Re: Temporary DIA in Equinix MI1

We can help you. I will contact offlist On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 09:42 Eric C. Miller wrote: > Hello, > > > > We have a circuit in MI1 that we are trying to relocate, but there’s a > crazy delay. Does anyone have the ability and desire to coordinate a > Equinix cross co

Temporary DIA in Equinix MI1

Hello, We have a circuit in MI1 that we are trying to relocate, but there's a crazy delay. Does anyone have the ability and desire to coordinate a Equinix cross connect and sell us DIA for 3-4months? Usage is 2-3Gbps Residential, we can use our own IPs/ASN if necessary. Eric

Re: Equinix MLPE max-prefix 0?

Now the value is back to normal. I guess just mistake by someone :) On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 9:57 AM Phillip Crescent wrote: > It seem overnight equinix set the mlpe router server max prefix value to 0 > for their 24115 ASN. This is the ASN used for all router server sessions >

Equinix MLPE max-prefix 0?

It seem overnight equinix set the mlpe router server max prefix value to 0 for their 24115 ASN. This is the ASN used for all router server sessions https://www.peeringdb.com/net/3658 I’m not clear on why an IX would do this… anyone?

Equinix: Still looking for routeserver community info

my prefix and doesn't forward... Does anybody have experience with getting the MLPE system to do what would be required (i.e., take the prefix, attach a NO_EXPORT, and forward)? Thanks! Elmar. PS: Anybody from Equinix wanting to shed some light on this, please...

Re: Equinix routeservers (MLPE) behavior c/f no_export

know... I just don't know what Equinix actually does. As said before, I assumed transparency (==passthru). Any hard experience info would be helpful here :-) Thanks again, Elmar.

Re: Equinix routeservers (MLPE) behavior c/f no_export

mention that this should behave the same as their "set the no_export" TE community. We are using Equinix' IXP platform's routeserver service (MLPE) in a few locations on the planet, and due to the nature of our anycast structure, we are sending our prefixes with the well-known NO_EXPORT

Equinix routeservers (MLPE) behavior c/f no_export

Hi guys (and others), I couldn't find an official description/explanation of this (EQX docs only mention that this should behave the same as their "set the no_export" TE community. We are using Equinix' IXP platform's routeserver service (MLPE) in a few locations on the plane

Re: Equinix IX support contact me please

al asset"...Equinix...) > If you really want to email > servicedesk...@eu.equinix.com should be right assuming you're using the > fabric in Germany like your email address suggests. Otherwise, check This was about PAIX, but yeah, there might be some email contacts. I guess my main p

Re: Equinix IX support contact me please

://www.equinix.com/contact-us/customer-support for the appropriate country contact. Chris On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 5:16 AM Elmar K. Bins wrote: > Hi folks at Equinix, > > your peeringdb entry contact address (servicesupp...@equinix.com) bounces. > Please contact me right away to fix a MAC filter. > > Elmar. > >

Equinix IX support contact me please

Hi folks at Equinix, your peeringdb entry contact address (servicesupp...@equinix.com) bounces. Please contact me right away to fix a MAC filter. Elmar.

SF DigitalRealty <> Equinix PAIX Dark Fiber

Hello NANOG, I’m looking for dark fiber providers between: Digital Realty at 200 Paul Ave, San Francisco & Equinix SV8/PAIX at 529 Bryant St, Palo Alto I am looking for 2 strands (simplex count). I’m already in talks with Zayo and Wave (known as Astound now) but am checking to

Re: Equinix Sales Rep

RIP Ryan's inbox On Fri, Jul 30, 2021, 5:25 PM Ryan Finnesey via NANOG wrote: > I know this might flood my inbox on a Friday, but I am looking for > recommendations on sales rep at Equinix that understand the carrier > space. I need to find out more information about their Equin

Equinix Sales Rep

I know this might flood my inbox on a Friday, but I am looking for recommendations on sales rep at Equinix that understand the carrier space. I need to find out more information about their Equinix Fabric product and it has been about 10 years since I have worked with Equinix

