On Monday 01 September 2003 04:01 am, Keith Powell wrote:
> I sent three postings yesterday, but none of have appeared on the list. So
> here goes again.
>
> Sorry, Bryan, if you thought my posting was a knee-jerk action. It wasn't
> meant to be.
Anytime someone asks other people to consider aband
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 09:05:33AM +0100, Keith Powell wrote:
> On Sunday 31 Aug 2003 9:58 am, Anders Lind wrote:
> > > Ah well, there's always IceWM or Gnome.
> >
> > XFCE 4 is gonna be off the chart, use that instead ;o)
> >
> > /Anders
>
> Hello Anders.
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> I have tr
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:05:33 +0100
Keith Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have tried XFCE for the first time, and have mixed feelings about it. It may
> be because I have not got to grips with it, but it seems to be rather limited
> in what it can do. Comparing the program as supplied on Mandr
I sent three postings yesterday, but none of have appeared on the list. So
here goes again.
On Sunday 31 Aug 2003 5:10 pm, Bryan Phinney wrote:
>
> People, before we go tarnishing a good company due to spurious rumors, can
> we please make sure that we have *ALL* of the facts straight. While it
Yesterday, I sent three postings to the list. None of them have appeared, so
here is another try.
On Sunday 31 Aug 2003 1:54 pm, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> On Sunday 31 August 2003 08:10 am, Keith Powell wrote:
> > On Sunday 31 Aug 2003 2:21 am, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> > > And here comes the bad news :
On Sunday 31 Aug 2003 9:58 am, Anders Lind wrote:
> > Ah well, there's always IceWM or Gnome.
>
> XFCE 4 is gonna be off the chart, use that instead ;o)
>
> /Anders
Hello Anders.
Thanks for the reply.
I have tried XFCE for the first time, and have mixed feelings about it. It may
be because I hav
