On 10/16/07, Jared Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:03:36PM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> > At 60 votes, that's .6% participation. If we don't hit at least 2, we
> > ought to seriously consider disbanding the current "evolution".
>
> If that means the disbandi
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Alex Pilosov wrote:
Also, possibly, instead of posting to -announce, a direct email to
last-registered-email should be sent to each eligible voter reminding them
to vote - Some people who attend aren't on any mailing list. (actually, it
is an interesting data point, but proba
Question, I wonder if we can get statistics on how many people who have
registered at this nanog have voted vs those who are not physically here?
This would help determine if putting a "voting desktop" outside of main
conference room help increase voting participation?
Also, possibly, instead of
Hello,
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, at 10:50, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 16-Oct-2007, at 0950, Betty J. Burke wrote:
>
>> Please encourage everyone to take advantage of the process ..
>>
>> Voting activity picked up a lot this morning, but if the level of
>> participation doesn't increase rapidly, w
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:03:36PM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> At 60 votes, that's .6% participation. If we don't hit at least 2, we
> ought to seriously consider disbanding the current "evolution".
If that means the disbanding of NANOG is that acceptable?
I think the numbers
At 60 votes, that's .6% participation. If we don't hit at least 2, we
ought to seriously consider disbanding the current "evolution".
-M<
On 10/16/07, Betty J. Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All:
>
> Please encourage everyone to take advantage of the process ..
>
> Voting activity picked up
On 16-Oct-2007, at 0950, Betty J. Burke wrote:
Please encourage everyone to take advantage of the process ..
Voting activity picked up a lot this morning, but if the level of
participation doesn't increase rapidly, we may have a lower
turnout than last year. I think last year we had about 1
Hi Jared:
A reminder regarding elections and the survey was also sent to
nanog-announce:>
Betty
--On Tuesday, October 16, 2007 12:03 PM -0400 Jared Mauch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did the election notice go out to everyone that is
in the current voter list? (I seem to recall it
Did the election notice go out to everyone that is
in the current voter list? (I seem to recall it's anyone
that attended in the past 2 years).
Perhaps a note to nanog-announce or similar would be
worthwhile.
- Jared
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:50:07AM -0400, Betty Burke
All:
Please encourage everyone to take advantage of the process ..
Voting activity picked up a lot this morning, but if the level of
participation doesn't increase rapidly, we may have a lower
turnout than last year. I think last year we had about 160 ballots cast.
Betty
10 matches
Mail list logo