Moo fiber cleaner needed near London equinix ld5

Any suggestions for local purchase of a mpo fiber cleaner near equinix London ld5? Much appreciated 

Re: dfw equinix back door

> would love to get to our racks through a back door through equnix > exchange in the informart. our router is at > > ipv4 address 206.223.118.94 255.255.254.0 > ipv6 address 2001:504:0:5::4128:1/64 > asn 4128 solved randy

dfw equinix back door

would love to get to our racks through a back door through equnix exchange in the informart. our router is at ipv4 address 206.223.118.94 255.255.254.0 ipv6 address 2001:504:0:5::4128:1/64 asn 4128 thanks! randy

Could an Equinix Senior Management person please reach out to me ASAP

Sorry to invoke the NANOG pager this way, but: This pertains to F-Root operations at my day job with isc.org, in both the US and Europe markets. Feel free to use dmahoney at isc.org instead of this, my personal email. Best (and stay safe), -Dan Mahoney -- Dan Mahoney

Equinix Chicago Traffic Drop 5/29/2020

Last night between 5:20 am and 6:50 am UTC we noticed a large drop in traffic. Looking at flow data, Google had dropped traffic in same time period. We were wondering if anyone had noticed similar drop in traffic. Thank you, Kevin McCormick

EQUINIX contact

Is there an EQUINIX NOC contact on this list please reply offlist. Having serious logistical issues in an ashburn datacenter. Tickets are not being approved for access and shipments have been delayed weeks. This is vital infrastructure and im probably not the only one having issues

Equinix IX Dallas Legacy Route Servers Decommissioning - Subnet Expansion

PSA: For anyone on the Equinix IX in Dallas who may have missed the announcements - The subnet in Dallas was expanded to a /23 and there are new MLPE route servers. The old route servers will be decommissioned this week. >From Equinix: "IBX(s): DA1,DA10,DA2,DA3,DA4,DA6,DA7,

Re: Equinix LA4

Hey Mike, It should be cheaper than anything else + XC. https://www.equinix.com/interconnection-services/equinix-connect/ On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 19:12, Mike Hammett wrote: > > How is that priced out compared to a cross connect? > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelli

Re: Equinix LA4

Or GTT Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> From: NANOG on behalf of Mehmet Akcin Sent: Friday, February 7, 2020 12:14:10 PM To: Mike Hammett Cc: nanog Subject: Re: Equinix LA4 Yeah he.net<http://he.net> is probably best option On Fri,

Re: Equinix LA4

IX > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > -- > *From: *"Saku Ytti" > *To: *"Mehmet Akcin" > *Cc: *"nanog" > *Sent: *Friday, February 7, 2020 1:43:48 AM > *Subject: *Re: Equinix LA4 > > > Hey there, > > > I am looking for 100mbps b

Re: Equinix LA4

iday, February 7, 2020 1:43:48 AM Subject: Re: Equinix LA4 Hey there, > I am looking for 100mbps burstable to 1G (copper preferred) transit in > Equinix LA4 to be used as out of band connectivity. Can do fiber if must. Would Equinix Connect work? https://www.equinix.com/interconnec

RE: Equinix LA4

There really isn’t a cost effective was to do out of band management in Equinix or Digital Realty since the XC will cost about as much as the circuit. In any event Cogent or HE is your best bet for a cheap Out of Band Circuit. Rob Robert DeVita  Managing Director, Mejeticks   214-305

Re: Equinix LA4

Hey there, > I am looking for 100mbps burstable to 1G (copper preferred) transit in > Equinix LA4 to be used as out of band connectivity. Can do fiber if must. Would Equinix Connect work? https://www.equinix.com/interconnection-services/equinix-connect/ Lot of people in the past have pre

Equinix LA4

Hey there I am looking for 100mbps burstable to 1G (copper preferred) transit in Equinix LA4 to be used as out of band connectivity. Can do fiber if must. Please let me know if you can provide this offlist -- Mehmet +1-424-298-1903

WTR: 1-2RU @ Equinix Ashburn

Hi, I’m wondering if anyone is looking to subsidize their Equinix Ashburn colo costs by way of carving out 1-2 RU to a friendly for a low density networking application. If so, I’d love to hear from you! Thanks in advance!

