Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-24 Thread David H Wild
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another bonus if using StrongED doing it that way is that StrongED has a spell checker. Not sure if Edit does. No, it doesn't, but I find spell checkers more trouble than they're worth. I don't think that spelling

Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-13 Thread Paul Vigay
I know what would be good When you click 'back' on NetSurf, it could keep any data entered into forms. There are numerous times when I complete a lengthy form and click submit, only to find that I've mistyped the captcha or some other error has occurred, and the site solution is to click back

Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-13 Thread Kevin Wells
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Richard Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 13 May 2008 Paul Vigay wrote: I know what would be good When you click 'back' on NetSurf, it could keep any data entered into forms. There are numerous times when I complete a lengthy form and click

Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-13 Thread David J. Ruck
Richard Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 13 May 2008 Kevin Wells wrote: Another bonus if using StrongED doing it that way is that StrongED has a spell checker. Not sure if Edit does. No, it doesn't, but I find spell checkers more trouble than they're worth. I find them invaluable

Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-13 Thread Tim Hill
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Snip] Btw, it's a criterion - spell checkers don't spot grammatical and semantic errors. I hope one day someone will come along with a pedantry checker. ;-) -- Tim Hill, www.timil.com

OT (was: Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf)

2008-05-13 Thread Tim Hill
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 13 May 2008 Tim Hill wrote: Btw, it's a criterion - spell checkers don't spot grammatical and semantic errors. I hope one day someone will come along with a pedantry checker. ;-) I knew someone would say that!

Re: Even more OT (was: Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf)

2008-05-13 Thread Dr Peter Young
On 13 May 2008 Tim Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 13 May 2008 Tim Hill wrote: Btw, it's a criterion - spell checkers don't spot grammatical and semantic errors. I hope one day someone will come along with a pedantry

Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-13 Thread John-Mark Bell
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Paul Vigay wrote: I know what would be good When you click 'back' on NetSurf, it could keep any data entered into forms. There are numerous times when I complete a lengthy form and click submit, only to find that I've mistyped the captcha or some other error has

Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-13 Thread Richard Porter
On 13 May 2008 John-Mark Bell wrote: On Tue, 13 May 2008, Paul Vigay wrote: I know what would be good When you click 'back' on NetSurf, it could keep any data entered into forms. ... Increase the memory cache size to enhance the chances of clicking back retaining the form data. I

Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-13 Thread John-Mark Bell
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Richard Porter wrote: On 13 May 2008 John-Mark Bell wrote: On Tue, 13 May 2008, Paul Vigay wrote: The only (occasional) way around this is to adjust click on the submit button to submit into a new window, but sometimes this doesn't work. There shouldn't be any