On 12/02/07, jin zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I am afraid simply using :
snmp_send( ss1, pdu );
snmp_send( ss2, pdu );
snmp_send( ss3, pdu );
can't send a trap with content pdu to different destinations ,because the
routine snmp_send will free pdu automaticlly if succeed.
Good point.
Yes, it is a good idea of using snmp_clone_pdu to improve the efficiency
of the codes.And because the num of trap receivers is not certain, so I use
struct netsnmp_session *ss_head as a head of linked list,which is built
before sending a series of traps and free at last.It seems like that
Dear Dave,
Thank you for your suggestions.But I am afraid simply using :
snmp_send( ss1, pdu );
snmp_send( ss2, pdu );
snmp_send( ss3, pdu );
can't send a trap with content pdu to different destinations ,because the
routine snmp_send will free pdu automaticlly if succeed.I have
[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn
and offer advice. Thanks. ]
On
jin zhou wrote:
I choose using API routines snmp_pdu_create(SNMP_MSG_TRAP2) and
snmp_send(ss,pdu) to send traps,while the session peername and port can be
specified.But i meet the troulbe:it always send traps on port 161,even
through i use the codesession.remote_port= SNMP_TRAP_PORT;,while
net-snmp 5.2.3 ,working on Linux,thank you!
Thomas Anders [EMAIL PROTECTED] 写道： jin zhou wrote:
I choose using API routines snmp_pdu_create(SNMP_MSG_TRAP2) and
snmp_send(ss,pdu) to send traps,while the session peername and port can be
specified.But i meet the troulbe:it always send traps
On 08/02/07, jin zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I choose using API routines
snmp_pdu_create(SNMP_MSG_TRAP2) and snmp_send(ss,pdu)
to send traps,while the session peername and port can be specified.But i
meet the troulbe:it always send traps on port 161
Specify the destination as
Cleared~! OMG,it is so easy to you,but i can't think about it,thank you very
much!
And is the method I use the best way of resolving the problem of dynamic
trap receiver?If I meet these questiones of API using angain,how can I find out
the error quickly by myself?
Dave Shield [EMAIL
On 08/02/07, jin zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And is the method I use the best way of resolving the problem of dynamic
trap receiver?
Probably, yes.
The alternative would be to manipulate the contents of the snmpNotifyTable
and snmpTargetTable - but that would affect *all* traps sent by the
Dear Dave and all,
Hi,I am sorry to interrupt you again becuase I have another trouble.I need
to send traps to dynamic destinations which only can be determined when sending
traps on IPV4,so the trap API routines 'send_easy_trap()' or 'send_v2trap' are
not so effective because I am not
10 matches
Mail list logo