Re: Equinix Dallas IXP ? Down ?

Imtiaz ; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Equinix Dallas IXP ? Down ? No issues here. Erich Kaiser The Fusion Network On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 8:48 AM Tom Beecher wrote: I see no issues on 2 separate Equinix Dallas connections. On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 9:16 AM Faisal Imtiaz mailto:fai

Re: Equinix Dallas IXP ? Down ?

No issues here. Erich Kaiser The Fusion Network On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 8:48 AM Tom Beecher wrote: > I see no issues on 2 separate Equinix Dallas connections. > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 9:16 AM Faisal Imtiaz > wrote: > >> Hello, >> Quick question, is there know

Re: Equinix Dallas IXP ? Down ?

I see no issues on 2 separate Equinix Dallas connections. On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 9:16 AM Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > Hello, > Quick question, is there known issue with Equinix Dallas IXP ? > (Or it is just our connection ? Seeing all peers down). > > Thanks. > Regards.

Equinix Dallas IXP ? Down ?

Hello, Quick question, is there known issue with Equinix Dallas IXP ? (Or it is just our connection ? Seeing all peers down). Thanks. Regards. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom http://www.snappytelecom.net Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email:

Re: Equinix

On Thu, Dec 5, 2019, at 17:10, Martijn Schmidt via NANOG wrote: > Hi Drew, > > You're probably best off ordering those crossconnects through the > Equinix portal, then you can choose the exact positions for the order > that goes to the facility rather than relying on a huma

Re: Equinix

I'll second Martijn's comment and add this: Never choose "Next Available." It's the easy route up front but painful the rest of its life. We started predetermining where we wanted each of our xconnects (regardless which colo company) and submitting the port numbers with tickets / Equi

Re: Equinix

On 05/12/2019 17:10, Martijn Schmidt via NANOG wrote: You're probably best off ordering those crossconnects through the Equinix portal, then you can choose the exact positions for the order that goes to the facility rather than relying on a human to transcribe them correctly from your PDF

Re: Equinix

Hi Drew, You're probably best off ordering those crossconnects through the Equinix portal, then you can choose the exact positions for the order that goes to the facility rather than relying on a human to transcribe them correctly from your PDF. Best regards, Martijn On 12/5/19 4:28 PM, Drew

RE: Equinix

Ah, it's the DC campus. We've been installing some cross connects with CenturyLink and we send Equinix the LOAs with the exact ports and they just connect them to random patch panel ports and nothing works. (because of course not) so then we have to contact them again and it just continues

Re: Equinix

We have seen this amongst other DCs as well, good help is hard to find :) On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 7:38 AM Drew Weaver wrote: > Hey all, > > > > I am wondering if anyone else has had a really hard time working with > Equinix over the past 6 months. It just seems like every

Re: Equinix

Is it a specific IBX? We've noticed no issues at CH1 At 08:37 AM 05/12/2019, Drew Weaver wrote: Hey all, I am wondering if anyone else has had a really hard time working with Equinix over the past 6 months. It just seems like everything we try to do gets done incorrectly without

Equinix

Hey all, I am wondering if anyone else has had a really hard time working with Equinix over the past 6 months. It just seems like everything we try to do gets done incorrectly without explanation or oversight. Prior to the last 6 months or so they had been fairly flawless doing basic tasks

Equinix Hong Kong

Hello, Anybody from Equinix willing to help me out with an issue in Hong Kong? Please contact me off-list. Thanks. -Hank Disuko

IXP Renumbering: Equinix Miami (formerly known as NOTA)

