Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-12-21 at 14:25 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > Martin Bjorklund writes:
> > >
> > > > Hi Andy,
> > > >
> > > > Andy Bierman wrote:
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
>
On Thu, 2017-12-21 at 14:25 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > Martin Bjorklund writes:
> >
> > > Hi Andy,
> > >
> > > Andy Bierman wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I have reviewed draft-07 and my previous comments
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Martin Bjorklund writes:
>
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > Andy Bierman wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have reviewed draft-07 and my previous comments about NMDA have been
> >> addressed.
> >>
> >> This might be the most
On 12/20/2017 07:06 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 06:25:04AM -0500, Lou Berger wrote:
>>
>> If the text above is accurate, I think something along its lined along its
>> lined should be added. If not accurate, then I think you have a new point
>> to clarify...
>>
>
>
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 06:25:04AM -0500, Lou Berger wrote:
>
> If the text above is accurate, I think something along its lined along its
> lined should be added. If not accurate, then I think you have a new point
> to clarify...
>
Saying that '[re]boot' includes full and partial [re]boots
On December 19, 2017 3:31:34 PM Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Hi Lou,
Lou Berger wrote:
Hi,
...
3) A minor point, the document uses the terms boot and reboot. I
suspect that these terms are intended to cover any full or partial,
e.g., protocol, restart
On 19/12/2017 20:54, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:41:28PM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Hi Lou,
Lou Berger wrote:
Hi,
These comments are based on my Shepherd
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:41:28PM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> > Hi Lou,
> >
> > Lou Berger wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > These comments are based on my Shepherd review of this document and
> > >
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Hi Lou,
>
> Lou Berger wrote:
> > Hi,
> > These comments are based on my Shepherd review of this document and
> > should be addressed as part of addressing any LC comments:
> >
> > 1)
Hi Lou,
Lou Berger wrote:
> Hi,
> These comments are based on my Shepherd review of this document and
> should be addressed as part of addressing any LC comments:
>
> 1) Considering the recent discussion on Library made me consider the
> general case of a module that is
Hi Andy,
Andy Bierman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have reviewed draft-07 and my previous comments about NMDA have been
> addressed.
>
> This might be the most important sentence in the draft:
>
> sec. 5.3
>
>The datastore schema for MUST be a superset of the
>combined
All,
This LC is closed.
Authors,
Please address any/all comments received during the LC. Once you've
published the version that you believe addresses all comments/pending
changes, please summarize the changes on the list and let us all know
that you believe that the version is ready to
Hi,
These comments are based on my Shepherd review of this document and
should be addressed as part of addressing any LC comments:
1) Considering the recent discussion on Library made me consider the
general case of a module that is composed entirely of operational state.
I think this
Hi,
I have reviewed draft-07 and my previous comments about NMDA have been
addressed.
This might be the most important sentence in the draft:
sec. 5.3
The datastore schema for MUST be a superset of the
combined datastore schema used in all configuration datastores except
that YANG
All,
This starts a second working group last call on
draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores.
As this is a 2nd LC that is focused on changes since the last LC, it closes in
*one* week. The working group last call ends on December 11. Please send your
comments to the netmod mailing list.
At this
15 matches
Mail list logo