On 08/14/18 08:56, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> As one can see on
>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/BVanAssche87257/net-snmp
>> the build of the Net-SNMP master branch
>> passes for MSVC-2017,
>
> Really? From:
>
> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/BVanAssche87257/net-snmp/buil
Bart Van Assche wrote:
As one can see on https://ci.appveyor.com/project/BVanAssche87257/net-snmp
the build of the Net-SNMP master branch
passes for MSVC-2017,
Really? From:
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/BVanAssche87257/net-snmp/build/job/shuwoe93gfu2af2t
just now (search for 'error C20
On 08/13/18 05:37, Gisle Vanem via Net-snmp-coders wrote:
It's been > 3 years since I've compiled using MinGW.
Now I'm sticking more to clang-cl and MSVC and notice
the support for MSVC wrt. to IPv6 is in a real (excuse my
French) shitty state. E.g. the '{ }' syntax is not allowed
on MSVC:
#if
Hi Magnus,
Thanks for the input.
Will get back to you after testing .
Thanks
Giridhar
-Original Message-
From: Magnus Fromreide [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 3:33 AM
To: AR, Giridhar
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: IPV6
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 17:43 +, AR, Giridhar wrote:
> ...
>
> But select system call is getting timedout for ipv6 address, Due to
> this traps are not received.
> timeout is set to 5 seonds, its code looks like
I assume the following is running inside of an infinite loop, is that
correct?
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 08:29 +, AR, Giridhar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are not able to receive traps on ipv6 address in my application.
> Our application is not able to open the Traplistener on IPv6 on Suse
> SLES 11, Redhat 5.6 and Windows Server 2008 R2.
> We have set the preferred address as I
I think parts of my last message were cut off. I'll try again.
We are in the process of updating our agent/MIB to support both IPv4 and IPv6
addresses. As well as the agent itself,
our proprietary MIB specifies a number of external IP addresses e.g. the
address of a syslog client. Looking at the
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:42:38 +0200, Martin Knappe
> said:
MK> I have a very general question for a start. It seems to me that IPv6
MK> connectivity is not currently supported by net-snmp, is that correct?
MK> I was not able to:
Did you run configure with --enable-ipv6 command line opt
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:42:38PM +0200, Martin Knappe wrote:
> I have a very general question for a start. It seems to me that IPv6
> connectivity is not currently supported by net-snmp, is that correct?
No.
> I was not able to:
>
> 1) set up the snmp-agent to listen on v6-addresses and respon
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Steve Friedl wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:42:38PM +0200, Martin Knappe wrote:
> > I have a very general question for a start. It seems to me that IPv6
> > connectivity is not currently supported by net-snmp, is that correct?
> > I was not able to:
> >
> > 1
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:42:38PM +0200, Martin Knappe wrote:
> I have a very general question for a start. It seems to me that IPv6
> connectivity is not currently supported by net-snmp, is that correct?
> I was not able to:
>
> 1) set up the snmp-agent to listen on v6-addresses and respond to r
I have upgraded to current git version. Now the ipv6 entries are ready
filled.
But "make test" fails for 9 test cases!
This was the requested part of config.log:
configure:17870: checking for mib2_ipIfStatsEntry_t
configure:17870: result: no
configure:17900: checking ipv6 stack type
conft
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:26:58 +0200 Claus wrote:
CK> while working on my UBUNTU linux system with net-snmp V5.7 I missed most
CK> of the IPv6 configuration at the MIBII if, ip, and route-tables.
CK> So I tested the the net-snmp V5.6 with the same configuration and it
CK> works fine!
