On Thursday 10 Mar 2005 02:59, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Thursday 10 March 2005 03:47 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
No - that wouldn't make sense. I'm using the same View for all the
messages, and some show the iconised attachment while others show it in
full, so it must be something in the
On Thursday 10 March 2005 03:18 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
Take a look at the difference between your messages and Mikkel's.
Anne
I'm sorry, but I don't see any difference between his email and mine? In the
footer? No, it's the same. Strange.
--
Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 |
On Thursday 10 Mar 2005 14:50, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Thursday 10 March 2005 03:18 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
Take a look at the difference between your messages and Mikkel's.
Anne
I'm sorry, but I don't see any difference between his email and mine? In
the footer? No, it's the same.
On Thursday 10 March 2005 11:49 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 10 Mar 2005 14:50, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Thursday 10 March 2005 03:18 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
Take a look at the difference between your messages and Mikkel's.
Anne
I'm sorry, but I don't see any difference
I never noticed it with the older version of kmail, but now I'm seeing that
some kmail users are displaying Mandrake's footer message in full and others
have it as an attachment. I presume there's a setting somewhere for this?
I'd really rather keep that paper-clip display for things that
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 02:01 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
I never noticed it with the older version of kmail, but now I'm seeing that
some kmail users are displaying Mandrake's footer message in full and
others have it as an attachment. I presume there's a setting somewhere for
this? I'd really
On Wednesday 09 Mar 2005 20:28, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 02:01 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
I never noticed it with the older version of kmail, but now I'm seeing
that some kmail users are displaying Mandrake's footer message in full
and others have it as an attachment. I
On Thursday 10 March 2005 03:47 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
No - that wouldn't make sense. I'm using the same View for all the
messages, and some show the iconised attachment while others show it in
full, so it must be something in the composer setup, I guess.
Anne
Which message that has the
when I put in the info, as a general rule, i do not use the words Password
or login since caps make a difference. I usally use the expect as
assword and ogin and then put the user name, Earthlink changed the way
you need to sigh in a few weeks ago from a format with ELN/username to
[EMAIL
: Saturday, July 21, 2001 2:17 PM
To: srinivas sastry
Subject: Re: [newbie] kmail-configuration of multiple mail accounts
What settings did you use? Did you select the right account type? Most
e-mail accounts use POP3.
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 03:04, srinivas sastry wrote:
hi sridhar
thank
Click Settings - Configure KMail. In the resulting window, click Network and
open the Sending Mail tab (it should be open already). You can add accounts
in the Incoming Mail section -- just click Add.
If you need more info, there's always the Help button.
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:27, srinivas
To: srinivas sastry; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] kmail-configuration of multiple mail accounts
Click Settings - Configure KMail. In the resulting window, click Network and
open the Sending Mail tab (it should be open already). You can add accounts
in the Incoming Mail section -- just
Kmail appends the characters smpt:// to the beginning of my outgoing
mail server. My ISP doesn't like that. Any way to stop it?
Thanks,
--Chase
i have just noticed that when i choose 'reply...' from the right click menu
to a message the recipient is not the list but the original sender - every
time !
is the list malfunctioning by not inserting the 'reply to' header in the
posts back to list subscribers? or do i have my kmail
No, it's not just you. Same happens here. I have to cut paste the newbie
address into the To... box every time.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: bascule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 May 2001 12:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] kmail configuration or list?
i have just
If you choose Reply All it will address it to the original sender
and to the list.
On Thursday 24 May 2001 08:46, bascule wrote:
i have just noticed that when i choose 'reply...' from the right
click menu to a message the recipient is not the list but the
original sender - every time !
is
I experience the same problem. My workaround: use reply-all, which will
then show both the list and the personal email addresses, then remove the
personal address and leave only the list address.
Dave
On Thursday 24 May 2001 06:46, thus spake bascule:
i have just noticed that when i choose
bascule i have just noticed that when i choose 'reply...' from the
bascule right click menu to a message the recipient is not the list but
bascule the original sender - every time !
The list is working *as it should*. If kmail doesn't allow you to reply to
all as well as reply to
On Thursday 24 May 2001 09:03, I was honoured by a missive from Clarkson,
Nick that said :
No, it's not just you. Same happens here. I have to cut paste the newbie
address into the To... box every time.
Workaround: Reply to All, which puts both adresses, sender and list, in the
To: box.
On Thu, 24 May 2001 09:21:48 John Morine wrote:
If you choose Reply All it will address it to the original sender
and to the list.
Which explains why I get two copies of many messages.
Please don't do this!
The mail server should be re-configured to put the listserver address in
the
from
On Thursday 24 May 2001 11:28, you wrote:
bascule i have just noticed that when i choose 'reply...' from the
bascule right click menu to a message the recipient is not the list
but bascule the original sender - every time !
You can always use filter rules to make sure you always
.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: bascule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 May 2001 12:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] kmail configuration or list?
i have just noticed that when i choose 'reply...' from the right click menu
to a message the recipient is not the list
irvm The mail server should be re-configured to put the listserver
irvm address in the from field - see, for example, the Topica lists.
No it shouldn't. See my previous message.
--
Skip Montanaro ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(847)971-7098
On Thursday 24 May 2001 04:55 pm, you wrote:
irvm The mail server should be re-configured to put the listserver
irvm address in the from field - see, for example, the Topica lists.
No it shouldn't. See my previous message.
It used to be that way, click on an old message from
]
Subject: [newbie] kmail configuration or list?
i have just noticed that when i choose 'reply...' from the right click
menu to a message the recipient is not the list but the original sender -
every time !
is the list malfunctioning by not inserting the 'reply to' header
Is there a way to configure kmail in such a way that the "To" listing shows
in addition to From, Subject, and date?
Thanks
Jeff Malka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux user 183185
26 matches
Mail list logo