It seems that many participants of the Equinix Miami Exchange (formerly Nap of the Americas NOTA) are unaware of the required IP renumbering. Init7 AS13030 sees at least 50% of the new BGP sessions still down. While the usefulness of the replacement of the peering mesh /23 with another /23 could

Re: Chicago Equinix IX LAN oddity

On Tue, Oct 8, 2019, at 20:47, JASON BOTHE via NANOG wrote: > I realize this might not be the right list but I have a request to peer > on the Chicago Equinix IX to a 206.223.119 IP but we and many others That block is for Equinix-IX Dallas (at least according to Pee

Re: Chicago Equinix IX LAN oddity

Equinix renumber the IP Block from a /24 to a /23 and everyone was suppose to be off the old block I think around a year ago. I am sure some providers did not migrate everything off that IP Block. Everyone that was a member at that time was given a new IP Address on the /23 subnet, I believe

Re: Chicago Equinix IX LAN oddity

lize this might not be the right list but I have a request to peer on >> the Chicago Equinix IX to a 206.223.119 IP but we and many others are on the >> 208.115.137 network. While I await a response from the peering partner, I’d >> curious to know if this is an error, perhaps there w

Chicago Equinix IX LAN oddity

Hi all I realize this might not be the right list but I have a request to peer on the Chicago Equinix IX to a 206.223.119 IP but we and many others are on the 208.115.137 network. While I await a response from the peering partner, I’d curious to know if this is an error, perhaps

Re: Advertisement of Equinix Chicago IX Subnet

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 09:36:20PM +, Graham Johnston wrote: > This afternoon at around 12:17 central time today we began learning > the subnet for the Equinix IX in Chicago via a transit provider; we > are on the IX as well. The subnet in question is 208.115.136.0/23. > Using sta

Re: Advertisement of Equinix Chicago IX Subnet

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 02:59:43PM +0100, Niels Bakker wrote: > * christopher.morrell.na...@gmail.com (Christopher Morrell) [Thu 28 Mar 2019, > 14:35 CET]: > > I've been bit by this in the past at two different exchanges. I too > > have a policy applied to deny IXP LANs from upstreams and peers.

Re: Advertisement of Equinix Chicago IX Subnet

* christopher.morrell.na...@gmail.com (Christopher Morrell) [Thu 28 Mar 2019, 14:35 CET]: I've been bit by this in the past at two different exchanges. I too have a policy applied to deny IXP LANs from upstreams and peers. It would be nice if there was a list of all IXP LANs somewhere that

Re: Advertisement of Equinix Chicago IX Subnet

gt;> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:37 PM -0500, "Graham Johnston" < >> johnst...@westmancom.com> wrote: >> >> This afternoon at around 12:17 central time today we began learning the >>> subnet for the Equinix IX in Chicago via a tr

Re: Advertisement of Equinix Chicago IX Subnet

, "Graham Johnston" < > johnst...@westmancom.com> wrote: > > This afternoon at around 12:17 central time today we began learning the >> subnet for the Equinix IX in Chicago via a transit provider; we are on the >> IX as well. The subnet in question is 208.115.136.0/23. Usi

Re: Advertisement of Equinix Chicago IX Subnet

at 4:37 PM -0500, "Graham Johnston" mailto:johnst...@westmancom.com>> wrote: This afternoon at around 12:17 central time today we began learning the subnet for the Equinix IX in Chicago via a transit provider; we are on the IX as well. The subnet in question is 208.115

RE: Advertisement of Equinix Chicago IX Subnet

@nanog.org Subject: Re: Advertisement of Equinix Chicago IX Subnet CAUTION: This email is from an external source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Graham Johnston wrote on 27/03/2019 21:36: > What am I doing that isn't b

Re: Advertisement of Equinix Chicago IX Subnet

Graham Johnston wrote on 27/03/2019 21:36: What am I doing that isn’t best practices that would have prevented this? you're setting the next-hop of the prefixes learned at the IXP to be your own IP address from the IXP subnet (i.e. 208.115.136.0/23). When your routers learn this address

