That is a negative Jason. We will always distribute source with our binaries. We will
also always include help/documentation.

We will also not distribute multiple, and redundant, binaries. There is no reason to
distribute 1.0 and 1.1 compiled versions of nant.

Our goal is to support all .net platforms and frameworks. Right now NAnt has support 
for
the ms .net framework 1.0 and 1.1, as well as limited support for mono (as mono
progresses our available features are also growing). Our goal is to provide binaries
that meet the minimum framework requirements. In the future I expect our compiled
binaries will run on mono out of the dist directly, just like they do on the ms .net
frameworks.


<quote who="Morris, Jason">
> John,
>
> Thanks for taking up this task...any further progress on releasing the
> first beta or release candidate?
>
> My vote would be for one distribution package with the binaries for each
> .NET framework  in separate directories.  I don't think that we should
> include the documentation or source in the distribution package.  We
> should instead, direct users to the website for documentation.  I would
> include a readme doc that explains the basics of getting things setup
> (for the newbie), but again, refer to a task reference on the web.
>
> From my perspective, if I want the source, I will just get it from SF
> CVS.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Reply via email to