Can you check
reide [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: April 27, 2010 6:08 PM
To: Ron Bets
Cc: Net SNMP Coders ([email protected])
Subject: Re: IPv6 transport on Solaris
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 12:37 -0700, Ron Bets wrote:
> Hey there. I have previously posted a question regarding us
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 12:37 -0700, Ron Bets wrote:
> Hey there. I have previously posted a question regarding using IPv6
> transport with Net SNMP on Solaris. I have since built 5.4.2.1 with
> -enable-ipv6 and everything did build OK, it seems. So the next
> obvious question is, how do I open a
> On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:00:26 +0530, Deepali Singalkar
> said:
DS> Further when I issue the snmpget command with ipv6 address as specified in
DS> the response to FAQ_Application 28
DS> snmpget -v 3 -n '' -l authPriv -u myuser -A my_password 'udp6:[::1]:161' -l
DS> authNoPriv sysUpTime.0
First of all you dont want to enable ./configure
--with-mib-modules="mibII/ipv6"
I think you are not doing anything with mib modules. Then try to run
agent/snmpd
On 5/30/09, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 18:51 +0530, prasanth K S wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> I am r
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 18:51 +0530, prasanth K S wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I am running net-snmp 5.4.2.1 on slackware 12 and i want
> it to be configured for the IPV6 also so the steps which i followed
> are given below in detail:
>
> CONFIGURATION:
>
> 1) ./configure
[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn
and offer advice. Thanks. ]
2009/5/
2009/5/28 prasanth K S :
> I am running the daemon as /usr/local/bin/snmpd udp:161,udp6:161 -L -f -d
>
> and the error which i am getting is like this
>
> getaddrinfo: udp6 Name or service not known
> Error opening specified End Pont "udp6:161"
> Server Exiting with co
2008/6/16 Chase Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've found the exact same bug ...
> but in snmplib/snmpTCPIPv6Domain.c instead of snmplib/snmpUDPIPv6Domain.c.
Thanks for the report.
I've fixed this in the 5.3.x lines and above.
We're currently in code freeze for the 5.2.5 release,
so fixing that l
Hex it's the standard way to display IPv6 address.
--- Maneesh Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using ASN_OCTET_STR for ipv6 address. But MIB
> browser displays the IPv6 address in hex format.
>
> For IPv4 address, ASN_IPADDRESS is used, the output
> is displayed is A.B.C.D form
---Original Message-
From: Thomas Anders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 7:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IPv6 support not enabled on Solaris 9 when building Net-SNMP_5.3.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> netsnmp_udp6_getSecName: resolve <"SNMP_COMMUNITY-61",
> fe80::203:baff:fe2a:a645>
> netsnmp_udp6_getSecName: compare <"SNMP-COMMUNITY-61",
> 0x/0xffbfed00>... nope
> netsnmp_udp6_getSecName: compare <"SNMP_COMMUNITY-62",
> 0x/0x
--Original Message-
From: Thomas Anders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IPv6 support not enabled on Solaris 9 when building Net-SNMP_5.3.1
[EMAIL PR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ./snmpd -d -p udp:161,udp6:1161
Why "-p"? This option is meant to be used for
-p FILE store process id in FILE
which means that "udp:161,udp6:1161" would be treated as a filename
rather than a transport identifier. Please try again with
./snmpd -d -f -
now getting timeout.
Sincerely,
Rahul K
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Shield
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 1:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IPv6 support no
On 06/09/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The output is "No match".
> For example
>
> COMMAND -> snmpget -v1 -c SNMP_COMMUNITY-61 udp6:[fe80::203:baff:fe2a:a645]
> sysName.0
> OUTPUT -> No match
That feels like a shell error, rather than an SNMP one.
I suspect that snmpget is ne
PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: IPv6 support not enabled on Solaris 9 when building Net-SNMP_5.3.1
Hi,
The output is "No match".
For example
COMMAND -> snmpget -v1 -c SNMP_COMMUNITY-61 udp6:[fe80::203:baff:fe2a:a64
s Anders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 10:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: IPv6 support not enabled on Solaris 9 when building Net-SNMP_5.3.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> IPv6:
> a) snmpget -v1 -c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> IPv6:
> a) snmpget -v1 -c SNMP_COMMUNITY-61 udp6:[fe80::203:baff:fe2a:a645] sysName.0
> -> No match - NOT OK
> b) snmpget -v1 -c SNMP_COMMUNITY-62 udp6:[fe80::203:baff:fe2a:a645] sysName.0
> -> No match - NOT OK
What exactly is the output here?
