Re: authority to route?

2012-11-16 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:05:39 -0800, Kyle Creyts said: Jeez, isn't RPKI supposed to solve this problem? That would presume the existence of a deployed system that everybody actually used. pgpSBbgRGoEqE.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: authority to route?

2012-11-16 Thread Richard Barnes
I think Heather was pointing out that this would be a good time to actually use it. On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:55 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:05:39 -0800, Kyle Creyts said: Jeez, isn't RPKI supposed to solve this problem? That would presume the existence of a

RE: authority to route?

2012-11-15 Thread Schiller, Heather A
..for some blocks I've taken over admin for. Make sure you are visibly listed as a Point of Contact on those records in the appropriate RIR, so that folks who get your request can verify you. Even better, register in your RIR's RPKI program and generate a ROA for it. Info about ARIN's

Re: authority to route?

2012-11-15 Thread Kyle Creyts
Jeez, isn't RPKI supposed to solve this problem? On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Schiller, Heather A heather.schil...@verizon.com wrote: ..for some blocks I've taken over admin for. Make sure you are visibly listed as a Point of Contact on those records in the appropriate RIR, so that

Re: authority to route?

2012-11-14 Thread Joe Abley
On 2012-11-12, at 14:43, Jim Mercer j...@reptiles.org wrote: Is there a common practice of providers to vet / validate requests to advertise blocks? Yes, most providers whose customers request a particular route to be pointed towards them will ask for ambiguous instructions, written on

Re: authority to route?

2012-11-14 Thread joel jaeggli
On 11/14/12 2:40 PM, Joe Abley wrote: On 2012-11-12, at 14:43, Jim Mercer j...@reptiles.org wrote: Is there a common practice of providers to vet / validate requests to advertise blocks? Yes, most providers whose customers request a particular route to be pointed towards them will ask for

Re: authority to route?

2012-11-14 Thread Mark Gauvin
Careful though cause the crayons must be crayola approved Sent from my iPhone On 2012-11-14, at 5:28 PM, joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote: On 11/14/12 2:40 PM, Joe Abley wrote: On 2012-11-12, at 14:43, Jim Mercer j...@reptiles.org wrote: Is there a common practice of providers to vet /

Re: authority to route?

2012-11-14 Thread Robert Glover
Another big-name-big-$$$ vendor whose name begins with C. Sounds like a conspiracy to me On 11/14/2012 5:09 PM, Mark Gauvin wrote: Careful though cause the crayons must be crayola approved Sent from my iPhone On 2012-11-14, at 5:28 PM, joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote: On

Re: authority to route?

2012-11-12 Thread Jimmy Hess
On 11/12/12, Jim Mercer j...@reptiles.org wrote: Hi, Is there a common practice of providers to vet / validate requests to advertise blocks? There is a common practice of providers to require an initial Letter of authorization from the org listed in WHOIS when first setting up, and manual