Curtis,
Thanks, I tinkered with Evolution and it looks really promising. A few years
ago I dumped Outaluck Express in search of a non-Microsoft email client.
Although I've been using StarOffice, there's always room for improvement
(especially with speed). It appears that Evolution may be th
I've got to add that I've been using Evolution and it does have that
option (adding TO: to the Inbox view). My ISP provides 3 email
addresses and the To: option actually inspired me to add an email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) to be used strictly for newsgroups. It works
pretty good.
/curtis ><>
On W
On Wednesday 24 October 2001 07:23am, you wrote:
> on 10/24/01 5:03 AM, Sevatio at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm just curious if any of you consider a "TO:" column as being important
> > for email clients. Why won't some of the email readers (like Kmail &
> > Netscape/Mozilla) include this imp
On Wednesday 24 October 2001 09:29 am, you wrote:
> on 10/24/01 10:55 AM, michael at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Please excuse my inclusion of a .png attachment, but
> > when I read that Kmail was unable to filter based on
> > To: field contents, I just had to show why I disagree
> > (or maybe I
on 10/24/01 5:03 AM, Sevatio at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm just curious if any of you consider a "TO:" column as being important
> for email clients. Why won't some of the email readers (like Kmail &
> Netscape/Mozilla) include this important "TO:" column? It would allow me
> to quickly spo
I would just like to have a "TO:" column. Yes there is a "TO:" field but
it's nice to see it in a column next to Subject, Sender, Date where you can
quickly pan up and down. And yes I could use the filter option to split up
the emails according to its "TO:" field. But when you have well over
In fact, both Kmail and Netscape does have a "TO:" field to use to
filter. Maybe you didn't really look that closely, because you
*believed* that it didn't.
But I dun get you when you say there's no "TO:" field. I can see the
"TO:" field for all my emails. Do you mean when it's listing the ema
;>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 10/24/01, 3:48:27 AM, Sevatio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re:
[newbie] "TO:" Column In Email Readers:
> Good idea but you
iginal Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 10/24/01, 3:33:50 AM, skinky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re:
[newbie] "TO:" Column In Email Readers:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 23:03, Sevatio wrote:
> | I'm just curious if any of
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 23:03, Sevatio wrote:
| I'm just curious if any of you consider a "TO:" column as being
| important for email clients. Why won't some of the email readers (like
| Kmail & Netscape/Mozilla) include this important "TO:" column? It would
| allow me to quickly spot if its junk m
I'm just curious if any of you consider a "TO:" column as being important
for email clients. Why won't some of the email readers (like Kmail &
Netscape/Mozilla) include this important "TO:" column? It would allow me
to quickly spot if its junk mail or just know who it's addressed to. I
curr
11 matches
Mail list logo
