Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-10 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 10 Jul 2003 2:20 pm, Lanman wrote: > Doug and Anne; As soon as I get some feeling back into my > fingertips ( one of my last posts was lengthy - to say the least! > ), I'll probably forward it to you both, and hopefully you can put > it on the TWiki site. I'm not sure I'll be able to do

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-10 Thread Lanman
Doug and Anne; As soon as I get some feeling back into my fingertips ( one of my last posts was lengthy - to say the least! ), I'll probably forward it to you both, and hopefully you can put it on the TWiki site. I'm not sure I'll be able to do it as quickly as either of you, and I'm going to be

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-10 Thread Douglas Bainbridge
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 04:22, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Wednesday 09 Jul 2003 7:25 pm, Lanman wrote: > > For those needing a work-around for bastille-firewall, I just > > wanted to update you. > > I'm beginning to sound like a stuck record - when you've finished, > will you put it on the TWiki, pl

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-10 Thread Lanman
You've already taught me things in the past Anne. I've found many of your psts to be very informative. This is just another installment we can add to that list. Lanman *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 7/10/2003 at 8:45 AM Anne Wilson wrote: > I can teach you something? Never! > >R

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-10 Thread Anne Wilson
I can teach you something? Never! Right - a community owned and edited web. Ours is at http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/WebHome You need to sign up as a user to gain editing rights. There are only a few formatting commands that you need to use, and you can get them by studying an e

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-09 Thread Lanman
Hey Anne; Long time no hear! UM, what's a Twiki? And where is it? Take Care! Lanman *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 7/10/2003 at 4:22 AM Anne Wilson wrote: >On Wednesday 09 Jul 2003 7:25 pm, Lanman wrote: >> For those needing a work-around for bastille-firewall, I just >> wanted t

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-09 Thread Lanman
Femme; Actually, after being an MCSE (Gak! Choke! Kaff!) for several years, it was one of the only useful things I took away from that experience. Lanman is something from Microsoft called the "Microsoft Windows Lanman Remote API Protocol (lanman)", and was also loosely called LAN Manager. Since

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-09 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 09 Jul 2003 7:25 pm, Lanman wrote: > For those needing a work-around for bastille-firewall, I just > wanted to update you. I'm beginning to sound like a stuck record - when you've finished, will you put it on the TWiki, please? Anne Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSo

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-09 Thread Dennis Myers
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 08:06 pm, FemmeFatale wrote: > At 07:53 PM 7/9/2003 -0400, you wrote: > >Dear Femme; > >What's NOT to like? > > > >Back to you Femme! > > > >Lanman > > U needn't sell it to me dear. And ty, your own nicks unique too heh. > > Just wondering why it doesn't work with 9/1 LM

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-09 Thread Lanman
Dear Femme; ( By the way, I love the handle!), wouldv'e gotten here sooner, but I was having too much fun screwing with Joe's brain. For the record, I don't use Bastille as a hardening tool, just as a firewall. One thing though, it apparently has an "Undo" option or command. But for most home n

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-09 Thread FemmeFatale
At 01:55 PM 7/9/2003 -0400, you wrote: On Tuesday 08 July 2003 04:15 pm, FemmeFatale wrote: > lord i suffered with this when i started with Bastille...its not intuitive > so don't fret. At a command prompt type Interative-Bastille (or just Inter > (then hit the TAB key)) and away you go. Be sure

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-09 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 04:15 pm, FemmeFatale wrote: > lord i suffered with this when i started with Bastille...its not intuitive > so don't fret. At a command prompt type Interative-Bastille (or just Inter > (then hit the TAB key)) and away you go. Be sure to get the GUIed ver (TK > or Curses v

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-09 Thread Lanman
For those needing a work-around for bastille-firewall, I just wanted to update you. Based on the current dependancies regarding Mandrake-Linux 9.0 and 9.1, it is not possible to install or run "tinyfirewall". If it can't be run, you will be unable to acquire the bastille-firewall.cfg file requir

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-09 Thread Lanman
Peter; I'm working on putting a plain-language mini-howto together for Bastille. I should have it later today. Check back in a couple of hours. I'm having a bit of trouble finding a default config file for Bastille. Once I have one from a current version of Bastille, I'll modify it so that it ma