Advertisement of Equinix Chicago IX Subnet

This afternoon at around 12:17 central time today we began learning the subnet for the Equinix IX in Chicago via a transit provider; we are on the IX as well. The subnet in question is 208.115.136.0/23. Using stat.ripe.net I can see that this subnet is also being learned by others, see the snip

Equinix SV8 Peering fabric flooded since 1:45PM PST

Since around 1:45PM PST today we've been receiving a constant 10Gbps of flooding from the SV8 peering fabric. Traffic is not in the VLAN 6 peering VLAN so I haven't peeked at it. Anyone else seeing this at that exchange? Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com Desk:

Re: Equinix Fire Alarm - IBX was Evacuated

Appears to have just been a drill. They let us all back in within 15 mins. -Matt On Thu, May 17, 2018, 14:26 Luke Guillory <lguill...@reservetele.com> wrote: > Just got this. > > > > > Dear Equinix Customer, > > IBX(s): DA6 > IBX Address: 1950 North Stemmons

Equinix Fire Alarm - IBX was Evacuated

Just got this. Dear Equinix Customer, IBX(s): DA6 IBX Address: 1950 North Stemmons Freeway Suites 2049 & 3050 Dallas, TX 75207 Ticket#: 5-152980676699 Date and Time of Occurrence: 17-MAY-2018 14:04 Site Local Time INCIDENT SUMMARY: Fire Alarm - IBX was Evacuated INCIDENT DESCRIP

Slight recurring Packet Loss at Equinix Ashburn

Hi everyone, Apologies for the noise and feel-free to reply off-list. We have a transit link to Equinix Ashburn where we see regular 12-20% packet loss on "some" of the peers there. We are working with the transit partner and Equinix NOC for the past few days. I can provide graph a

Equinix SV8 Facebook IPv6 router 2001:504:D::47/64 constantly bouncing sessions

Are other SV8 peering exchange participants seeing problems with Facebooks 2001:504:D::47/64 router in the SV8? Been seeing this for over 48 hours now. No issues with other SV8 peers, or Facebooks other IPv6 router in the facility. Dec  5 18:52:00: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Down

Contact / RPF issue with GoDaddy at Equinix Chicago

Would anyone happen to have a name or number of an engineer at GoDaddy who could help me with an issue we’re seeing with them at equinix in Chicago? It looks like it might be related to some kind of RPF checking they’re doing on their side that’s causing traffic for some of our /16’s to get

Re: Equinix IX Port Moves

l.com > > Midwest-IX > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > - Original Message - > > From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> > To: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net> > Cc: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org> > Sent: Friday, Jun

Re: Equinix IX Port Moves

Same issue here. Super complicated. I'm tempted to stop the process after the first step. I think most things involving equinix are complicated and frustrating, at least once the contract is signed.

Re: Equinix IX Port Moves

orrow" <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> To: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net> Cc: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 9:46:17 AM Subject: Re: Equinix IX Port Moves On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Mike Hammett < na...@ics-il.net >

Re: Equinix IX Port Moves

-a On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Fredy Kuenzler <kuenz...@init7.net> wrote: > On 10.06.2016 16:00, Mike Hammett wrote: >> Who has moved an Equinix IX port? We're told that it's a full >> cancellation, re-order, re IPs, re-peering, etc. >> >> Can anyone lend any in

Re: Equinix IX Port Moves

On 10.06.2016 16:00, Mike Hammett wrote: > Who has moved an Equinix IX port? We're told that it's a full > cancellation, re-order, re IPs, re-peering, etc. > > Can anyone lend any input either way on that? Same issue here. Super complicated. I'm tempted to stop the process after th

Re: Equinix IX Port Moves

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net> wrote: > Who has moved an Equinix IX port? We're told that it's a full > cancellation, re-order, re IPs, re-peering, etc. > > Can anyone lend any input either way on that? > > ​there are 2 meanings (at l

