On Mon, 03 Mar 2003 03:17, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 02 Mar 2003 9:18 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 20:06, Richard Urwin wrote:
On Sunday 02 Mar 2003 7:19 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
What I find so shocking about the whole bit is that M$ PROMISED that
they're not spying
On Sunday 02 Mar 2003 7:19 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
For those that still have to use M$ Windows for some reason - any
reason; just what do YOU think M$ knows when you connect to the Windows
Update site?
http://www.tecchannel.de/betriebssysteme/1126/index.html
All very interesting in a look
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 20:06, Richard Urwin wrote:
On Sunday 02 Mar 2003 7:19 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
For those that still have to use M$ Windows for some reason - any
reason; just what do YOU think M$ knows when you connect to the Windows
Update site?
Newbie
Subject: Re: [newbie] ARTICLE: Windows Update security unveiled
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 20:06, Richard Urwin wrote:
On Sunday 02 Mar 2003 7:19 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
For those that still have to use M$ Windows for some reason - any
reason; just what do YOU think M$ knows when you
On Sunday 02 Mar 2003 9:18 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
Sorry to rant, but it's truly driving me further away from MS products.
That's the main reason that this machine is now 100% Linux. I've paid for all
my previous Windows installs, but XP was a step too far. I decided to get off
the wagon and get
That's the main reason that this machine is now 100% Linux. I've
paid for all
my previous Windows installs, but XP was a step too far. I
decided to get off
the wagon and get onto one going in a direction I agreed with.
For those of you who dual boot, for GOD sakes, buy a $60 computer off
PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephen Kuhn
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 3:19 AM
To: Mandrake Newbie
Subject: Re: [newbie] ARTICLE: Windows Update security unveiled
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 20:06, Richard Urwin wrote:
On Sunday 02 Mar 2003 7:19 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
For those that still have
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 21:28, Robert Wideman wrote:
Forgot to say thanks for this info Stephen.
Rob
Ay - no worries mate...BTW, I haven't paid for an M$ product since the
first day that Win95 came out - and got it on CD with a few extra boot
disks - BECAUSE I wanted it THEN - and the beta
Dennis Sue wrote:
On Sunday 02 March 2003 05:08 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
.
That is why i like MDK so much is
that they are a true company that is still giving their OS for free and
On Sunday 02 Mar 2003 9:18 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 20:06, Richard Urwin wrote:
On Sunday 02 Mar 2003 7:19 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
What I find so shocking about the whole bit is that M$ PROMISED that
they're not spying on your system
I may be niaive, but how can they
What I find so shocking about the whole bit is that M$ PROMISED that
they're not spying on your system
I may be niaive, but how can they offer you updates for the software you
have installed, without looking to see what is one your computer?
That, I wouldn't have a problem with. Provided
On Sunday 02 March 2003 09:17 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
I wonder if the Chinese - whom Big Bad Bill is going to visit, fully
understand the gist of security issues by signing on the dotted line...
I would guess so. There are some very savvy people out there.
Anne
If they don't know,
On Sunday 02 March 2003 10:27 am, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
If they don't know, tell'em to talk to the Germans - they dropped Windows
because they said that Microsoft had it setup to report stuff on their
military back to our military.
Sorry, forgot to add the link! :-)
On Sunday March 2 2003 06:21 am, Dennis Sue wrote:
I wonder if the Chinese - whom Big Bad Bill is going to visit,
fully understand the gist of security issues by signing on the
dotted line...
I'm sure they will have a special site just to themselves. Where M$
promises not to spy on them.
On Sunday 02 Mar 2003 3:27 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Sunday 02 March 2003 09:17 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
I wonder if the Chinese - whom Big Bad Bill is going to visit, fully
understand the gist of security issues by signing on the dotted line...
I would guess so. There are some very
This isn't meant as an insult ,so don't take it that way.
You sound like others I have heard. Almost apologetic about
the fact that
some distros made a profit, or intend to.
As though they have somehow soiled the O.S. movement with money.
Profit is not a dirty word. It is a necessary thing
On Sunday 02 March 2003 10:40 am, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Sunday March 2 2003 06:21 am, Dennis Sue wrote:
I wonder if the Chinese - whom Big Bad Bill is going to visit,
fully understand the gist of security issues by signing on the
dotted line...
I'm sure they will have a special
Tom:
You bring up a good point. The only valid conclusion is that
either they are
perjurers and monopolists, or traitors and monopolists. Don't hold your
breath waiting for John Ashcroft to announce that anyone has
been indicted,
though.
I would say they are Traitors and Monopolists.
For those that still have to use M$ Windows for some reason - any
reason; just what do YOU think M$ knows when you connect to the Windows
Update site?
http://www.tecchannel.de/betriebssysteme/1126/index.html
--
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 18:15:01 +1100
6:15pm up 4 days, 8:18, 5 users, load average:
19 matches
Mail list logo
