JoeHill wrote:
It seems to be sending three copies of your mail to the list, too! Maybe that's
what's slowing your system down... ;-)
:-)
raf
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club
Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
I never used Mdk 9, but I can tell you I was impressed with the speed of 10.0,
both CE and Official. I revived an ancient (~6 years old) NT machine, Pentium
II 400MHz, graphics card so old it's no longer supported by the vendor. I was
surprised how responsive it is on
Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
I never used Mdk 9, but I can tell you I was impressed with the speed of 10.0,
both CE and Official. I revived an ancient (~6 years old) NT machine, Pentium
II 400MHz, graphics card so old it's no longer supported by the vendor. I was
surprised how responsive it is on
Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
I never used Mdk 9, but I can tell you I was impressed with the speed of 10.0,
both CE and Official. I revived an ancient (~6 years old) NT machine, Pentium
II 400MHz, graphics card so old it's no longer supported by the vendor. I was
surprised how responsive it is on
On Thu, 20 May 2004 11:15:30 +0200
Raffaele BELARDI disseminated the following:
I never used Mdk 9, but I can tell you I was impressed with the speed of
10.0,
both CE and Official. I revived an ancient (~6 years old) NT machine,
Pentium
II 400MHz, graphics card so old it's no longer
John Drouhard wrote:
On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 09:55 +0200, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
Simple test: same movies that in 9.2 played fine and smooth in 10.0 skip
LOTS of frames
What video card do you have? If it's an nvidia card, you might need to
Nope, it's an ATI Radeon 7xxx (don't remember exact
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Raffaele BELARDI
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 10:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] 10.0 slower than 9.2?
John Drouhard wrote:
On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 09:55 +0200, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
Simple test: same movies
On May 14, 2004 01:55, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
...
I remember somebody defining 10.0 speed daemon so I was quite
negatively impressed by my results. Has anybody noticed such bad
performance?
raffaele
I never used Mdk 9, but I can tell you I was impressed with the speed of 10.0,
both CE and
On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 09:55 +0200, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
Simple test: same movies that in 9.2 played fine and smooth in 10.0 skip
LOTS of frames. I tried with mplayer, xine and totem, always the same
result. Yes, it's an old mobo (AMD K6-2/550), but in 9.2 it did its job.
What video card
Simple test: same movies that in 9.2 played fine and smooth in 10.0 skip
LOTS of frames. I tried with mplayer, xine and totem, always the same
result. Yes, it's an old mobo (AMD K6-2/550), but in 9.2 it did its job.
So I successfully installed the 2.4.25 kernel provided on the 10.0 cd,
but was
10 matches
Mail list logo