]
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:02:48 -0400
Subject: Re: array-user snmpbulkwalk worked for a table not entire mib
On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:22:09 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:JC> I have run into an issue when running snmpbulkwalk on my MIBJC&g
On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:22:09 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JC> I have run into an issue when running snmpbulkwalk on my MIB
JC> implemented using array-user in 5.2.1.
Sorry for the delay. Can you send me:
1) your MY-MIB.txt file
2) output of snmpbulkwalk -On -v 2c -c public myhost
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 15:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 63 =>./snmpgetnext -v 2c -c P-public localhost MY-MIB::rCount.0
> MY-MIB::rCount.0 = INTEGER: 0
That's wrong for a start.
This should be returning 'MY-MIB::boardId.0
> 65 =>./snmpbulkget -Cr1 -v 2c -c P-public localhost MY-MIB::rCount.0
> MY
bles, with about 10 tables).
- John
--- On Fri 06/03, Dave Shield < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
From: Dave Shield [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 09:36:10 +0100
Subject: Re: array-user snmpbulk
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 15:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If I put the non-repeater value to anything 1 and higher it works
> fine.
If you're running 'snmpbulkwalk', then presumably you're only
supplying a single OID to work with?
In which case, setting a non-repeater value of 1 (or more),
means th
ECTED]
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 09:04:35 +0100
Subject: Re: array-user snmpbulkwalk worked for a table not entire mib
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 19:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:>Could you possibly explain why an snmpbulkwalk command> would work on
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 19:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Could you possibly explain why an snmpbulkwalk command
> would work on my MIB when the non-repeater value is set to 1
> and fail when not set at all?
Not really, no.
I thought Robert was looking into that?
I was just commenting on the hig
26, Dave Shield < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
From: Dave Shield [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 16:11:47 +0100
Subject: Re: array-user snmpbulkwalk worked for a table not entire mib
On Thu, 2005-0
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 15:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> does setting the
> non-repeater value to 1 have a similar functional effect to the a
> command as the max-repetitions?
No - the two fields have completely different purposes.
A single GetBulk
-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 10:34:21 +0100
Subject: Re: array-user snmpbulkwalk worked for a table not entire mib
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 19:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:> Also, changing the max-repeater to 1. Is changing these values> to make a bulkwalk work an accepta
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 19:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Also, changing the max-repeater to 1. Is changing these values
> to make a bulkwalk work an acceptable practice?
Changing the max-repetitions of a GetBulk to 1 is singularly
pointless. You might as well use GetNext in the first place.
Da
--- On Mon 05/23, Robert Story < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
From: Robert Story [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 16:27:50 -0400
Subject: Re: array-user snmpbulkwalk worked for a table not entire mib
On Mo
On Mon, 23 May 2005 18:41:03 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JC> Thanks for the response. The code was generated with
JC> mib2c.array-user.conf,v 5.24 which does appear in the 5.2.1 rc2 I
JC> downloaded in January. I usually dynamically load the mib, but have
JC> recently compiled it into th
Thanks for the response. The code was generated with mib2c.array-user.conf,v
5.24 which does appear in the 5.2.1 rc2 I downloaded in January. I usually
dynamically load the mib, but have recently compiled it into the agent and it
appears to function in the same manner.
- John
--- On Mo
On Mon, 23 May 2005 15:49:27 -0400 Robert wrote:
RS> On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:22:09 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RS> JC> I have run into an issue when running snmpbulkwalk on my MIB
RS> JC> implemented using array-user in 5.2.1.
RS>
RS> Was the array-user code generated with
On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:22:09 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JC> I have run into an issue when running snmpbulkwalk on my MIB
JC> implemented using array-user in 5.2.1. I can successfully bulkwalk the
JC> information in a single table in the MIB, however, when bulkwalking the
JC>
I have run into an issue when running snmpbulkwalk on my MIB
implemented using array-user in 5.2.1. I can successfully bulkwalk the
information in a single table in the MIB, however, when bulkwalking the entire
MIB I receive:
snmpbulkwalk -v 2c -c public myhost MY-MIB::myObjects
17 matches
Mail list logo