Anyway, I'm sorry to co
>Thomas Anders wrote:
>I can reproduce your problem and confirm that this is a bug. I've checked >in a
>fix for CVS MAIN that should allow you to build net-snmp on Solaris (and >AIX,
>Tru64, ...) with support for the UDPIPv6/TCPIPv6 transports. The mibII/ipv6
>>MIB
>module still won't be supported
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We are not able to enable IPv6 support on Solaris 9 when building
> Net-SNMP_5.3.1
I can reproduce your problem and confirm that this is a bug. I've checked in a
fix for CVS MAIN that should allow you to build net-snmp on Solaris (and AIX,
Tru64, ...) with support for t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please provide help/pointers to enable Net-SNMP IPv6 support on Solaris 9.
Thanks for providing a proper problem report. A few more things to check (and
report back):
1) grep -i inet6 include/net-snmp/net-snmp-config.h
2) net-snmp-config --cflags
3) lsof -p (if you don
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:59:14 -0500 Nathan wrote:
NN> $ ./snmptrapd -M ../../mibs -f -Le udp6:3
NN>
NN> 2005-10-27 16:12:50 NET-SNMP version 5.2.1.2 Started.
NN> couldn't open udp6:3 -- errno 2 ("No such file or directory")
That error makes me think that snmptrapd doesn't have the udp6 tra
Help with the problem described below please! I'm reading the stack's code now
to see what's going on...
Thanks,
Nhan Nguyen
Original Message --------
Subject: Re: IPv6 with NET-SNMP
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 17:33:17 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 08:02:22 -0700 (PDT) Ganesh wrote:
GCN> I had 2 questions :
Which you posted on both lists. I responded on the users list recently.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:59:01 -0400, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Robert> Interesting. I can't find 'udp4' in any header or source
Robert> file. Maybe there is a strcmp that only checks 3 bytes
Robert> somewhere... In cvs-main, I get:
Robert> Error opening specified endpoint "udp4
RS> Interesting. I can't find 'udp4' in any header or source file. Maybe
there is a
RS> strcmp that only checks 3 bytes somewhere... In cvs-main, I get:
RS> Error opening specified endpoint "udp4:1161"
udp4 doesn't exist. It uses udp for IPv4 and upd6 for IPv6, like
udp:161,udp6:161
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:08:01 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> Robert> Actually, there is no 'udp4' token.
WH>
WH> Hmmm... that wasn't my recollection. And it isn't my just tested
WH> experience.
WH>
WH> running snmpd by default only opens v4. running with
WH> udp4:161,udp6:161 allows me to query via v6 su
Robert>> Actually, there is no 'udp4' token. I believe the way it
Robert>> *should* work is that 'udp' should open both, while udp6 would
Robert>> just be IPv6. To only allow v4 if v6 is configure would
Robert>> require using access control..
WH-> running snmpd by default only opens v4. running w
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:59:17 -0400, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Robert> Actually, there is no 'udp4' token. I believe the way it
Robert> *should* work is that 'udp' should open both, while udp6 would
Robert> just be IPv6. To only allow v4 if v6 is configure would
Robert> require us
On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:08:58 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> Fong> Does anybody know how to solve this problem? I guess, this probably
WH> Fong> is OS issue. But hope somebody had the same issue and knew the
WH> Fong> answer. I need to use IPv6 port but be able to query IPv4 too.
WH>
WH> You should specify
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:18:32 -0700, "Fong Tsui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Fong> It used to work when I launch snmpd on udp6:161 and query data for IPv4
Fong> on Redhat 9.0. After I upgrade my OS to Enterprise Linux OS, I can't
Fong> query IPv4 anymore if snmpd is on udp6:161. Tcp still works
l 05, 2005 10:54 AM
> To: Srini Kode
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: IPv6 testing
>
> >>>>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:00:13 -0800, "Srini Kode"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:00:13 -0800, "Srini Kode" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Srini> snmpget -v 2c -D All -c public udp6:[fe80::205:30ff:fe00:2309]161
sysDescr.0
Srini> This means the network management application must give udp6 and the port
Srini> number number 161 also when they query. Is
Dave Shield wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 17:33, Robert Story wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:42:26 -0500 Alex wrote:
AB> Another option is to compile 2 (or 4 if SSL) ways and include them all
AB> in the binary installer. The user can then pick what support they want
AB> during installation. That
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:36:25 -0500 Andy wrote:
AS> > Uggh. How about a mini-installer that asks which they want, then
AS> > downloads the appropriate file? (lots of installers are doing that these
AS> > days).
