Original Message
Subject: Re: [newbie] Generic1280x1024@60Hz / Display Programmes
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:38:06 +0100
From: John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTE
On Thursday 25 July 2002 10:08 am, you wrote:
> Personally I prefer 16 bit since it works the video card and CPU less hard,
> and it really is quite difficult to tell the difference.
and quite a few games prefer 16-bit and perform better at that depth.
--
On Thursday 25 Jul 2002 2:38 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
> >>[ws] sorry, this color depth is not enough.
> >>.
> >>.. .
> >
> >Well, near the beginning it says your X sess
Derek Jennings wrote:
>On Thursday 25 Jul 2002 10:27 am, John Richard Smith wrote:
>
>
>>OK, so I now have a screen resolution that compares with the windblows
>>screen resolution using geforce3 video card.
>>
>>Much improved it is too.
>>
>>But none of my video display programmes will load.
>>
On Thursday 25 Jul 2002 10:27 am, John Richard Smith wrote:
> OK, so I now have a screen resolution that compares with the windblows
> screen resolution using geforce3 video card.
>
> Much improved it is too.
>
> But none of my video display programmes will load.
> Starting with MPlayer, this is a
On Thursday July 25 2002 04:27 am, John Richard Smith wrote:
> OK, so I now have a screen resolution that compares with the
> windblows screen resolution using geforce3 video card.
> Seems like it doesn't like something,so I reran the tar ball install,
> just to see whether it would pickup on som
OK, so I now have a screen resolution that compares with the windblows
screen resolution using geforce3 video card.
Much improved it is too.
But none of my video display programmes will load.
Starting with MPlayer, this is a typical load sequence failure:-
..
