> The one with only asym. support is a big Cisco Catalyst 3350 (well.. big
> but not that many ports :-)
Ok, I got in the config of the switch with somebody who knows how to
speak ciscong, and it seems that it defaults to flow control "desired"
for send and "off" for receive on all ports, which me
> ..same problem with 2.6.20-rc3. Last worked with
> 2.6.19-rc6-git12, so it was 2.6.19 where it failed.
> Attaching both case1 normal, case2 acpi=noirq. With acpi=noirq ethernet
> doesn't get configured, route -n says it's an Unsupported operation,
> ifconfig only shows for localhost, ifconf
subscribe netdev
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 21:26 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:20:14 +1100
>
> > Now, I cross-over with a TG3 and I get:
> >
> > - I advertise 0x5e1 (hopefully same value)
> > - I read in LPA 0xc5e1 from the TG3
> > (and tha
This patch adds support for a few more PHYs used by Apple and fixes
advertising and detecting of Pause (we were missing setting the bit in
MII_ADVERTISE and weren't testing in LPA for all PHYs).
Note that I currently only advertise pause, not asymetric pause. I don't
know for sure the details ther
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:20:14 +1100
> Now, I cross-over with a TG3 and I get:
>
> - I advertise 0x5e1 (hopefully same value)
> - I read in LPA 0xc5e1 from the TG3
> (and that other register tells me Rx and Tx pause can be enabled).
Does flow c
> Thanks for finding these bugs, although that's really strange pause
> behavior you are seeing on your switches.
>
> By default, we advertise PAUSE but not ASYM PAUSE in the tg3 driver,
> and I get flow control on every switch I have here.
Yeah, that's strange. I still have the debug values at
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:58:05 +1100
> This patch adds support for a few more PHYs used by Apple and fixes
> advertising and detecting of Pause (we were missing setting the bit in
> MII_ADVERTISE and weren't testing in LPA for all PHYs). I only do
This patch adds support for a few more PHYs used by Apple and fixes
advertising and detecting of Pause (we were missing setting the bit in
MII_ADVERTISE and weren't testing in LPA for all PHYs). I only do it for
gigabit capable PHYs for now.
Note that I currently only advertise pause, not asymetri
The following changes since commit fe5f8e2a1c5c040209c598a28e19c55f30e1040d:
Zhu Yi (1):
ipw2100: Fix dropping fragmented small packet problem
are found in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-2.6.git
upstream
Daniel Drake (5):
The following changes since commit 669df1b478803f49a356528d290af7bf442eb3be:
Linus Torvalds (1):
Linux 2.6.20-rc3
are found in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-2.6.git
upstream-fixes
Zhu Yi (2):
ieee80211: WLAN_GET_SEQ_SEQ
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 07:10:57PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 04:39:38PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > John W. Linville wrote:
> > >The following changes since commit
> > >0c234ae655a45ac3ee53a25b2e56e9bb6c27d71d:
> > > Ulrich Kunitz (1):
> > >ieee80211softma
02.01.2007 22:57, Adrian Bunk wrote/a écrit:
This patch contains the scheduled removal of the eepro100 driver.
Hi, I've been using e100 for years with no problem, however more by
curiosity than necessity I'd like to know how will be handled the
devices which are (supposedly) supported by eepr
David Stevens wrote:
I've looked at this a little too -- it'd be nice to know who holds
the write lock.
I see ip_mc_destroy_dev() is bouncing through the lock for
each multicast address, though it starts at the beginning of
the list each time. I don't see a problem with it, but it'd be
simpler i
From: Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:25:24 -0500
> I'm sorry I just saw this mail (mail not sent directly to me get
> shuffled off to a folder). I agree with your patch, I think
> dropping and then re-taking the RCU lock is the best way to go,
> although I'm curious to se
From: "Daniel_Marjamäki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 10:16:02 +0100
> I have done a little testing on my own. My results is that memcpy is
> many times faster even with aligned data.
Your test program doesn't make any measurements, from where did
you get these "results"?
Also, your
I've looked at this a little too -- it'd be nice to know who holds
the write lock.
I see ip_mc_destroy_dev() is bouncing through the lock for
each multicast address, though it starts at the beginning of
the list each time. I don't see a problem with it, but it'd be
simpler if it acquired the write
From: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:47:37 +0100
> Hello,
>
> This patch removes redundant argument check for module_put().
>
> Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:39:06 +0100
> All ->doit handlers want a struct rtattr **, so pass down the right
> type.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This code was just trying to mirror the typing used by
struct rtnetlink_link'
From: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 11:49:42 +0100
> Hello David,
>
> > One could argue from a defensive programming perspective that
> > this bug comes from the fact that the ifb_init_one() loop
> > advances state before checking for errors ('i' is advanced before
> > > IMHO, it is bad security policy to allow wake on lan to enabled by
> > > default. The sky2 driver doesn't do WOL until enabled with ethtool.
> >
> > While in general I agree with you on the security principle, this seems
> > like it might break working setups.
> >
> > WOL is a partnership bet
On Tuesday, January 2 2007 2:58 am, Adam J. Richter wrote:
> I have not yet performed the 21 steps of
> linux-2.6.20-rc3/Documentation/SubmitChecklist, which I think is a
> great objectives list for future automation or some kind of community
> web site. I hope to find time to make progress
On Sunday, December 24 2006 7:25 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 05:21:24 +0800
>
> "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Under 2.6.20-rc1 and 2.6.20-rc2, I get the following complaint
> > for several network programs running on my system:
> >
> > [ 156.381868] BUG: s
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:45:57 +0100
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:39:53AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > I don't like it, even if it's "correct", because it is inconsistent
> > with what we do in the entire rest of the networking code.
