Re: [newbie] 10.0 slower than 9.2?

2004-05-21 Thread Raffaele BELARDI
JoeHill wrote: It seems to be sending three copies of your mail to the list, too! Maybe that's what's slowing your system down... ;-) :-) raf Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club

Re: [newbie] 10.0 slower than 9.2?

2004-05-20 Thread Raffaele BELARDI
Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote: I never used Mdk 9, but I can tell you I was impressed with the speed of 10.0, both CE and Official. I revived an ancient (~6 years old) NT machine, Pentium II 400MHz, graphics card so old it's no longer supported by the vendor. I was surprised how responsive it is on

Re: [newbie] 10.0 slower than 9.2?

2004-05-20 Thread Raffaele BELARDI
Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote: I never used Mdk 9, but I can tell you I was impressed with the speed of 10.0, both CE and Official. I revived an ancient (~6 years old) NT machine, Pentium II 400MHz, graphics card so old it's no longer supported by the vendor. I was surprised how responsive it is on

Re: [newbie] 10.0 slower than 9.2?

2004-05-20 Thread Raffaele BELARDI
Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote: I never used Mdk 9, but I can tell you I was impressed with the speed of 10.0, both CE and Official. I revived an ancient (~6 years old) NT machine, Pentium II 400MHz, graphics card so old it's no longer supported by the vendor. I was surprised how responsive it is on

Re: [newbie] 10.0 slower than 9.2?

2004-05-20 Thread JoeHill
On Thu, 20 May 2004 11:15:30 +0200 Raffaele BELARDI disseminated the following: I never used Mdk 9, but I can tell you I was impressed with the speed of 10.0, both CE and Official. I revived an ancient (~6 years old) NT machine, Pentium II 400MHz, graphics card so old it's no longer

Re: [newbie] 10.0 slower than 9.2?

2004-05-19 Thread Raffaele BELARDI
John Drouhard wrote: On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 09:55 +0200, Raffaele BELARDI wrote: Simple test: same movies that in 9.2 played fine and smooth in 10.0 skip LOTS of frames What video card do you have? If it's an nvidia card, you might need to Nope, it's an ATI Radeon 7xxx (don't remember exact

RE: [newbie] 10.0 slower than 9.2?

2004-05-19 Thread Tony S. Sykes
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Raffaele BELARDI Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 10:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] 10.0 slower than 9.2? John Drouhard wrote: On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 09:55 +0200, Raffaele BELARDI wrote: Simple test: same movies

Re: [newbie] 10.0 slower than 9.2?

2004-05-19 Thread Ron Hunter-Duvar
On May 14, 2004 01:55, Raffaele BELARDI wrote: ... I remember somebody defining 10.0 speed daemon so I was quite negatively impressed by my results. Has anybody noticed such bad performance? raffaele I never used Mdk 9, but I can tell you I was impressed with the speed of 10.0, both CE and

Re: [newbie] 10.0 slower than 9.2?

2004-05-18 Thread John Drouhard
On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 09:55 +0200, Raffaele BELARDI wrote: Simple test: same movies that in 9.2 played fine and smooth in 10.0 skip LOTS of frames. I tried with mplayer, xine and totem, always the same result. Yes, it's an old mobo (AMD K6-2/550), but in 9.2 it did its job. What video card

[newbie] 10.0 slower than 9.2?

2004-05-14 Thread Raffaele BELARDI
Simple test: same movies that in 9.2 played fine and smooth in 10.0 skip LOTS of frames. I tried with mplayer, xine and totem, always the same result. Yes, it's an old mobo (AMD K6-2/550), but in 9.2 it did its job. So I successfully installed the 2.4.25 kernel provided on the 10.0 cd, but was