AS>
AS> That would be prettier than mashing them all into one installer.
Well, we've go
Robert Story wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:42:26 -0500 Alex wrote:
AB> Another option is to compile 2 (or 4 if SSL) ways and include them all
AB> in the binary installer. The user can then pick what support they want
AB> during installation. That would of course make the .exe 2 or 4 times
AB>
Alex Burger wrote:
Robert Story wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:24:23 -0500 Alex wrote:
AB> Windows XP with service pack 1 includes a production quality
version of AB> IPv6. There is IPv6 support before sp1, but it is not
considered AB> production quality.
Well, that's a good enough reason not to
Robert Story wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:24:23 -0500 Alex wrote:
AB> Windows XP with service pack 1 includes a production quality version of
AB> IPv6. There is IPv6 support before sp1, but it is not considered
AB> production quality.
Well, that's a good enough reason not to put it in our bina
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 17:33, Robert Story wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:42:26 -0500 Alex wrote:
> AB> Another option is to compile 2 (or 4 if SSL) ways and include them all
> AB> in the binary installer. The user can then pick what support they want
> AB> during installation. That would of co
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:42:26 -0500 Alex wrote:
AB> Another option is to compile 2 (or 4 if SSL) ways and include them all
AB> in the binary installer. The user can then pick what support they want
AB> during installation. That would of course make the .exe 2 or 4 times
AB> larger so it would g
Robert Story wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:24:23 -0500 Alex wrote:
AB> Windows XP with service pack 1 includes a production quality version of
AB> IPv6. There is IPv6 support before sp1, but it is not considered
AB> production quality.
Well, that's a good enough reason not to put it in our bina
x27;;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: IPv6 on Linux
>
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:56:04 -0800 Srini wrote:
> SK> Now I compiled with v6 option and ran the following
> command from a
> SK> linux box. I get following error.
> SK> bash-2.05a$ ./snmpget -v 2c -c p
AB> I can create another Windows binary with IPv6 support and we can post
AB> both of them. Any objections to having two Windows binaries?
AB>
AB> I would also like to have OpenSSL support in the binary as there is a
AB> pre-compiled OpenSSL DLL available (so we will not have to include it
AB>
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:56:04 -0800 Srini wrote:
SK> Now I compiled with v6 option and ran the following command from a linux
SK> box. I get following error.
SK> bash-2.05a$ ./snmpget -v 2c -c public -D ALL
SK> udp6:[fe80::205:30ff:fe00:2309/64]:161 sysDescr.0
Try w/out the mask ('/64'). eg
snm
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:24:23 -0500 Alex wrote:
AB> Windows XP with service pack 1 includes a production quality version of
AB> IPv6. There is IPv6 support before sp1, but it is not considered
AB> production quality.
Well, that's a good enough reason not to put it in our binaries. I say we
conti
Now I compiled with v6 option and ran the following command from a linux
box. I get following error.
bash-2.05a$ ./snmpget -v 2c -c public -D ALL
udp6:[fe80::205:30ff:fe00:2309/64]:161 sysDescr.0
...
..
..
trace: snmp_call_callbacks(): callback.c, 218:
callback: calling a callback fo
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:29:46 -0800 Srini wrote:
SK> On Linux when I compile the net-snmp-5.1 with v6 option, does it also
SK> Build the apps (snmpget, snmpsetetc) also with this option.
SK> i.e. would snmpget, snmpgetnext, snmpset apps, would they be v6 capable?
Yes.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNM
>
> Robert Story wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:49:20 -0800 Srini wrote:
> > Ok, so apparently the windows binary doesn't include IPv6 support.
> > You'll have to build your own. Hopefully our windows gurus
> can speak
> > up as to why this is so.
>
Ok. Looks like I cannot use the window
Robert Story wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:49:20 -0800 Srini wrote:
Ok, so apparently the windows binary doesn't include IPv6 support. You'll have
to build your own. Hopefully our windows gurus can speak up as to why this is
so.
