In message
on 7 May 2015 Andrew Pinder wrote:
> I wonder how stable the measurements are. I've just upgraded this
> ARMini to RO 5.22 so have redone the measurements, still with NS#2771:
> 161126 bytes/second. That's a massive increase. I had visited a
> number of websites for that.
> Tryin
In article <0c9680c054.andrew-...@waitrose.com>,
Andrew Pinder wrote:
> I'm curious that there is so much variability!
Will some of this not be due to the fact that stuff is already in the
cache and won't be saved again?
--
Chris Johnson
In article <0c9680c054.andrew-...@waitrose.com>,
[snip]
> More measurements:
> Various sites including BBC election coverage: 212787 bytes/second
> Relaunch, load home page only and quit: 0 bytes/second ???
> Same again, but force a refresh and then quit: 31146 bytes/second
> Same again, but afte
Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
--
Richard Torrens.
http://www.Torrens.org.uk for genealogy, natural history, wild food, walks, cats
and more!
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:26:32PM +0100, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
>
> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
>
It has been reported in the tracker as bug number 2314. Google have
changed the non javascript portion of their reply (the noscript
In article <54c08c6513li...@torrens.org.uk>,
Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
It still works if you put JS on - but, of course, that bu**ers up StreetMap.
Now more than ever we need that magic JS ON/JS OFF
On 8 May 2015 Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
I think it's absolutely essential that we have a javascript on/off
button on the toolbar. If javescript is off google won't work and if
it's on streetmap.co.uk w
In article <54c08c6513li...@torrens.org.uk>, Richard Torrens (lists)
wrote:
> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
If you mean Google Search, in its stead I've been using DuckDuckGo with
RISC OS for some time.
https://duckduckgo.com/html/
--
w
In article <20150508125407.ga2...@kyllikki.org>,
Vincent Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:26:32PM +0100, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> > Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
> >
> > Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
> >
[Snip]
> We cannot do anything about this in
In article <54c08ebfb1joh...@ukgateway.net>,
John Williams wrote:
> Or one of those "record your button presses and menu items" programs we
> used to have in the olden days.
It's called KeyStroke, Alisdair Jørgensen, originally sold by Quantum
software, now PD. It could indeed record such a t
In article <20150508125407.ga2...@kyllikki.org>,
Vincent Sanders wrote:
> It has been reported in the tracker as bug number 2314. Google have
> changed the non javascript portion of their reply (the noscript entry)
> to comtain completely broken html that simply causes the browser to
> refresh
In message <20150508125407.ga2...@kyllikki.org>
on 8 May 2015 Vincent Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:26:32PM +0100, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
>> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
>>
>> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
>>
> It has been reported in the tracker
In message <54c085ed15ch...@chris-johnson.org.uk>
on 8 May 2015 cj wrote:
> In article <0c9680c054.andrew-...@waitrose.com>,
>Andrew Pinder wrote:
>> I'm curious that there is so much variability!
> Will some of this not be due to the fact that stuff is already in the
> cache and won't be
On 8 May 2015, Andrew Pinder wrote:
[snip]
> Which version of NetSurf are we talking about here? I'm on 3.4 (Dev
> CI #2771) on RO 5.22 and haven't seen any problems with Google.
Try tuning off JavaScript.
Tony
OK perhaps I needed to be more explicit in what I wanted to achieve
from this testing.
I am interested in the persistent disc cache write performance on
different platforms, especially RISC OS, to see if my recent changes
improve the situation there..
This means the browser must be used to retrie
In message
on 8 May 2015 Tony Moore wrote:
> On 8 May 2015, Andrew Pinder wrote:
> [snip]
>> Which version of NetSurf are we talking about here? I'm on 3.4 (Dev
>> CI #2771) on RO 5.22 and haven't seen any problems with Google.
> Try tuning off JavaScript.
Sorry, I wasnt paying enough att
In message
Tony Moore wrote:
> On 8 May 2015, Andrew Pinder wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> Which version of NetSurf are we talking about here? I'm on 3.4 (Dev
>> CI #2771) on RO 5.22 and haven't seen any problems with Google.
>
> Try tuning off JavaScript.
>
> Tony
With JS off, accessin
On 8 May 2015, george greenfield
wrote:
[snip]
> So a temporary workaround might be to enable JS, hotlist all
> regularly-visited/needed sites, then disable JS and avoid using the
> search page entirely.
How is it possible to transfer an address, from the Google search page,
to the NetSurf hotl
In message <3d8ea4c054.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>
Tony Moore wrote:
> On 8 May 2015, george greenfield
> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> So a temporary workaround might be to enable JS, hotlist all
>> regularly-visited/needed sites, then disable JS and avoid using the
>> search page
In article <54c08f864b...@timil.com>,
Tim Hill wrote:
> In article <54c08c6513li...@torrens.org.uk>, Richard Torrens (lists)
> wrote:
> > Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
> > Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
> If you mean Google Search, in its stead I've been using DuckDuck
Another way of using Google is, for example
http://www.google.co.uk/search?&q=Acacia
Just double click on the link. Works from Pluto, StronEd and anything else
which will launch a URL.
Once on the search, you can delete the search term and type in another.
So it seems to be only from the first p
On 8 May 2015, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> Another way of using Google is, for example
> http://www.google.co.uk/search?&q=Acacia
> Just double click on the link. Works from Pluto, StronEd and anything else
> which will launch a URL.
But that doesn't work on Netsurf :-(
It just oscillates t
On 8 May 2015 Frank de Bruijn wrote:
> In article <54c08f864b...@timil.com>,
>Tim Hill wrote:
>> In article <54c08c6513li...@torrens.org.uk>, Richard Torrens (lists)
>> wrote:
>>> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
>>> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
>> If you mean Google
On 8 May, li...@torrens.org.uk typed:
> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
One suggestion would be to use https://startpage.com instead.
It claims to:
- be the world's most private search engine,
- use Google in the background on your behalf any
In article <9118c3c054.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>,
Richard Porter wrote:
[Snip]
> I use Google to provide a search facility on my own web site. Which of
> any of the other search engines or front ends allow you to create a
> form which specifies a particular site?
https://duckduckgo.com/s
On 8 May 2015 Bernard Boase wrote:
> On 8 May, li...@torrens.org.uk typed:
>> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
>> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
> One suggestion would be to use https://startpage.com instead.
> It claims to:
> - be the world's most private search engine,
>
On 8 May 2015 as I do recall,
Vincent Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:26:32PM +0100, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> > Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
> >
> > Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
> >
>
> It has been reported in the tracker as bug number 2314.
On 8 May 2015, Frank de Bruijn wrote:
> In article <54c08f864b...@timil.com>,
>Tim Hill wrote:
>> In article <54c08c6513li...@torrens.org.uk>, Richard Torrens (lists)
>> wrote:
>>> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
>>> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
>> If you mean Google
28 matches
Mail list logo
