Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07

2017-12-21 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > On Thu, 2017-12-21 at 14:25 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > Martin Bjorklund writes: > > > > > > > Hi Andy, > > > > > > > > Andy Bierman wrote: > > > >> Hi, > > > >> >

Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07

2017-12-21 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
On Thu, 2017-12-21 at 14:25 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > Martin Bjorklund writes: > > > > > Hi Andy, > > > > > > Andy Bierman wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I have reviewed draft-07 and my previous comments

Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07

2017-12-21 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Martin Bjorklund writes: > > > Hi Andy, > > > > Andy Bierman wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have reviewed draft-07 and my previous comments about NMDA have been > >> addressed. > >> > >> This might be the most

Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07

2017-12-20 Thread Lou Berger
On 12/20/2017 07:06 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 06:25:04AM -0500, Lou Berger wrote: >> >> If the text above is accurate, I think something along its lined along its >> lined should be added. If not accurate, then I think you have a new point >> to clarify... >> > >

Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07

2017-12-20 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 06:25:04AM -0500, Lou Berger wrote: > > If the text above is accurate, I think something along its lined along its > lined should be added. If not accurate, then I think you have a new point > to clarify... > Saying that '[re]boot' includes full and partial [re]boots

Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07

2017-12-20 Thread Lou Berger
On December 19, 2017 3:31:34 PM Martin Bjorklund wrote: Hi Lou, Lou Berger wrote: Hi, ... 3) A minor point, the document uses the terms boot and reboot. I suspect that these terms are intended to cover any full or partial, e.g., protocol, restart

Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07

2017-12-20 Thread Robert Wilton
On 19/12/2017 20:54, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:41:28PM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote: On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Hi Lou, Lou Berger wrote: Hi, These comments are based on my Shepherd

Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07

2017-12-19 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:41:28PM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > Hi Lou, > > > > Lou Berger wrote: > > > Hi, > > > These comments are based on my Shepherd review of this document and > > >

Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07

2017-12-19 Thread Andy Bierman
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Hi Lou, > > Lou Berger wrote: > > Hi, > > These comments are based on my Shepherd review of this document and > > should be addressed as part of addressing any LC comments: > > > > 1)

Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07

2017-12-19 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Hi Lou, Lou Berger wrote: > Hi, > These comments are based on my Shepherd review of this document and > should be addressed as part of addressing any LC comments: > > 1) Considering the recent discussion on Library made me consider the > general case of a module that is

Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07

2017-12-19 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Hi Andy, Andy Bierman wrote: > Hi, > > I have reviewed draft-07 and my previous comments about NMDA have been > addressed. > > This might be the most important sentence in the draft: > > sec. 5.3 > >The datastore schema for MUST be a superset of the >combined

Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07

2017-12-12 Thread Lou Berger
All, This LC is closed. Authors, Please address any/all comments received during the LC. Once you've published the version that you believe addresses all comments/pending changes, please summarize the changes on the list and let us all know that you believe that the version is ready to

Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07

2017-12-12 Thread Lou Berger
Hi, These comments are based on my Shepherd review of this document and should be addressed as part of addressing any LC comments: 1) Considering the recent discussion on Library made me consider the general case of a module that is composed entirely of operational state. I think this

Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07

2017-12-08 Thread Andy Bierman
Hi, I have reviewed draft-07 and my previous comments about NMDA have been addressed. This might be the most important sentence in the draft: sec. 5.3 The datastore schema for MUST be a superset of the combined datastore schema used in all configuration datastores except that YANG

[netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07

2017-12-04 Thread Lou Berger
All, This starts a second working group last call on draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores. As this is a 2nd LC that is focused on changes since the last LC, it closes in *one* week. The working group last call ends on December 11. Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list. At this