Yes, it is a good idea of using "snmp_clone_pdu" to improve the efficiency
of the codes.And because the num of trap receivers is not certain, so I use
"struct netsnmp_session *ss_head" as a head of linked list,which is built
before sending a series of traps and free at last.It seems like that
On 12/02/07, jin zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I am afraid simply using :
> snmp_send( ss1, pdu );
> snmp_send( ss2, pdu );
> snmp_send( ss3, pdu );
>
> can't send a trap with content pdu to different destinations ,because the
> routine snmp_send will free pdu automaticlly if succeed.
Goo
Dear Dave,
Thank you for your suggestions.But I am afraid simply using :
snmp_send( ss1, pdu );
snmp_send( ss2, pdu );
snmp_send( ss3, pdu );
can't send a trap with content pdu to different destinations ,because the
routine snmp_send will free pdu automaticlly if succeed.I have thou
[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn
and offer advice. Thanks. ]
On 08/02
On 08/02/07, jin zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And is the method I use the best way of resolving the problem of dynamic
> trap receiver?
Probably, yes.
The alternative would be to manipulate the contents of the snmpNotifyTable
and snmpTargetTable - but that would affect *all* traps sent by t
Cleared~! OMG,it is so easy to you,but i can't think about it,thank you very
much!
And is the method I use the best way of resolving the problem of dynamic
trap receiver?If I meet these questiones of API using angain,how can I find out
the error quickly by myself?
Dave Shield <[EMAIL PRO
On 08/02/07, jin zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I choose using API routines
> "snmp_pdu_create(SNMP_MSG_TRAP2)" and "snmp_send(ss,pdu)"
> to send traps,while the session peername and port can be specified.But i
> meet the troulbe:it always send traps on port 161
Specify the destination as "
net-snmp 5.2.3 ,working on Linux,thank you!
Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 写道： jin zhou wrote:
> I choose using API routines "snmp_pdu_create(SNMP_MSG_TRAP2)" and
> "snmp_send(ss,pdu)" to send traps,while the session peername and port can be
> specified.But i meet the troulbe:it always send
jin zhou wrote:
> I choose using API routines "snmp_pdu_create(SNMP_MSG_TRAP2)" and
> "snmp_send(ss,pdu)" to send traps,while the session peername and port can be
> specified.But i meet the troulbe:it always send traps on port 161,even
> through i use the code"session.remote_port= SNMP_TRAP_PORT
Dear Dave and all,
Hi,I am sorry to interrupt you again becuase I have another trouble.I need
to send traps to dynamic destinations which only can be determined when sending
traps on IPV4,so the trap API routines 'send_easy_trap()' or 'send_v2trap' are
not so effective because I am not a
10 matches
Mail list logo
