Hello Jason, MJ> My vote would be for one distribution package with the binaries for each MJ> .NET framework in separate directories. I don't think that we should MJ> include the documentation or source in the distribution package. We MJ> should instead, direct users to the website for documentation. I would MJ> include a readme doc that explains the basics of getting things setup MJ> (for the newbie), but again, refer to a task reference on the web.
MJ> From my perspective, if I want the source, I will just get it from SF MJ> CVS. IMO it is a really bad idea not to include the source in the distribution. It is not always possible to get the sources from SF CVS, because of having internet access through the firewall. Moreover, it is a bit harder to get the sources of stable release than the current sources (because you have to know the CVS tag of the last stable release) (probably, I'm wrong, but my experience of using CVS tells me that this is a possible problem). Do you think that documentation should be available for download as a single file (zip?) (in case, someone needs to read it offline)? -- Best regards, Ivan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
