Hi everybody
I am sorry but you may find this question silly BUT i have not find any
clue which affirms or disavowes it explicitly.
My question is :
Is it possible to redirect request through the daemon to another IP remote?
I am explaining myself :
a remote is receiving a snmp request but it kno
2008/5/3 k_simplydev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am sorry but you may find this question silly
No - it's not a silly question at all.
> Is it possible to redirect request through the daemon to another IP remote?
Yes.
> a remote is receiving a snmp request but it knows that the other site
> li
Thanks a lot Dave.
K.
- Message transféré
De : Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À : k_simplydev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc : net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Envoyé le : Samedi, 3 Mai 2008, 13h13mn 26s
Objet : Re: IP redirection
2008/5/3 k_simplydev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
from .22 to .21, it is the .21 which is
responding and doesnt follow the request.
What should i do to make it to work?
Regards,
K.
- Message transféré
De :
À : k_simplydev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envoyé le : Samedi, 3 Mai 2008, 13h13mn 26s
Objet : Re: IP redirection
2008/5/3 k_sim
2008/5/20 k_simplydev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have three hosts : 192.168.0.20, 192.168.0.21 and 192.168.0.22
> The both first have a snmp daemon which is running and the last only a snmp
> client.
> in the .21 host i wrote in the snmpd.conf
> proxy -v 1 -c public 192.168.0.20 .1.3
>
> but when I s
Dave Shield a écrit :
2008/5/20 k_simplydev :
I have three hosts : 192.168.0.20, 192.168.0.21 and 192.168.0.22
The both first have a snmp daemon which is running and the last only a snmp
client.
in the .21 host i wrote in the snmpd.conf
proxy -v 1 -c public 192.168.0.20 .1.3
but when I sent
2008/5/21 k_simplydev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> The first thing is to check that queries from 21 to 20 are working properly.
>>
>> What happens if you log on to the 21 system, and run
>> snmpgetnext -v 1 -c public 192.168.0.20 .1.3
> it is working i have the answer giving the OS (Linux Fedor
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of k_simplydev
> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 8:39 AM
> No when i make redirection only on this private MIB, .21 site
> respondes that is it an unknown OID.
>
> And if i do requests from .21 to 20 about private MIB, i had
> corre
2008/5/26 k_simplydev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The private MIB is a customer MIB it could be only on the .20 site cause it
> is an embedded board.
That's fine.
What I actually meant was to run a GET or GETNEXT request
*from* the 21 system directly, *to* the 20 system.
> And if i do requests from .
Hi All,
I have configured net-snmp with disman/event and notification for linkup and
down trap . My traget system is a mips-linux .While configuring I am getting
a warning message like:
configure: WARNING: Can't check sysctl, manually define
NETSNMP_CAN_USE_SYSCTL if platform support available
But
Hi Mike
Sorry to answer so late i was very busy!
Mike Ayers a écrit :
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of k_simplydev
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 8:39 AM
No when i make redirection only on this private MIB, .21 site
respondes that is it an unknown OID.
A
Dave Shield a écrit :
2008/5/26 k_simplydev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The private MIB is a customer MIB it could be only on the .20 site cause it
is an embedded board.
That's fine.
What I actually meant was to run a GET or GETNEXT request
*from* the 21 system directly, *to* the 20 system.
2008/6/17 k_simplydev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Try shutting the agent (on the 20 system) down completely.
>> Then run
>>
>> snmpd -f -Le -Dread-config
>>
>> What is the output of this command?
> The output is :
> "Cannot find the module SNMP-COMMUNITY-MIB at line 0"
Just that? Nothing else?
On a somewhat related note, is there a way to force link up/downs to
occur on Linux, to test these traps?
-Dan
2008/6/17 Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/6/17 k_simplydev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Try shutting the agent (on the 20 system) down completely.
>>> Then run
>>>
>>> snmpd -f -
> From: dan anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On a somewhat related note, is there a way to force link up/downs to
> occur on Linux, to test these traps?
If you actually have interfaces on the platform, the answer is yes.
Try something along these lines:
ip link set eth2 up
ip link set eth2
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ron Rader
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 2:39 PM
> > From: dan anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > On a somewhat related note, is there a way to force link up/downs to
> > occur on Linux, to test these traps?
>
> If yo
>Or just pull the freakin' cable!
Hard to pull a cable in vmware. ;-)
>Alternatively, use IP aliasing and mess with a network that doesn't
> have anything connected to it, like (not tested):
>
> $ ifconfig eth0:0 1172.16.1.27 netmask 255.255.255.0 # linkUp
> $ ifconfig eth0:0 d
> From: Mike Ayers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ip link set eth2 up
> > ip link set eth2 down
> Or just pull the freakin' cable!
... ass-u-ming that your platform already implements interface status
throughout the full stack, yes. And that the interface you're
attempting to generate link
Dave Shield a écrit :
2008/6/17 k_simplydev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Try shutting the agent (on the 20 system) down completely.
Then run
snmpd -f -Le -Dread-config
What is the output of this command?
The output is :
"Cannot find the module SNMP-COMMUNITY-MIB at line 0"
J
2008/6/20 k_simplydev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Try shutting the agent (on the 20 system) down completely.
>> Then run
>>
>> snmpd -f -Le -Dread-config
>>
>> What is the output of this command?
> I'm sorry I didnt take all the answer of the command
> line which is
>
> registered debug token read
[Please change the subject line when using "reply" to start a new
thread.]
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Rabindra Paikaray
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 10:31 PM
> I have configured net-snmp with disman/event and notification
> for linkup and
21 matches
Mail list logo
