-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Meyer
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] RAM Questions
On Saturday 08 February 2003 12:44 pm, Russ wrote:
> okay, I do have onboard video but I h
On Saturday 08 February 2003 12:44 pm, Russ wrote:
> okay, I do have onboard video but I have an agp video card installed. I
> wonder is MD is getting confused? (it did fined my agp card though).
> Anyway, next time I install MD I will look at the ram and see what it is
> seeing.
>
> I am experimen
On Saturday 08 February 2003 09:24 am, Russ wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I understand that the swap partition should be about twice that of your
> physical ram. I have 256megs and when I allow MD to partition itself, that
> is the size of the swap partition it makes. Shouldn't it be 512?
>
> I seem to reme
okay, I do have onboard video but I have an agp video card installed. I
wonder is MD is getting confused? (it did fined my agp card though). Anyway,
next time I install MD I will look at the ram and see what it is seeing.
I am experimenting with various configurations with MD9 and RedHat 8. There
On Saturday February 8 2003 10:24 am, Russ wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I understand that the swap partition should be about twice that of
> your physical ram. I have 256megs and when I allow MD to partition
> itself, that is the size of the swap partition it makes. Shouldn't
> it be 512?
>
> I seem to rem
On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:47 am, Gregory K. Meyer, CPA wrote:
> On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:38 am, Gregory K. Meyer, CPA wrote:
> > On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:24 am, Russ wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I understand that the swap partition should be about twice that of your
> > > ph
On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:57 am, Adolfo Bello wrote:
> At this moment I am recompiling the kernel (for the third times this
> week :-( due to a problem with X not starting) and the swap has already
> been used by the system even when my computer has 512Mb ram (aroound
> 350Mb free acording t
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 12:38, Gregory K. Meyer, CPA wrote:
> The rule I follow is
>
> 2x RAM when physical RAM is 128MB or less;
> 1x RAM when physical RAM is 256MB but greater than 128;
> never a bigger swap than 256MB
>
> In monitoring, I have never had my swap usage get above 80MB when my phy
On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:38 am, Gregory K. Meyer, CPA wrote:
> On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:24 am, Russ wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I understand that the swap partition should be about twice that of your
> > physical ram. I have 256megs and when I allow MD to partition itself,
> > that is
Thanks for the response. I'll let MD deal with it then.
Russ
- Original Message -
> On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:24 am, Russ wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I understand that the swap partition should be about twice that of your
> > physical ram. I have 256megs and when I allow MD to partiti
On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:24 am, Russ wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I understand that the swap partition should be about twice that of your
> physical ram. I have 256megs and when I allow MD to partition itself, that
> is the size of the swap partition it makes. Shouldn't it be 512?
>
> I seem to reme
Hi All,
I understand that the swap partition should be about twice that of your
physical ram. I have 256megs and when I allow MD to partition itself, that
is the size of the swap partition it makes. Shouldn't it be 512?
I seem to remember (from previous tries in the past) that there was an issue
12 matches
Mail list logo
