On Monday 16 Feb 2004 12:07 am, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Sunday 15 February 2004 06:05 pm, Erylon Hines wrote:
-Well, it does run it's tests on each message, but even on dial-up I don't
-notice a slowdown that I would consider significant. My wife gets
hundreds -of messages a day, and the
On Monday 16 Feb 2004 4:11 am, Erylon Hines wrote:
On Sunday 15 February 2004 06:21 pm, Chris wrote:
Being a newbie to spamassassin also, just set it up over the past week
using CPAN to upgrade to the newest version. I've got actually two
filters setup for spamassassin, one being size is
On Monday 16 February 2004 05:48 am, Derek Jennings wrote:
-If in kmail you pipe through 'spamc', then you must have the spamd daemon
-running.
-
-But if you pipe through 'spamassassin', then spamd is not used and you can
-safely stop it.
-The difference is that spamd is written in C and will be
On Monday 16 Feb 2004 7:57 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Monday 16 February 2004 05:48 am, Derek Jennings wrote:
-If in kmail you pipe through 'spamc', then you must have the spamd daemon
-running.
-
-But if you pipe through 'spamassassin', then spamd is not used and you
can -safely stop it.
On Friday 13 February 2004 01:50 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
Hmm, I use Kmail and was following another thread where Spamassassin was
detailed (Derek J. I believe).
I followed it as best as I could, but I've got a couple of questions.
Speed. Wow. It slows my email download from cable speeds to
On Sunday 15 February 2004 06:05 pm, Erylon Hines wrote:
-Well, it does run it's tests on each message, but even on dial-up I don't
-notice a slowdown that I would consider significant. My wife gets hundreds
-of messages a day, and the download process doesn't irritate her.
I can live with it,
On Sunday 15 February 2004 04:07 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
I can live with it, but it is at least 3 times slower than before.
I'm not sure either, but I killed spamd and it played fine. It *could* have
been coincidence - I've seen greater ones. grin
I'm running with Kmail only. I don't
On Sunday 15 February 2004 06:07 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Sunday 15 February 2004 06:05 pm, Erylon Hines wrote:
I'm running with Kmail only. I don't have pipe through spamc or spamd,
its pipe through spamassassin. Is that wrong?
Yes, no large messages checked. (don't get that many
On Sunday 15 February 2004 06:21 pm, Chris wrote:
Being a newbie to spamassassin also, just set it up over the past week
using CPAN to upgrade to the newest version. I've got actually two filters
setup for spamassassin, one being size is less than 25000, filter action
is to pipe through
On Sunday 15 February 2004 09:21 pm, Chris wrote:
-Being a newbie to spamassassin also, just set it up over the past week
using -CPAN to upgrade to the newest version. I've got actually two
filters setup -for spamassassin, one being size is less than 25000, filter
action is to -pipe through
Hmm, I use Kmail and was following another thread where Spamassassin was
detailed (Derek J. I believe).
I followed it as best as I could, but I've got a couple of questions.
Speed. Wow. It slows my email download from cable speeds to dial up speeds.
I'm talking 3-5 times longer here. Any way to
11 matches
Mail list logo
