Re: rfc: log handling

2005-06-27 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:42:58 -0400, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: DS> Check http://www.net-snmp.org/dev/schedule.html for the identity DS> of the 5.1.x release manager :-) Robert> I know I'm in charge of 5.1.3, but don't know that I should Robert> imply that I'm not in charge of th

Re: rfc: log handling

2005-06-27 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:40:06 -0400, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Robert> Hmm.. I guess that would be Wes, who hasn't spoken up. He'd Robert> better speak up soon, or the 5.1.3 release engineer will make Robert> an executive decision. Robert> Anyone else care to weigh in on the iss

Re: rfc: log handling

2005-06-22 Thread Robert Story
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:43:15 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40, Robert Story wrote: DS> > On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:47:35 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> > DS> If you can convince the manager of the 5.1.x line, that's fine by me. DS> > DS> > Hmm.. I guess that would be Wes, who hasn't spoken up

Re: rfc: log handling

2005-06-22 Thread Dave Shield
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40, Robert Story wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:47:35 +0100 Dave wrote: > DS> If you can convince the manager of the 5.1.x line, that's fine by me. > > Hmm.. I guess that would be Wes, who hasn't spoken up. Nope. Wes is release manager for 5.0.x (and the main development

Re: rfc: log handling

2005-06-22 Thread Robert Story
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:47:35 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> > DS> > Now, what about older releases? DS> > DS> 5.1.x - Ummm not sure. DS> > DS> I'm happy to leave that decision to the 5.1.x line manager :-) DS> > DS> > Well, not honoring the enabled flag (5.1.2 status) definitely seems like DS> >

Re: rfc: log handling

2005-06-22 Thread Dave Shield
> DS> What happens if the logging settings are changed dynamically (e.g via > DS> the nsLoggingTable), and then the agent is restarted? > > By restarted, I assume you mean re-configured (eg HUP)? Yup. > DS> Does it revert to the previous logging configuration (i.e. as at agent > DS> start tim

Re: rfc: log handling

2005-06-21 Thread Robert Story
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:31:04 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> > DS> if (!get_logh_head()) DS> > DS> snmp_enable_filelog( LOGFILE ); DS> > DS> > Ok. The only change I'd make there is to actually scan the log handlers DS> > to make sure one was enabled.. DS> [...] DS> Although the logging handlers

Re: rfc: log handling

2005-06-21 Thread Dave Shield
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 21:15, Robert Story wrote: > DS>When I submitted the modular logging > DS> code, this included the minimal changes needed for the agent to > DS> make use of it. I didn't rip out all of the agent-specific > DS> logging code and replace it with fully new

Re: rfc: log handling

2005-06-20 Thread Robert Story
DS> Just to check - are you talking about logging from the SNMP agent DS> specifically, or more generally about the underlying library log DS> routines. DS> DS> > By default, a standard logfile has always been opened DS> > (/var/log/snmpd.log). DS> DS> That sounds like the agent's logging in part

Re: rfc: log handling

2005-06-20 Thread Dave Shield
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 22:11, Robert Story wrote: > With the introduction of the new log handling mechanism (linked list of log > handler, instead of a single instance of each type), some new issues have > arisen. I'd like to start a discussion on how to deal with them. Just to check - are you talk