Re: [newbie] Mandrake 9.1 and HDD S.M.A.R.T. Capability

2003-06-25 Thread FemmeFatale
At 09:27 PM 6/23/2003 -0700, you wrote: I had the same alarm bells going off. The ONTRACK disk overlay and Linux have always been incompatible (or so I thought). If your bios has SMART capability, I assume that your mobo is new, so I can't figure out why you would need ONTRACK, except that

RE: [newbie] Mandrake 9.1 and HDD S.M.A.R.T. Capability

2003-06-25 Thread Albert Charron
-Original Message- From: FemmeFatale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] Mandrake 9.1 and HDD S.M.A.R.T. Capability At 02:19 PM 6/23/2003 -0400, you wrote: On Monday 23 June 2003 08:34 am, sstubbs wrote: Anyone know

Re: [newbie] Mandrake 9.1 and HDD S.M.A.R.T. Capability

2003-06-24 Thread The Other
06/24/03 Sorry for the confusion. I was only using ONTRACK (from a floppy disk) to get the partition table wiped clean so I could format the entire disk. I never could get FDISK to remove the Linux partions in the extended partition, so I could remove the extended partion. Thanks for the reply

Re: [newbie] Mandrake 9.1 and HDD S.M.A.R.T. Capability

2003-06-24 Thread L.V.Gandhi
On Tuesday 24 Jun 2003 2:58 am, Tom Brinkman wrote: As to the subject, SMART, I believe y'all would be better off disabling this useless marketing gimick. When it does manage to work, it's already too late most all the time, and it will constantly impose an overhead on IDE transfers while

[newbie] Mandrake 9.1 and HDD S.M.A.R.T. Capability

2003-06-23 Thread sstubbs
06/23/03 Hello All, from The Other Last week was very frustrating. The slave Maxtor drive went back to PC Peripherals (this was an OEM drive), so I decided to continue the dual-boot Win95B and Mandrake 9.1 system on the remaining master Western Digital drive. Total disaster. Linux wouldn't

[newbie] Mandrake 9.1 and HDD S.M.A.R.T. Capability

2003-06-23 Thread sstubbs
06/23/03 Hello All, from The Other Last week was very frustrating. The slave Maxtor drive went back to PC Peripherals (this was an OEM drive), so I decided to continue the dual-boot Win95B and Mandrake 9.1 system on the remaining master Western Digital drive. Total disaster. Linux wouldn't

Re: [newbie] Mandrake 9.1 and HDD S.M.A.R.T. Capability

2003-06-23 Thread FemmeFatale
At 07:49 AM 6/23/2003 -0500, you wrote: SNIPs some hummingbirds ... you finish the thought... My guess is that Win95B and NT 4.0 have never heard about HDD S.M.A.R.T Capability, and didn't try to write to the Western Digital using it. Whereas Mandrake 9.1 is new and sophisticated enough to know

Re: [newbie] Mandrake 9.1 and HDD S.M.A.R.T. Capability

2003-06-23 Thread FemmeFatale
At 02:19 PM 6/23/2003 -0400, you wrote: On Monday 23 June 2003 08:34 am, sstubbs wrote: Anyone know different? Don't know if it has anything to do with your problems at all, but Civileme used to say to avoid WD drives like the plague... claimed they did not do CRC stuff right, especially at

Re: [newbie] Mandrake 9.1 and HDD S.M.A.R.T. Capability

2003-06-23 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Monday June 23 2003 02:57 pm, FemmeFatale wrote: Don't know if it has anything to do with your problems at all, but Civileme used to say to avoid WD drives like the plague... claimed they did not do CRC stuff right, especially at higher DMA/UDMA levels :-(

Re: [newbie] Mandrake 9.1 and HDD S.M.A.R.T. Capability

2003-06-23 Thread Erylon Hines
I had the same alarm bells going off. The ONTRACK disk overlay and Linux have always been incompatible (or so I thought). If your bios has SMART capability, I assume that your mobo is new, so I can't figure out why you would need ONTRACK, except that ONTRACK is installed on your old drive.