Dear all,
On [1] is a release candidate for NaviServer 4.99.16. Below is a -
preliminary -
summary of the changes since the last release. If you have urgent changes
for this release, please get in touch with me. If everything goes well,
the release
should follow early next week. Please test
Dear friends of NaviServer,
on sourceforge is a release candidate for NaviServer 4.99.14 (see [1]).
The version fixes essentially a few new and a few old bugs and continues
the ongoing code cleanup process. Also the portability is improved
(FreeBSD, OmniOS) and ns_connchan was stress-tested via
Ah, I think I found it. Never mind my question.
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 12:43 PM, Stephen Deasey sdea...@gmail.com wrote:
You're not checking the tarball (which is what we distribute), you're
checking a CVS checkout.
You need to:
cvs export naviserver
cd naviserver
./autogen.sh ...
make
Just (dist-)compiled on an Ubuntu 7.04, tomorrow I'll give it a try on a
SuSE Enterprise Linux (all 32bit).
tomorrow never dies...
I just dist-compiled on the SuSE Enterprise and it was all smooth jazz.
Bernd.
-
This
On 5/21/07, Bernd Eidenschink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just (dist-)compiled on an Ubuntu 7.04, tomorrow I'll give it a try on a
SuSE Enterprise Linux (all 32bit).
tomorrow never dies...
I just dist-compiled on the SuSE Enterprise and it was all smooth jazz.
Anyone test on a FreeBSD box
Hi guys,
if we want to make release this year, we need to finish docs, i just
cant make myself to finish it:-((
We have these pages to replace example text, of course the rest of
manuals desire to be better but at least they have something.
ns_limits_get.man
ns_limits_list.man
Am 03.02.2006 um 02:49 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:
Just as an idea, Zoran, when you are ready to release 4.99.1, it
could be a good idea to make a release on freshmeat.net as well.
Also, can we make modules subdir as a separate .tar.gz as well?
I see no reason why not.
For naviserver, we have a
OTOH, have you ever looked at doctools?
Not too much, but as I read here:
http://wiki.tcl.tk/3054
the conversions should be easy:
dtp doc html your_manpage your_manpage.html
dtp doc nroff your_manpage your_manpage.n
dtp doc text your_manpage your_manpage.txt
And seems there's also latex
Hi!
I want to ask you for your opinion on a few things:
a) Documentation
AFAIK the status was to ask Andreas Kupries for (small?) modification of the
doctools to be able to make smart C-Function documentation.
Zoran: Can you tell if your suggestions will be (or are) accepted?
To me it would
Am 04.07.2005 um 08:45 schrieb Bernd Eidenschink:
Hi!
I want to ask you for your opinion on a few things:
a) Documentation
AFAIK the status was to ask Andreas Kupries for (small?)
modification of the
doctools to be able to make smart C-Function documentation.
Zoran: Can you tell if your
This way or another, it seems that if we'd have a wiki-html and
wiki-nroff converters at hand, we could trash doctools... But I
do not know if any of those already exists. OK, the wiki-html
should already be there, otherwise wiki would not work ;-)
But, what about wiki-nroff ?
Hm, the
Am 04.07.2005 um 16:45 schrieb Bernd Eidenschink:
This way or another, it seems that if we'd have a wiki-html and
wiki-nroff converters at hand, we could trash doctools... But I
do not know if any of those already exists. OK, the wiki-html
should already be there, otherwise wiki would not work
Don't know if this is useful:
http://hula-project.org/Wiki_Conversion
Our idea is that there be a script on the wiki server that autogenerates
PDFs of the admin guide, the user guide, and any other large-scale
documentation, suitable for printing and binding and admiring and
Hi. There's a couple of things I've been working on which I though
would be good additions for a first release, but I ran into a few
problems and I haven't time to get them working. So if y'all are
happy to cut a tarball now, that's fine with me.
Re the numbering, I thought 4.99.0 suggested
On 5/5/05, Bernd Eidenschink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 04.05.2005 um 16:45 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:
We just do not have Web site, at least first page with some details
would be nice. I guess, hosting on sourceforge gives us html version
of web page only.
Bernd can take this on his
Am 05.05.2005 um 16:49 schrieb Bernd Eidenschink:
Yes. I will set up naviserver the next days on a server already
intended for
the website. We could use www.servercult.com/naviserver or smth. like
that as
we have this domain already. But this is not so important as we can
change it
to
Am 04.05.2005 um 16:45 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:
We just do not have Web site, at least first page with some details
would be nice. I guess, hosting on sourceforge gives us html version
of web page only.
Bernd can take this on his shoulders, I think. Bernd?
Yes. I will set up naviserver the
Hi friends,
I have updated our product to use NaviServer now. It will be
distributed as
update to about 500 installations worldwide.
I have tested it thoroughly and apart from the (already noted)
ns_urlencode
(incompatibility) it seems that other things are backward-compatible
with the
I agree we can make public release, we wanted to do this with docs but
it may take longer, so public release with official use in commercial
product could be enough reason to make first appearance.
We just do not have Web site, at least first page with some details
would be nice. I guess,
Any ideas what? Stephen suggested 4.99. Why not use that? Or more
radically, 5.0 as we
do have virtual hosting now which can justify the release bump.
Okay, 4.99 and we'll switch to 5.0 when docs will be ready.
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
20 matches
Mail list logo
