Can't you just use the binaries from .NET 1.0 on Mono, too ?
You could just ignore some tasks, and it should be fine...
Jarek
- Original Message -
From: Scott Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 6:21 AM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Criteria
it from SF
CVS.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gert
Driesen
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 4:04 AM
To: John C Barstow; Nant-Dev
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Criteria for next release
- Original Message -
From: John C Barstow [EMAIL
Hello Jason,
MJ My vote would be for one distribution package with the binaries for each
MJ .NET framework in separate directories. I don't think that we should
MJ include the documentation or source in the distribution package. We
MJ should instead, direct users to the website for
That is a negative Jason. We will always distribute source with our binaries. We will
also always include help/documentation.
We will also not distribute multiple, and redundant, binaries. There is no reason to
distribute 1.0 and 1.1 compiled versions of nant.
Our goal is to support all .net
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Hernandez
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 10:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Criteria for next release
That is a negative Jason. We will always distribute source with our
binaries. We will also always include help
- Original Message -
From: John C Barstow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nant-Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 5:45 AM
Subject: [nant-dev] Criteria for next release
Now that I have access to an account that can post successfully to the
list, I think we should decide