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-09 Thread Curt Tresenriter
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 20:52, Lanman wrote: > If you'd like a work-around for bastille-firewall on Mandrake 9.0, 9.1, let me know. > You'll probably laugh your ass off when you find out what I did to get it working! > > Lanman > I like to see that... tried Bastille yesterday and no go. Want to

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-09 Thread Peter Meyns
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 21:52:03 -0400 Lanman wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > If you'd like a work-around for bastille-firewall on Mandrake 9.0, 9.1, > let me know. You'll probably laugh your ass off when you find out what I > did to get it working! I would, as I'm trying to get it running on Mandr

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-08 Thread bpx
I tried the 2.1.1 rpm and it came up at start up saying it does not work on Mandrake 9.1. I don't see a newer version on their site. Barry > >Femme; Is someone trying to use Bastille on a Mandrake 9.0 or 9.1 system? I> thought it woldn't work on those versions of Mandrake. Has there been a ch>an

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-08 Thread Lanman
If you'd like a work-around for bastille-firewall on Mandrake 9.0, 9.1, let me know. You'll probably laugh your ass off when you find out what I did to get it working! Lanman *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 7/8/2003 at 7:39 PM FemmeFatale wrote: >At 08:51 PM 7/8/2003 -0400, you wro

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-08 Thread FemmeFatale
At 08:51 PM 7/8/2003 -0400, you wrote: Femme; Is someone trying to use Bastille on a Mandrake 9.0 or 9.1 system? I thought it woldn't work on those versions of Mandrake. Has there been a change? I still prefer the firewall in Bastille, but I had to devise a work-around in order to get it running

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-08 Thread Lanman
Femme; Is someone trying to use Bastille on a Mandrake 9.0 or 9.1 system? I thought it woldn't work on those versions of Mandrake. Has there been a change? I still prefer the firewall in Bastille, but I had to devise a work-around in order to get it running a Mandrake 9.x . Please let me know if

Re[2]: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-08 Thread Peter Meyns
Hello FemmeFatale, on Tue, 08 Jul 2003 14:15:09 -0600GMT (08.07.03, 22:15 +0200GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : >>How do I start it? > lord i suffered with this when i started with Bastille...its not intuitive > so don't fret. Thanks for the encouragement. :-) > At a command pro

Re: Bastille firewall [was: Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux]

2003-07-08 Thread FemmeFatale
At 09:19 PM 7/8/2003 +0200, you wrote: On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 17:05:46 -0600 FemmeFatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in another thread: > > or another packet filter perhaps? > Bastille is a better firewall IMO Thank you. The description on the web looks very good. I downloaded and most probably instal

Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux

2003-07-07 Thread FemmeFatale
At 08:25 PM 7/7/2003 +0200, you wrote: On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 21:08:39 +0100 Derek Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You might like to delete your /etc/shorewall folder before reinstalling > the firewall. > That way you can be sure of starting with a virgin configuration. Thank you Derek, I did tha

Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux

2003-07-06 Thread Derek Jennings
You might like to delete your /etc/shorewall folder before reinstalling the firewall. That way you can be sure of starting with a virgin configuration. If you want help with your kmail post full details of what goes wrong. derek On Sunday 06 Jul 2003 8:15 pm, Peter Meyns wrote: > Am Sonntag, 6

Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux

2003-07-06 Thread Peter Meyns
Am Sonntag, 6. Juli 2003 18:43 schrieb Derek Jennings: > If you installed by RPM then you can remove shorewall with > > urpme shorewall > in a root terminal. Thanks! That helped me back to internet connection. :) > Shorewall will be installed automatically if you ask the Mandrake > Control Centr

Re: [newbie] No connection via Linux

2003-07-06 Thread Derek Jennings
If you installed by RPM then you can remove shorewall with urpme shorewall in a root terminal. I am not sure what the "one-interface.tar.gz" you installed is. Where did you find it? Shorewall will be installed automatically if you ask the Mandrake Control Centre to set up a firewall for you. T

[newbie] No connection via Linux

2003-07-06 Thread meynsweb
Hi all, I installed Mandrake 9.1 a couple of months ago on a dual-boot system along with Windows 98. It worked quite well so far, but still it is more configuring and learning than actually /using/ it... I have been lurking a bit on this list via KMail, although I feel a bit slain by the sheer am