Lucy,
What is your opinion on Randy Bush's latest post to the NANOG List?
Best,
Martin
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Lucy,
What is your opinion on Randy Bush's latest post to the NANOG List?
He appears to be teasing me... I guess I can take it.
Best,
Martin
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 04:51 -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> Lucy,
>
> What is your opinion on Randy Bush's latest post to the NANOG List?
Are you possibly referring to the one about Abha Ahuja?
-Jim P.
> Lucy,
>
> What is your opinion on Randy Bush's latest post to the NANOG List?
I wonder, was Randy's message so cryptic that you didn't realize he was
memorializing a fallen comrade?
I wonder why Randy is driven to make everyone of his postings a combined
IQ and trivia test, but since they are
Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 04:51 -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Lucy,
What is your opinion on Randy Bush's latest post to the NANOG List?
Are you possibly referring to the one about Abha Ahuja?
In the interests of those who may not have noticed Randy's amusement
All:
Please encourage everyone to take advantage of the process ..
Voting activity picked up a lot this morning, but if the level of
participation doesn't increase rapidly, we may have a lower
turnout than last year. I think last year we had about 160 ballots cast.
Betty
Did the election notice go out to everyone that is
in the current voter list? (I seem to recall it's anyone
that attended in the past 2 years).
Perhaps a note to nanog-announce or similar would be
worthwhile.
- Jared
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:50:07AM -0400, Betty Burke
Hi Jared:
A reminder regarding elections and the survey was also sent to
nanog-announce:>
Betty
--On Tuesday, October 16, 2007 12:03 PM -0400 Jared Mauch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did the election notice go out to everyone that is
in the current voter list? (I seem to recall it
On 16-Oct-2007, at 0950, Betty J. Burke wrote:
Please encourage everyone to take advantage of the process ..
Voting activity picked up a lot this morning, but if the level of
participation doesn't increase rapidly, we may have a lower
turnout than last year. I think last year we had about 1
At 60 votes, that's .6% participation. If we don't hit at least 2, we
ought to seriously consider disbanding the current "evolution".
-M<
On 10/16/07, Betty J. Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All:
>
> Please encourage everyone to take advantage of the process ..
>
> Voting activity picked up
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:03:36PM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> At 60 votes, that's .6% participation. If we don't hit at least 2, we
> ought to seriously consider disbanding the current "evolution".
If that means the disbanding of NANOG is that acceptable?
I think the numbers
Since I've heard from a couple of people who are having problems,
allow me to channel Betty:
Follow:
To create username and password: https://www.nanog.org/registration/
username.epl
or
To have username and password resent: https://www.nanog.org/
registration/password.epl
If anybody has a
On 16 Oct 2007, at 11:38, Joe Abley wrote:
Since I've heard from a couple of people who are having problems,
allow me to channel Betty:
Follow:
To create username and password: https://www.nanog.org/
registration/username.epl
or
To have username and password resent: https://www.nanog.org/
Hello,
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, at 10:50, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 16-Oct-2007, at 0950, Betty J. Burke wrote:
>
>> Please encourage everyone to take advantage of the process ..
>>
>> Voting activity picked up a lot this morning, but if the level of
>> participation doesn't increase rapidly, w
Question, I wonder if we can get statistics on how many people who have
registered at this nanog have voted vs those who are not physically here?
This would help determine if putting a "voting desktop" outside of main
conference room help increase voting participation?
Also, possibly, instead of
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Alex Pilosov wrote:
Also, possibly, instead of posting to -announce, a direct email to
last-registered-email should be sent to each eligible voter reminding them
to vote - Some people who attend aren't on any mailing list. (actually, it
is an interesting data point, but proba
16 matches
Mail list logo
