j...@baylink.com (Jay R. Ashworth) wrote:
> Well, it probably gets way worse: if it's a "permanent" battery, it will be
> harder to find, and harder to replace...
No, you don't replace the permanent batteries in these 10 year smoke
detectors, you toss the whole smo
(Topic at hand was just building an emergency alert system into smoke
detectors rather than try to come up with some complex
internet-oriented design.)
On January 14, 2021 at 03:56 j...@baylink.com (Jay R. Ashworth) wrote:
> Last time I looked, consumer residential smoke detectors were still ru
Sorry for intruding one more time but in my experience, which is
absolutely vast, amateurs argue written law, professionals (i.e.,
lawyers) generally argue precedent; how courts have interpreted the
law in cases applicable to the issue at hand.
If no useful precedent exists professionals tend to
Sometimes it's worth turning the issue around and looking at it right
up the...um, whatever.
A friend who is rather right-wing (tho mostly sane) said angrily that
AWS terminating Parler was "Stalinist" (apparently his metaphor for
totalitarian.)
I said no, the government _forcing_ AWS to carry
On January 10, 2021 at 08:42 sro...@ronan-online.com (sro...@ronan-online.com)
wrote:
> While Amazon is absolutely within their rights to suspend anyone they want
> for violation of their TOS, it does create an interesting problem. Amazon is
> now in the content moderation business, which c
On January 4, 2021 at 21:19 valdis.kletni...@vt.edu (Valdis Klētnieks) wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2021 15:33:10 -0500, b...@theworld.com said:
> > Why wouldn't we just build this into 10-year battery smoke alarms, a
> > simple radio receiver?
>
> First, that means your smoke alarm batteries ru
Why wouldn't we just build this into 10-year battery smoke alarms, a
simple radio receiver?
Why does anyone think this must be a feature of the internet when, as
people here have described, that entails all sorts of complexities.
You just want something that goes BEEP-BEEP-BEEP KISS YOUR ASS
GO
Let's just go back to air-raid sirens.
I'm old enough to remember when they were tested every day at noon,
which also told you it was noon (lunch!)
We'd say heaven help us if The Enemy attacked at noon.
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die| b...@theworld.com | http://w
Another way to phrase the question (which was the subject of much
dispute 30 years ago) is:
Which would you rather have (I'll use modern speeds):
1gb flat rate
10gb metered
Where metered 10gb could cost less than 1gb when you don't use it, or
about the same at ~1gb, but more if you use >1gb?
I'm not so sure. If someone got the banks, credit card (fintech), big
online shopping, etc (tho not a lot of etc needed) on board, the "head
count" for that wouldn't be very large, and others would join
(particularly retail) just to not be left out...
One can build a quite different network on t
Somedays I wonder if it's some vast, well-funded, Spectre-like
organization whose backers just want to see trust in the internet
undermined in the public's eyes on behalf of their own non-internet or
anti-internet (think: phone companies who'd love to charge you per
email and web page access for
Slow Friday...
One pressing problem of "AI", and might be a useful analogy, is that
we're (everyone w/ the money) deploying it, for some value of "it",
into weapons systems.
The problem is that decisions made by for example an attack drone
might have to be made in milliseconds incorporating man
"Don't anthropomorphize computers, it just pisses them off." -- some wag
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die| b...@theworld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information U
Instagram is enabling an harassment attack.
They are sending out "change in terms of use" statements, you've
probably received it.
Apparently they will send them to unconfirmed accounts, en masse.
So for example you own example.com and all email for *@example.com
goes to you.
And there are no
Addrex.net
I know some of the principles personally and would vouch for them.
On June 11, 2020 at 14:27 edwin.malle...@gmail.com (edwin.malle...@gmail.com)
wrote:
> Hi Nanog,
>
>
>
> I have need of a reputable IPv4 broker or service ? personal experience with
> said broker would be
Looks cool, I'll check it out, thanks!
https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/WanderLust
On May 14, 2020 at 14:57 ra...@psg.com (Randy Bush) wrote:
> > I tend to read email with EMACS/VM.
>
> fwiw, i moved from VM to Wanderlust a dozen years ago; if i remember
> aright, for better imap support.
I tend to read email with EMACS/VM. It has a 'k' command which kills
(marks deleted) every message with the same subject as the current
message being viewed.
On May 14, 2020 at 20:36 bj...@mork.no (Bjørn Mork) wrote:
> At the risk of starting an off topic discussion here, but am I the only
> o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAeqVGP-GPM
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die| b...@theworld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
On April 29, 2020 at 07:35 na...@ics-il.net (Mike Hammett) wrote:
> "What is it, exactly, that you expect a provider to do with your report of a
> few failed SSH login attempts to stop the activity?... disconnect the
> customer."
>
> Yes.
What I've done in the past is tell the customer we
1 - 100 of 294 matches
Mail list logo