Bugs item #1423931, was opened at 2006-02-04 02:15
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by garyfx
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=402868aid=1423931group_id=31650
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Bugs item #1474159, was opened at 2006-04-21 07:50
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by garyfx
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=402868aid=1474159group_id=31650
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
There are currently no open P9 bugs. Only two bugs were submitted in
the first half of May, nine in all of April. Of the nine in April, two
were duplicates, one had already been fixed, one was user error, one has
been fixed, two are pending more information. I've marked one of them
postponed,
Bugs item #1474159, was opened at 2006-04-21 07:50
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by garyfx
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=402868aid=1474159group_id=31650
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gary Feldman
Sent: dinsdag 16 mei 2006 17:32
To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [nant-dev] Bug tracking status
There are currently no open P9 bugs. Only two bugs were submitted
Gert Driesen wrote:
Gary, were you able to reproduce this issue ? It's working fine here.
I think that the issue described by the submitter is due to the way command
line arguments for batch files are processed, and as such this has nothing
to do with NAnt itself.
I didn't try, because
Bugs item #1474159, was opened at 2006-04-21 13:50
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mike_at_rubicon
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=402868aid=1474159group_id=31650
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Great! I think NAnt needs new release badly. The fact, it has no stable
release for year or so hurt the project, imho.
Next thing we should do is VS2005 projects. I prefer msbuild integration
way, but its 0.86 or rather 0.9 matter!
btw: it'd be better to release atleast 2 or 4 version a year,
Bugs item #1417152, was opened at 2006-01-27 19:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by icnocop
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=402868aid=1417152group_id=31650
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
