[nant-dev] Licensing

2003-10-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Trying to chime in with a bit of experience from seeing project migrate to the ASF. On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Clayton Harbour [EMAIL PROTECTED] On another note you mentioned license changes, I have always been curious how that works/ is accomplished? If

Re: [nant-dev] Problems with zip and fileset tasks

2003-10-09 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Giuseppe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:10 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Problems with zip and fileset tasks Gert, OK, I was using a three weeks old version... three weeks old ??? A lot can happen in

Re: [nant-dev] Problems with zip and fileset tasks

2003-10-09 Thread Giuseppe Greco
- Original Message - From: Giuseppe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:10 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Problems with zip and fileset tasks Gert, OK, I was using a three weeks old version... three weeks old ??? A lot can happen

Re: [nant-dev] Problems with zip and fileset tasks

2003-10-09 Thread Ian MacLean
Giuseppe, does a copy using the same fileset give the same result ie skip the LICENSE file ? If so then we know its somthing in the fileset code. Could you post a small sample demonstrating this behaviour ? Ian - Original Message - From: Giuseppe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen

Re: [nant-dev] Licensing

2003-10-09 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:54 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Licensing Thanks for the info Stefan, I tend to agree with you re FSF and associated philosophy. There

Re: [nant-dev] Licensing

2003-10-09 Thread Sascha Andres
Hi, * Am 09.10.2003 (18:18) schrieb Gert Driesen: There sould be no reason we can't get the licencing change in for the next release - assuming we can deal with any copyright holder issues. So now we need to make the official dicision as to which licence. I'm leaning towards BSD - what are

RE: [nant-dev] Licensing

2003-10-09 Thread Mitch Denny
+1 for BSD. But lets post it up here for everyones reference: license Copyright (c) 2003, NAnt Project All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: Redistributions of source

Re: [nant-dev] Problems with zip and fileset tasks

2003-10-09 Thread Giuseppe Greco
Ian, Gert, I've checked out and installed the last version and it works! There is just another issue. If one tries to redefine a fileset, the following error occurs: INTERNAL ERROR System.ArgumentException: Item has already been added. Key in dictionary: archive.set Key being added:

Re: [nant-dev] Problems with zip and fileset tasks

2003-10-09 Thread Ian MacLean
Giuseppe Greco wrote: Ian, Gert, I've checked out and installed the last version and it works! great ! Glad to hear its all working. As for fileset re-definitions - we allow properties to be re-defined to it probably makes sense to do the same for datatype references. If we agree that this

Re: [nant-dev] Problems with zip and fileset tasks

2003-10-09 Thread Giuseppe Greco
Giuseppe Greco wrote: Ian, Gert, I've checked out and installed the last version and it works! great ! Glad to hear its all working. As for fileset re-definitions - we allow properties to be re-defined to it probably makes sense to do the same for datatype references. If we agree that