The Host Resources MIB [RFC1514] provides two status objects that can be used
to describe the status of a printer: hrDeviceStatus and hrPrinterStatus.
What you need is to implement this MIB in the printer. My question is How to
implement this over HP printer. it is done in Ricoh 4500 and 4510,
Dave Shield wrote:
> On 19/12/06, Alan Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Why can't we put hostname as the 1st command-line argument under Solaris?
>
> I'd actually ask the opposite question - how come this works under Linux?
Apart from that, the reason is probably the different getopt() impleme
On 19/12/06, Alan Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why can't we put hostname as the 1st command-line argument under Solaris?
I'd actually ask the opposite question - how come this works under Linux?
The documentation specifies that option flags should come *before* the
positional parameters (ho
Hello,
I was hoping someone could help me figuring out why snmpwalk (5.4)
parsing command-line arguments differently under Solaris than Linux.
Under Solaris:
"snmpwalk hostname -c community_string -v 2c OID" would return an error:
No community name specified.
USAGE: snmpwalk [OPTIONS] AGENT [O
Hello ,
I've problem in version net SNMP 5.2.2 in sending traps,
I've configure the agent to send 2 kinds of traps V1 and V2 ,when I send
trap using the api send_v2trap(&var_trap)
I've got in my mib browser two traps : version 1 and version 2.
I've expected that the agent will send only the trap
On 19/12/06, K.M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have Hp DeskJet 5550 , I would like to check printer status through the
> Host resources MIB. When I tried it doesn't work it is just gave me all the
> time the same values.. how i can implement SNMP Agent on it ?
Quite honestly, I doubt it's practi
Desc: not available
Url :
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders/attachments/20061219/f604afb6/attachment.bin
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: snmp_sess_add_ex-clear-SNMP_FLAGS_DONT_PROBE
Type: text/x-patch
Size:
> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TA> It may break packaging for those who forcibly run "autoconf" when
TA> building (and only very few systems already ship 2.61). OTOH, it
TA> may make life easier for core developers. I'd propose to update
TA> MAIN first and see how it goes.
> "GSM" == G S Marzot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GSM> If no one else has a supporting/dissenting opinion on this I
GSM> suppose I will have to defer to the status quo as proposed by wes
GSM> (5.0401)...though this seems over large and over restrictive
GSM> on what libsnmp releases it will
If no one else has a supporting/dissenting opinion on this I suppose I will have
to defer to the status quo as proposed by wes (5.0401)...though this seems
over large and over restrictive on what libsnmp releases it will run with...if
you have an opinion, now might be a good time to share it.
10 matches
Mail list logo