Windows XP with service pack 1 includes a production quality version o
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:49:20 -0800 Srini wrote:
SK> >
SK> > On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:35:52 -0800 Srini wrote:
SK> > SK> Now from a windows system I am issuing a "snmpget" to the target,
SK> > SK> where the above image (v6 capable) is running. following
SK> > is the command I issued:
SK> > SK>
SK>
>
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:35:52 -0800 Srini wrote:
> SK> Now from a windows system I am issuing a "snmpget" to the target,
> SK> where the above image (v6 capable) is running. following
> is the command I issued:
> SK>
> SK> snmpget -v 2c -c sritest -D ALL
> udp6:[fe80::205:30ff:fe00:2309]:1
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:35:52 -0800 Srini wrote:
SK> Now from a windows system I am issuing a "snmpget" to the target, where the
SK> above image (v6 capable) is running. following is the command I issued:
SK>
SK> snmpget -v 2c -c sritest -D ALL udp6:[fe80::205:30ff:fe00:2309]:161
SK> sysDescr.0
SK
Hi, Srini.
From: "Srini Kode" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IPv6 on Linux
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:35:52 -0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
skode> Hi,
skode>
skode> I am using net-snmp-5.1. I built the image with ipv6 enabled. and started
skode> snmpd as:
skode> snmpd udp6:161 on a target.
s
> Same question ask weeks ago... noone seems to know
> or is willig to answer!
But your question wasn't quite the same.
Srini appeared to be asking about using IPv6 as a *transport*
mechanism, for transmitting SNMP requests to and from the agent.
As Robert replied, that's supported using
con
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:00:01 -0700 Srini wrote:
SK> For a new platform we ar planning to support IPv6 and for snmp we plan to
SK> use net-snmp.
SK> Does net-snmp support IPv6?
Yes, on some platforms. (No, I don't know which ones work and which don't.)
Configure with --enable-ipv6, and it will tel
If it doesn't make sense to your guys, it is probably not a way to go then.
Thanks
Fong
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 4:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fong Tsui
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: IPv6 transpo
->RS Interesting... so if snmpd is started with udp6, it will receive packets
addressed to an IPv4 address (a.b.c.d)? Or just an IPv6 format IPv4 address
(::fff:a.b.c)?
It is ::fff:a.b.c for IPv4.
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.
eived ?
-Mike S.
>
> From: Robert Story (Coders) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2004/08/22 Sun PM 11:08:19 EDT
> To: "Fong Tsui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: IPv6 transport vs IPv4 access control
>
> On Fri, 20 Aug 2004
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:49:34 -0700 Fong wrote:
FT> Currently if snmpd agent is launched on IPv6 transport, both IPv6 and IPv4
FT> addresses can access it. However, access control in snmpd.conf
FT> distinguishes between IPv6 (eg. rwcommunity6) and IPv4(eg. rwcommunity). If
FT> snmpd is launched IPv6
Sorry forget the patch. Here it is.
-Original Message-
From: Fong Tsui
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 1:50 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: IPv6 transport vs IPv4 access control
Hi, greetings,
Currently if snmpd agent is launched on IPv6 transport, both IPv6 and IPv4 addresses
can a
kernel.
Thanks,
Fong
-Original Message-
From: Robert Story (Coders) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 2:36 PM
To: Fong Tsui
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fong Tsui
Subject: Re: IPV6 support for Linux
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:31:41 -0700 Fong wrote:
FT> I have tr
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:31:41 -0700 Fong wrote:
FT> I have tried v5.1.2.rc2, it still can't launch as
FT> snmpd udp:161,tcp:161,udp6:161,tcp6:161
It appears that it won't allow tcp:161 and tcp6:161 at the same time. That is a
bug that should be written up. Unfortunately, I don't have time for furt
Fong,
Please send replies ONLY to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The net-snmp developers have plainly stated before that they
do not have large IPv6 network to test against. This means that
if you don't learn ways to provide better problem reports for
the issues which you have, you won't be pleased with the
Title: RE: IPV6 support for Linux
Robert,
I have tried v5.1.2.rc2, it still can't launch as
snmpd udp:161,tcp:161,udp6:161,tcp6:161
Thanks,
Fong
-Original Message- From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Fong Tsui
Sent: Wed 8/18/2004 3:51 PM To:
[EMAIL PROTECTE
) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 10:07 PM
To: Fong Tsui
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ling, Xiaofeng
Subject: Re: IPV6 support for Linux
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 10:56:43 -0700 Fong wrote:
FT> Is it a known issue there is a problem to launch Ipv6 and ipv4
FT> together?