>
> Good point.
>
> Is
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's a glaring bug in selinux_netlbl_inode_permission() - taking
> lock_sock() inside rcu_read_lock().
Note that the bug is still in -rc3, and is easily triggerable via a
default FC6 bootup. It's fixed by the (slightly modified) patch from
Parag
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc3 compared to 2.6.19
with patches available
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any othe
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc3 compared to 2.6.19
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:36:44 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 16:44:24 -0500
> Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > Patches are in order of severity. 1-3 are bug fixes, 4 is a cleanup
> > > of the power state code, and 5 adds wake on
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 16:44:24 -0500
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Patches are in order of severity. 1-3 are bug fixes, 4 is a cleanup
> > of the power state code, and 5 adds wake on lan support.
> >
> > IMHO, it is bad security policy to allow wake on lan to
With NAPI, if i have a few interupts it likely implies i have a huge
network load (and therefore CPU use) and would be much more happier if
you didnt start moving more interupt load to that already loaded CPU
current irqbalance accounts for napi by using the number of packets as
indicator f
The best way to achieve such balancing is to have the network card help
and essentially be able to select the CPU to notify while at the same
time considering:
a) avoiding any packet reordering - which restricts a flow to be
processed to a single CPU at least within a timeframe
b) be per-CPU-load-
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 10:41, Sid Boyce wrote:
> Same problem with 2.6.19-rc3.
Do you mean 2.6.20-rc3 still does not work?
What was the last kernel that worked properly with no cmdline parameters?
> Apologies for the long spiel, if memory serves me correct, gzip'd
> attachments are verboten.
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 04:30:41PM +0100, Ivo Van Doorn wrote:
> +static inline void __bss_tim_set(struct ieee80211_local *local,
> + struct ieee80211_if_ap *bss, int aid)
> +{
> + bss->tim[(aid)/8] |= 1<<((aid) % 8);
> +}
This really screams to be converted to __s
Same problem with 2.6.19-rc3.
Apologies for the long spiel, if memory serves me correct, gzip'd
attachments are verboten.
openSUSE 10.2
Network does not get configured with "acpi=noirq" or "acpi=off".
There may be something in dmesg that allows further analysis of the
problem.
00:0a:e4:4e:a1:4
On 1/1/07, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Switching the interface mode with some encryption keys set and then later
touching any key, triggers an oops because ieee80211_if_reinit fails to
NULL'ify the related pointers after free'ing the key on mode change. Long
explanation, simple fix belo
On 1/1/07, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hacking a bit on rt2x00 to make it work in master and ad-hoc mode, lockdep
popped up on some hostapd ioctls, pointing out remaining inconsistencies
related to sta_lock:
1. sta_lock holders must always be protected against softirq
2. bss_tim_set/cl
All ->doit handlers want a struct rtattr **, so pass down the right
type.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
===
--- linux-2.6.orig/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c 2006-12-12 11:30:55.000
Hi,
can someone explain how TX flow control in d80211 is supposed to work? I
failed to understand the full design so far.
What I (think to) understand is that a low-level drivers call
ieee80211_stop_queue() if they run out of buffers. That flips a
per-queue bit (IEEE80211_LINK_STATE_XOFF), preven
Hello,
This patch removes redundant argument check for module_put().
Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
net/netlink/af_netlink.c |3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -upr linux-2.6.20-rc2-mm1-a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
linux-2.6.20-rc2-mm1-
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:39:53AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 04:46:26 +0100
>
> > This patch adds proper prototypes for some functions in
> > include/net/irda/irda.h
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ...
> >
Hello David,
> One could argue from a defensive programming perspective that
> this bug comes from the fact that the ifb_init_one() loop
> advances state before checking for errors ('i' is advanced before
> the 'err' check due to the loop construct), and that's why the
> error recovery code had t
On 02-01-2007 08:51, David Miller wrote:
> From: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 00:55:51 +0100
>
>> On error we should start freeing resources at [i-1] not [i-2].
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Patch applied, thanks Mariusz.
>
>> dif
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 09:23:02AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 08:39:09AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> ...
> > The main thing is the possibility of processing
> > skb with not entirely open source dev which isn't
> > expected (and checked) by receive functions.
> > I
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 04:25:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 05:21:24 +0800
> "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Under 2.6.20-rc1 and 2.6.20-rc2, I get the following complaint
>> for several network programs running on my system:
>>
>> [ 156.381868] BU
From: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:57:33 +0300
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied, thanks Alexey.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at ht
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 04:46:26 +0100
> This patch adds proper prototypes for some functions in
> include/net/irda/irda.h
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...
> +struct net_device;
> +struct packet_type;
> +
> +void irda_proc_register(void)
From: Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:11:11 +0900
> I guess that this code used to be more complex, but replacing
> the goto with a while seems to make things a bit more readable.
> Or in other words, two fairly gratuitous goto are removed.
>
> On a related note, I wonder if t
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 08:39:09AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
> It is hard to say what kind of bug to expect
> because at the same time other net_rx_action
> with the same vlan dev could take place on
> other processor and this inetdev_init could
> do more.
Sorry! inetdev_init couldn't do m
48 matches
Mail list logo