Equinix IX Port Moves

Who has moved an Equinix IX port? We're told that it's a full cancellation, re-order, re IPs, re-peering, etc. Can anyone lend any input either way on that? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com

Equinix Chicago Cross COnnects

of the connection mattering. My Equinix rep tells me that there is no difference from one to the other. I take that to mean that I could put my own wave system on the glass and be fine. I just have a very hard time believing them, based on what I remember and the fact that they've giving me a 25 - 30 mile

Re: Equinix 350 E. Cermak

If you wanted 1/4 cab out of 1102 Grand in KC we might be able to accommodate you as well. On Jan 24, 2016 8:06 PM, "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net> wrote: > Do any of you have excess space within Equinix at 350 E. Cermak? It needs > to be both of those due to the nu

Re: Equinix 350 E. Cermak

@nanog.org> Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2016 8:18:59 PM Subject: Re: Equinix 350 E. Cermak If you wanted 1/4 cab out of 1102 Grand in KC we might be able to accommodate you as well. On Jan 24, 2016 8:06 PM, "Mike Hammett" < na...@ics-il.net > wrote: Do any of you have ex

Equinix 350 E. Cermak

Do any of you have excess space within Equinix at 350 E. Cermak? It needs to be both of those due to the number of cross connects to other players within Equinix 350 E. Cermak. Equinix direct is pricing full cabs at a ridiculous price. Given that we need 1/4 cab or less, it's hard to justify

RE: Anyone having issues with Equinix IX out of Ashburn?

; don't print this email. -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Baker, Byrn Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 8:32 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Anyone having issues with Equinix IX out of Ashburn? All of our IX peers dropped around 11 UTC. All

RE: Anyone having issues with Equinix IX out of Ashburn?

with Equinix IX out of Ashburn? Hi, Seems it was some icmpv6 neighbor solicitation multicast storm. Got about > 800kpps this morning for about 4hours... Strange there is no rate limits somewhere... Regards

Re: Anyone having issues with Equinix IX out of Ashburn?

We've seen issues as well. We've just started to turn the exchange up again and check if it's fixed. On 27/11/15 15:03, Nick Ellermann wrote: At about 4:15 am eastern we lost our bgp peers on the Ashburn IX at Equinix. Equinix is not responding to our support requests, either

Anyone having issues with Equinix IX out of Ashburn?

At about 4:15 am eastern we lost our bgp peers on the Ashburn IX at Equinix. Equinix is not responding to our support requests, either they are overloaded with support requests or all on holiday. Curious if others know if there are known issues at this site or is it just us. Sincerely, Nick

RE: Anyone having issues with Equinix IX out of Ashburn?

on of what was found. -evt > -Original Message- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jeroen Wunnink > Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 9:13 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Anyone having issues with Equinix IX out of Ashburn? > > We've seen iss

Re: Anyone having issues with Equinix IX out of Ashburn?

Hi, Seems it was some icmpv6 neighbor solicitation multicast storm. Got about > 800kpps this morning for about 4hours... Strange there is no rate limits somewhere... Regards

RE: Anyone having issues with Equinix IX out of Ashburn?

All of our IX peers dropped around 11 UTC. All recovered about 30 mins later. -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jeroen Wunnink Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 8:13 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Anyone having issues with Equinix IX out

Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix

On 03 Aug 2015, at 15:50, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com wrote: How does DE-CIX work if you want to cross connect over the exchange to another provider in a different on-net datacenter of the exchange in the same metro market? I’m not sure, but you may be looking for the GlobePEER

Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix

Gucker cguc...@onesc.net wrote: On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com wrote: What are the main difference between these two peering companies, exchanges, and overall operating model? The market in question would be Dallas Texas where Equinix already has

Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix

@nanog.org Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 8:50:26 AM Subject: Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix Does DE-CIX usually go to market with at least some of the big content providers already on board? For example, will guys like Netflix, Google, and other CDN's more than likely be on the exchange starting day 1

Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix

I'd expect that eventually DE-CIX will build into every Dallas datacenter as they have done in New York and Germany whereas Equinix is only available... in Equinix. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest

Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix

provider in a different on-net datacenter of the exchange in the same metro market? On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net wrote: I'd expect that eventually DE-CIX will build into every Dallas datacenter as they have done in New York and Germany whereas Equinix is only

Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix

I would expect DE-CIX to repeat what they've done elsewhere and expand the IX into any reasonable building in the metro area, greatly increasing its available member count and bringing the IX to places where Equinix isn't. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics

Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix

: North American Network Operators' Group nanog@nanog.org Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 10:49:29 AM Subject: Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix As DE-CIX learned, NYC is a very difficult market to get connectivity and to build an exchange in. As such their operating costs are a lot higher than in other

Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix

As DE-CIX learned, NYC is a very difficult market to get connectivity and to build an exchange in. As such their operating costs are a lot higher than in other markets circuits in the states are more painful than northern europe, japan, etc. a bunch of smaller isps in the states were annoyed

DE-CIX vs Equinix

What are the main difference between these two peering companies, exchanges, and overall operating model? The market in question would be Dallas Texas where Equinix already has the only established peering exchange with over 100 members, and DE-CIX just announced today that that would also

Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix

On 22/Jul/15 15:48, Colton Conor wrote: Why would people pay more to connect to an exchange with less members? What is the european exchange that is a non-profit and basically only covers the cost of operating the exchange? My knee-jerk response would be that the big EU exchange points are

Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com wrote: What are the main difference between these two peering companies, exchanges, and overall operating model? The market in question would be Dallas Texas where Equinix already has the only established peering exchange

Also seeking transit in Equinix SV2/Santa Clara (was: Re: RFP for Internet Transit for ARIN ASN 394018)

Folks - I forgot to mention the second west coast Internet transit RFP for delivery at Equinix SV2 - https://www.arin.net/announcements/2015/20150605.html Thanks! /John On Jun 9, 2015, at 9:23 AM, John Curran jcur...@arin.netmailto:jcur...@arin.net wrote: Hello NANOG Folks - Apologies

Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions

November 2014 13:18, Ruairi Carroll ruairi.carr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear List, I've got an upcoming deployment in Equinix (DC10) and I'm struggling to find a provider who can give me a 100Mbit port (With a commit of about 5-10Mbit) with a /23 or /24 of public space , for OOB purposes. We had

Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions

I hear the chaps at Hurricane Electric can help you with a nice tunnel for that... yea.. because when the sh*t hits the fan I REALLY need a dependency upon a wonky tunnel server made of cheese and mouse parts to be in the middle of my work process? wait a sec! there's cheese? where?

Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions

of my work process? wait a sec! there's cheese? where? I understand that it is ashburn equinix. randy, who may have to rethink tunnels :)

Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions

made of cheese and mouse parts to be in the middle of my work process? wait a sec! there's cheese? where? I understand that it is ashburn equinix. randy, who may have to rethink tunnels :) cheese++

Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions

On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:36:17 -0500, Christopher Morrow said: also, it's hard to use ipv6 when your last miile provider doesn't offer it... I hear the chaps at Hurricane Electric can help you with a nice tunnel for that... pgpXkkUAc8thG.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions

On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:36:17 -0500, Christopher Morrow said: also, it's hard to use ipv6 when your last miile provider doesn't offer it... I hear the chaps at Hurricane Electric can help you with a nice tunnel for that... Indeed. I've

Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions

just last week i was able to get a /23 from $ISP as part of my transit purchase with them for one location, but you still have to explain and justify your use to $ISP (who in-turn has to explain/justify to ARIN). if you can't do that, it really is just cuz i want it. like someone else said

Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions

I hear the chaps at Hurricane Electric can help you with a nice tunnel for that... there is no such thing as a nice tunnel

  1   2   3   >