It works
IPv6 works itself, only not able to launch combination of IPv4 and IPv6 together.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Story (Coders) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 10:07 PM
To: Fong Tsui
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ling, Xiaofeng
Subject: Re: IPV6 support for Linux
On
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 10:56:43 -0700 Fong wrote:
FT> Is it a known issue there is a problem to launch Ipv6 and ipv4 together?
It works in the main line CVS, so I'd guess it should work in 5.1.2 as well.
FT> It seems it only gets the first type of trapsport. I am using 5.0.9.
FT> Any help is appreci
Ling, Xiaofeng; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: IPV6 support for Linux
>
>Hi, Xiaofeng,
>
>Is it a known issue there is a problem to launch Ipv6 and ipv4
>together?
>I tried
>
>snmpd -c /home/tsui/snmpd.conf udp6:161,udp:161 but it can't
>be up. The log says,
>
ening specified endpoint "udp6:161"
It seems it only gets the first type of trapsport. I am using 5.0.9.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Fong
-Original Message-
From: Ling, Xiaofeng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 2:37 AM
To: Fong Tsui; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:53:48 +0700, Le Dinh An <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Le> However, I'm working on the lastest revision of ipv6.c from the
Le> CVS, which doesn't contain code for those tables on Linux. I'm
Le> new to *BSD and programming, that makes me lost in reading the
Le> implementati
Thanks, Wes.
However, I'm working on the lastest revision of ipv6.c from the CVS,
which doesn't contain code for those tables on Linux.
I'm new to *BSD and programming, that makes me lost in reading the
implementation code, especially on traversing the linked list and
generating OID names :(.
T
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:46:30 +0700, Le Dinh An <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Le> I'm having to implement this on Linux, but it looks vague to me. I
Le> found this subject on the list archive, hoping some one out there
Le> could give me some hints.
First off, you definitely need to look into the
Hi all,
I'm having to implement this on Linux, but it looks vague to me. I found
this subject on the list archive, hoping some one out there could give
me some hints.
I see that some kind of linked list of struct should be generated from
the contents of /proc/net/ipv6_route. But then how is thi
> I can't seem to get the IPv6 stuff working correctly.
> snmpget -v 1 fe80::210:40ff:fe03:3411 system.sysLocation.0
First of all, you'll need to explicitly specify that this is an
IPv6 address. Try
snmpget -v 1 udp6:fe80::210:40ff:fe03:3411 system.sysLocation.0
Secondly, have you set up th
Have you launch it as:
snmpd udp6:161
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 11:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: IPv6
I can't seem to get the IPv6 stuff wo
4 7:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IPv6
From: Niels Baggesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPv6
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:43:57 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
nba> On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 05:20:50PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
nba> > Isn't ::1 for localhos
From: Niels Baggesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPv6
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:43:57 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
nba> On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 05:20:50PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nba> > Isn't ::1 for localhost?
nba>
nba> Yes
nba>
nba>
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 05:20:50PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Isn't ::1 for localhost?
Yes
> That is a good place to start, but ultimately I will need to use a full IPv6
> address for a remote SNMP agent.
>
> Would that be similar, in that you just replace ::1 with the full IPv6
> addres
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 4:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IPv6
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 03:09:40PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Do the net-snmp tools support IPv6 ?
If your OS supports it, and if you enabled it during configure
> If so, w
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 03:09:40PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Do the net-snmp tools support IPv6 ?
If your OS supports it, and if you enabled it during configure
> If so, what command line switch would I give , say, snmpget?
snmpget ::1 sysDescr.0
/Niels
--
Niels Baggesen - @home - Årh
93 matches
Mail list logo
