Trying to chime in with a bit of experience from seeing project
migrate to the ASF.
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Clayton Harbour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On another note you mentioned license changes, I have always been
curious how that works/ is accomplished?
If
- Original Message -
From: Giuseppe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Problems with zip and fileset tasks
Gert,
OK, I was using a three weeks old version...
three weeks old ??? A lot can happen in
- Original Message -
From: Giuseppe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Problems with zip and fileset tasks
Gert,
OK, I was using a three weeks old version...
three weeks old ??? A lot can happen
Giuseppe,
does a copy using the same fileset give the same result ie skip the LICENSE file ?
If so then we know its somthing in the fileset code.
Could you post a small sample demonstrating this behaviour ?
Ian
- Original Message -
From: Giuseppe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Licensing
Thanks for the info Stefan,
I tend to agree with you re FSF and associated philosophy.
There
Hi,
* Am 09.10.2003 (18:18) schrieb Gert Driesen:
There sould be no reason we can't get the licencing change in for the
next release - assuming we can deal with any copyright holder issues.
So now we need to make the official dicision as to which licence. I'm
leaning towards BSD - what are
+1 for BSD. But lets post it up here for everyones reference:
license
Copyright (c) 2003, NAnt Project
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
met:
Redistributions of source
Ian, Gert,
I've checked out and installed the last version and
it works!
There is just another issue. If one tries to redefine
a fileset, the following error occurs:
INTERNAL ERROR
System.ArgumentException: Item has already been added. Key in dictionary:
archive.set Key being added:
Giuseppe Greco wrote:
Ian, Gert,
I've checked out and installed the last version and
it works!
great ! Glad to hear its all working.
As for fileset re-definitions - we allow properties to be re-defined to
it probably makes sense to do the same for datatype references. If we
agree that this
Giuseppe Greco wrote:
Ian, Gert,
I've checked out and installed the last version and
it works!
great ! Glad to hear its all working.
As for fileset re-definitions - we allow properties to be re-defined to
it probably makes sense to do the same for datatype references. If we
agree that
10 matches
Mail list logo