Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and update

2001-03-01 Thread brk
PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 6:37 PM Subject: Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and update It might have been just as easy for the tech to wave the RAM back and forth in the air a few times - lightly touch it to his forehead - chant "Ibeebeebeee

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and update

2001-02-28 Thread Scott Faulkner
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Johnson Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 8:58 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM Naa, I can't believe this, I have a 256 stick that crashed three computers continuously

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and update

2001-02-28 Thread Linux Tests
, February 22, 2001 8:45 AM ##To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' ##Subject: RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM ## ## ##This is the funny thing about my situation, no crashes, no weird things ##going on, I just can't get linux to recognize my ram. The system doesn't ##even seem to run any slower, transfers of

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and update

2001-02-28 Thread Dennis Myers
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, you wrote: It might have been just as easy for the tech to wave the RAM back and forth in the air a few times - lightly touch it to his forehead - chant "Ibeebeebeeeboo" five times - blinking the lights off and on with the other hand while twirling about ... He'd have

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and update

2001-02-28 Thread Dennis Myers
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, you wrote: On Monday 26 February 2001 16:01, you wrote: I took the suspect ram sticks back to the shop where I bought them and the tech put it in a windows box and booted it up. It booted right up, so they said the memory was tested ok. They gave me an exchange

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and update

2001-02-28 Thread Dennis Myers
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, you wrote: On Monday 26 February 2001 16:01, you wrote: I took the suspect ram sticks back to the shop where I bought them and the tech put it in a windows box and booted it up. It booted right up, so they said the memory was tested ok. They gave me an exchange

RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and update

2001-02-27 Thread Myers, Dennis R NWO
Title: RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM I took the suspect ram sticks back to the shop where I bought them and the tech put it in a windows box and booted it up. It booted right up, so they said the memory was tested ok. They gave me an exchange anyway, but I thought it interesting

RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and update

2001-02-27 Thread Jose M. Sanchez
that even hardware testers and good test suites do not. -JMS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Myers, Dennis R NWO Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 11:01 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and updat

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-25 Thread abe
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Johnson Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:31 PM To: LinuxNewbie (E-mail) Subject: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM I am suspicious that my RAM is bad. Is there anyway in linux that I can confirm this? Abe, Where does one fi

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-24 Thread Mark Weaver
2001 1:31 PM To: LinuxNewbie (E-mail) Subject: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM I am suspicious that my RAM is bad. Is there anyway in linux that I can confirm this? Abe, Where does one find and buy a copy of this amazing program? -- Mark "If you don't share your conc

RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-22 Thread Franki
Title: RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM well that is sort true,, if you bios is set to fast boot, the chances are that it is not doing a full test of the ram,,, You would be better of booting from a floppy with something like microscope or PCcheckit... and do a full test

RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-22 Thread Mark Johnson
Title: RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM Naa, I can't believe this, I have a 256 stick that crashed three computers continuously and it counted up in the bios just fine in all three. This 128 stick isn't quite so ruthless on me but linux apps keep crashing on me left and right and weird

RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-22 Thread Myers, Dennis R NWO
Title: RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM This is the funny thing about my situation, no crashes, no weird things going on, I just can't get linux to recognize my ram. The system doesn't even seem to run any slower, transfers of web pages and searches are as fast as ever. I am thinking

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-22 Thread goldenpi
PM Subject: Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM On this subject of RAM incompatibility... I have a stick of RAM that someone gave me to boost me up past 64mb. When I first installed it it would do ok, but then it would get where sometimes it would show on boot up and others it wouldn't

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-22 Thread Linux Tests
rk Johnson ## Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:31 PM ## To: LinuxNewbie (E-mail) ## Subject: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM ## ## I am suspicious that my RAM is bad. Is there anyway in linux that I ## can ## confirm this?

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-22 Thread Linux Tests
Sorry, I respectfully disagree with some of this. A techs time is too expensive to go through BIOS settings. Always stick with the BIOS defaults. Period. DO NOT make changes to your BIOS. Plus simplify the testing process. Keep the BIOS at default. Use RST - and OS independent tester -

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-22 Thread Linux Tests
and weird things like the logout won't work sometimes in X... ## ##-Original Message- ##From: Myers, Dennis R NWO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ##Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 2:20 PM ##To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' ##Subject: RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM ## ## ## ##I've been told by local

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-22 Thread abe
lf Of Mark Johnson ## Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:31 PM ## To: LinuxNewbie (E-mail) ## Subject: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM ## ## I am suspicious that my RAM is bad. Is there anyway in linux that I ## can ## confirm this?

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-22 Thread abe
I second this. Quick Tech is the program that I recommend. It is available from http://www.uxd.com as was mentioned below. It is amazing. Well worth the money. Worth its weight in gold actually. Although I do disagree with always keeping BIOS defaults. Definately keep them for ram timings

RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-21 Thread Myers, Dennis R NWO
Title: RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM I've been told by local computer techs that if your bios sees the ram at bootup ,( in other words detects it and counts it off on the first screen that shows your primary and secondary IDE devices and you can hit del to get to bios) then the ram memory

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-21 Thread Scott Faulkner
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Johnson Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:31 PM To: LinuxNewbie (E-mail) Subject: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM I am suspicious that my RAM is bad. Is there anyway in linux that I can

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-21 Thread Heather
On this subject of RAM incompatibility... I have a stick of RAM that someone gave me to boost me up past 64mb. When I first installed it it would do ok, but then it would get where sometimes it would show on boot up and others it wouldn't then (in evil windows since i haven't put it back after

[newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-20 Thread Mark Johnson
I am suspicious that my RAM is bad. Is there anyway in linux that I can confirm this?