Hi all,
I find solution. I rewrited in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 in section for
Device ATI Option from DPMS to NoAccel. Now I can run under X
Windows, but there is second problem :-). If I run for example
TuxRacer, this is a little horrible - it's very slowely.
If you've got MDK 9.0 and ATI Radeon and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 12 October 2002 9:43 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] did speak unto the
huddled masses, saying:
Hi all,
I find solution. I rewrited in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 in section for
Device ATI Option from DPMS to NoAccel. Now I can run under X
Windows,
Hi all,
I'v got MDK 9.0 now and there is some problem with ATI Radeon 7500LE. My PC
is Duron 800 on MB Abit KT7E and monitor Huyndai V570.There was older version
SuSE before and without problem. Instalation is correct until X
configuration. It find graphics card and monitor corretly, but if I
At 10:56 PM 9/26/2002 -0400, you wrote:
s wrote:
On Thursday 26 September 2002 09:08 pm, Colin Jenkins wrote:
Hi all,
Just got 9.0 running after much hair tearing.
d/l'd the iso's, checksum was ok on all, but install locked up
on some files on cd2.
Tried a number of times to no
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[2]: [newbie] mdk9.0
Hello mudder,
Friday, September 27, 2002, 9:06:06 PM, you wrote:
msn I concur,
msn I would also bet you burned them too fast. I've done this a time or two
before.
msn 4x burn is the safest bet. although I have had iso's burned at 6x and
8x
msn
Hello mudder,
Friday, September 27, 2002, 9:06:06 PM, you wrote:
msn I concur,
msn I would also bet you burned them too fast. I've done this a time or two before.
msn 4x burn is the safest bet. although I have had iso's burned at 6x and 8x
msn work fine too.
msn Mudder
just reburnt at
On Friday 27 September 2002 06:49 am, Colin Jenkins wrote:
msn I would also bet you burned them too fast. I've done this a
time or two before. msn 4x burn is the safest bet. although I have
had iso's burned at 6x and 8x msn work fine too.
just reburnt at 4x.. still the same...if I use
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:43:06 -0700
Gary Traffanstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You've had problems with iso's burned at higher speeds? That must be a
problem with your burner because I've burned a lot of iso's at 12x and
have never had a problem. If the burner can burn at whatever speed,
On Friday 27 September 2002 04:06 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled something
about:
At 10:56 PM 9/26/2002 -0400, you wrote:
s wrote:
On Thursday 26 September 2002 09:08 pm, Colin Jenkins wrote:
Hi all,
Just got 9.0 running after much hair tearing.
d/l'd the iso's, checksum was
Hello mudder,
Friday, September 27, 2002, 9:06:06 PM, you wrote:
msn I would also bet you burned them too fast. I've done this a time or two before.
msn 4x burn is the safest bet. although I have had iso's burned at 6x and 8x
msn work fine too.
msn Mudder
yeah... all fixed, replaced
s wrote:
On Thursday 26 September 2002 09:08 pm, Colin Jenkins wrote:
Hi all,
Just got 9.0 running after much hair tearing.
d/l'd the iso's, checksum was ok on all, but install locked up
on some files on cd2.
Tried a number of times to no avail, finally told the
installer I
Hi guys,
Anyone had any experiance with this yet??
I am gonna load it on a server.. (usually dumb I know, but this is only an
apache server, so its doing nothing fancy.) if the kernel works, and apache
works, then I'm happy.
I don't have time to wait for the 9.0 release, so I'll probably just
-
From: Mark Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 27 August 2002 4:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Mdk9.0 beta 4.
Franki wrote:
Hi guys,
Anyone had any experiance with this yet??
I am gonna load it on a server.. (usually dumb I know, but this is only an
apache
13 matches
Mail list logo
