Many Thanks,
Francois
2012/2/15 Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk
On 14 February 2012 15:35, Francois Bouchard francois.bouch...@mpbc.ca
wrote:
Here is the code for a cached snmp table module.
OK - I've tried compiling and running that module.
The timeout specified in the header
I'm sorry - I don't have the time to try and re-create the rest of the
code that's missing here. If you want assistance with tracking
down the problem, can you please post the *complete* code files,
so that we can try compiling them into a working module.
Here is the code for a cached snmp
According to the documentation (
http://www.net-snmp.org/dev/agent/group__cache__handler.html), a changing
the flags will change the behavior of the cache system.
After some testing of my module, it is possible to state that the agent's
data change almost instantly (when the external data
Dave,
you should be able to modify this timeout by editing the header
file and recompiling the module.
Yes this is what's been done, thexxxTable_free(...) isn't called in less
than 60 seconds, even when lowering XXX_TIMEOUT in the header file.
Perhaps you could post the code that you're
On 13 February 2012 15:46, Francois Bouchard francois.bouch...@mpbc.ca wrote:
Perhaps you could post the code that you're working with
so that we can test this
Yes, here is the code for the initialize function (generated using mib2c -c
mib2c.table_data.conf mpbcRMHAlarmTable (when asked :
is 60 seconds are minimum time for cache cleanup.
~Suresh
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:51:45 +
Subject: Re: mib2c.table_data.conf, cache timeout period does'nt seems to
change.
From: d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk
To: francois.bouch...@mpbc.ca
CC: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
On 10
oups wrong button let me finish my post,
Is there defference in the code using mib2c* -S cache=1* -c
mib2c.table_data.conf myTable * instead of* mib2c -c
mib2c.table_data.conf my myTable, *option 1)* ?
Thanks
Francois
2012/2/10 Francois Bouchard francois.bouch...@mpbc.ca
Hi,
For tables
On 10 February 2012 15:02, Francois Bouchard francois.bouch...@mpbc.ca wrote:
Is there defference in the code using mib2c -S cache=1 -c
mib2c.table_data.conf myTable instead of
mib2c -c mib2c.table_data.conf my myTable, option 1) ?
Errr... that second form looks invalid.
mib2c only takes a
Hi,
Sorry about the mistake,
I was asking for hints about the cache timeout values. It can't be modify
when changing the xxx_TIMEOUT define statement ( ie.e stays at 60 seconds )
Any hints?
Francois
But to answer your question - yes, I believe -S cache=1
*is* different to local cached
On 10 February 2012 20:06, Francois Bouchard francois.bouch...@mpbc.ca wrote:
I was asking for hints about the cache timeout values. It can't be modify
when changing the xxx_TIMEOUT define statement ( ie.e stays at 60 seconds )
H
you should be able to modify this timeout by editing
10 matches
Mail list logo
