On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:05:39 -0800, Kyle Creyts said:
Jeez, isn't RPKI supposed to solve this problem?
That would presume the existence of a deployed system that
everybody actually used.
pgpSBbgRGoEqE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I think Heather was pointing out that this would be a good time to actually
use it.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:55 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:05:39 -0800, Kyle Creyts said:
Jeez, isn't RPKI supposed to solve this problem?
That would presume the existence of a
, 2012 2:44 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: authority to route?
Hi,
Is there a common practice of providers to vet / validate requests to advertise
blocks?
Who is the authority when it comes to determining if a request for routing is
valid?
Is it the WHOIS data maintained by the various RIR
your records in order first.
--Heather
-Original Message-
From: Jim Mercer [mailto:j...@reptiles.org]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 2:44 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: authority to route?
Hi,
Is there a common practice of providers to vet / validate requests to
advertise
On 2012-11-12, at 14:43, Jim Mercer j...@reptiles.org wrote:
Is there a common practice of providers to vet / validate requests to
advertise
blocks?
Yes, most providers whose customers request a particular route to be pointed
towards them will ask for ambiguous instructions, written on
On 11/14/12 2:40 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
On 2012-11-12, at 14:43, Jim Mercer j...@reptiles.org wrote:
Is there a common practice of providers to vet / validate requests to advertise
blocks?
Yes, most providers whose customers request a particular route to be pointed
towards them will ask for
Careful though cause the crayons must be crayola approved
Sent from my iPhone
On 2012-11-14, at 5:28 PM, joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
On 11/14/12 2:40 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
On 2012-11-12, at 14:43, Jim Mercer j...@reptiles.org wrote:
Is there a common practice of providers to vet /
Another big-name-big-$$$ vendor whose name begins with C. Sounds like
a conspiracy to me
On 11/14/2012 5:09 PM, Mark Gauvin wrote:
Careful though cause the crayons must be crayola approved
Sent from my iPhone
On 2012-11-14, at 5:28 PM, joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
On
Hi,
Is there a common practice of providers to vet / validate requests to advertise
blocks?
Who is the authority when it comes to determining if a request for routing
is valid?
Is it the WHOIS data maintained by the various RIR?
It seems I'm playing whack-a-mole to get some routes shut down
On 11/12/12, Jim Mercer j...@reptiles.org wrote:
Hi, Is there a common practice of providers to vet / validate requests to
advertise blocks?
There is a common practice of providers to require an initial Letter
of authorization from the org listed in WHOIS when first setting up,
and manual
10 matches
Mail list logo