> From: Arulkumar Ponnusamy [mailto:parul@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 10:04 PM
> I have installed the net-snmp5.5 on my windows machine and
> configured the snmp agent.
> My snmp agent is running fine. When i try to do snmpwalk for IPv6
> related mibs i am getting
>
I'm trying to build net-snmp v5.4.1 from source, linking in our
FIPS-enabled OpenSSL libraries v0.9.8. The configure step always fails,
claiming that it can't find the encryption libraries, despite having
access to all the correct local include & lib directories (verified
through config.log exam
Hello,
I have 3 tables, table1, table2 and table3. They have OIDs ending with 1.x, 2.x
and 3.x respectively. When I direct the mib browser (I'm using ireasoning) to
fetch table1 data 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 etc, it fetches table1 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 data. When
I direct the browser to use table2 (2.1, 2.2, 2.3..
Hi,
Any type of response or acknowledgement would be appreciated.
Zapo
- Original Message -
From: IanA
To: Support Net-SNMP
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 8:43 AM
Subject: Net-SNMP 5.5 tcpConnTable problem
Hi,
I hope I am not double-posting, but I did not see this post of 21-Jul-10 i
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Cameron Smith wrote:
> snmpd quickly dies after start with the error on status:
> snmpd dead but pid file exists
>
> I have gone through the remove/reinstall and confirmed at latest for the
> distro I am on which works fine for all my other devices and virtual
> c
snmpd quickly dies after start with the error on status:
snmpd dead but pid file exists
I have gone through the remove/reinstall and confirmed at latest for the
distro I am on which works fine for all my other devices and virtual
containers.
Any info on how I can trouble shoot this would be great
On 28/07/2010 10:17, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 28 July 2010 14:06, Roberto Greiner wrote:
>> Based on
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg20966.html,
>> I tried to add "dontLogTCPWrappersConnects 1" in my snmpd.conf file ...
>
>> /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf: line 28:
The only issue I am aware of is the one where the length is > 128.
I think Silvercreek does a lot of "negative" testing and I guess expects
an agent to respond in a certain way. In this case they expect the agent
to see that the number is > 128 and handle it not as though it was 0.
-Original
Dave,
It turns out that these entries are not working anyway, so they are probably
ignored.
I know its reading this config fie since changes to it does affect results.
Do you see anything else that's wrong?
Roger
-Original Message-
From: dave.shi...@googlemail.com [mailto:dave.shi..
On 28 July 2010 15:48, Joan Landry wrote:
> I am able to reproduce this problem using any value over 128 as the
> length of the sub identifier of an Octet String:
The maximum length of a valid OID is 128.
Anything longer than that is simply not legitimate.
I was actually asking about your other
Dave,
I am able to reproduce this problem using any value over 128 as the
length of the sub identifier of an Octet String:
Here is an example using the snmpNotifyFilter Table:
There is one row in this table having an instance of:
4.97.98.99.100.1.2.3
Which correlates to the following index:
snmpNo
On 28 July 2010 14:06, Roberto Greiner wrote:
> Based on
> http://www.mail-archive.com/net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg20966.html,
> I tried to add "dontLogTCPWrappersConnects 1" in my snmpd.conf file ...
> /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf: line 28: Warning: Unknown token:
> dontLogTCPWrappersConn
Dear sir(s),
I made a table for getting mibs information.
After my machine finished booting (the initial function was executed and was
finish),
I use "snmptable" function to get information.
The first time to get information, the
function,"encTable_get_first_data_point", is called and get my ext
Hi,
no one has an idea on this?
Based on
http://www.mail-archive.com/net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg20966.html,
I tried to add "dontLogTCPWrappersConnects 1" in my snmpd.conf file, but
the net-snmp daemon complained on restart with the following message:
Jul 28 09:56:02 server snmp
Dear sir(s),
I made a table for getting mibs information.
The structure is as following,
Table.c
/* ** table ** */
/** Initialize the table by defining its contents and how it's structured */
void
initialize_table(void)
{
static oid enc
Hi Dave,
Actually, if I am using the same handle everytime, then while calling
"connect", fd_set contains the same ID for 4 sessions and count=4 (e.g. for
4 sessions).
And the result is that: "snmp_read" doesn't return (till we receive 4
packets in this example) to call connect again.
I am assumi
On 28 July 2010 12:46, Gaurav Chaturvedi wrote:
> Actually, if I am using the same handle everytime, then while calling
> "connect", fd_set contains the same ID for 4 sessions and count=4 (e.g. for
> 4 sessions).
>
> And the result is that: "snmp_read" doesn't return (till we receive 4
> packets i
On 28 July 2010 10:54, Gaurav Chaturvedi wrote:
> I am using function:
> transport = netsnmp_tdomain_transport(port, 1, "udp")
> Here, port is same always = 162 (or anything entered by user)
>
> But, it returns valid pointer only on 1st call. After that, it always
> returns NULL,
a) What is
Hi dave,
is Net-snmp support IPv6 mib agents? if so how to do the snmpwalk for IPv6
mibs in net-snmp
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 20 July 2010 16:02, Joan Landry
> wrote:
> > I am setting a row in a table for a non-existant row - I am using
> > snmpV2c so I expect to
Hi,
As I said in my last post, i am able to get all things done correctly if I
have single session and I use single session APIs.
But for several SNMPv3 users, I need to create multiple sessions.
In this case, I am using function:
transport = netsnmp_tdomain_transport(port, 1, "udp")
Here, por
On 20 July 2010 13:43, Joan Landry wrote:
> I am getting errors in the Lexicographic ordering tests in silvercreek
> using netsnmp-5.5
>
> Does anyone know if there is a fix for these bugs in netsnmp code?
> When I walk the tables - the ordering is correct - but if you specify
> the instance on a
On 20 July 2010 16:02, Joan Landry wrote:
> I am setting a row in a table for a non-existant row - I am using
> snmpV2c so I expect to get the error noAccess - instead I am getting
> noSuchName.
>
> Can someone tell me how to fix this - as the Silvercreek test suite
> considers this an error.
Is
22 matches
Mail list logo
