On Thursday 18 December 2003 10:06 pm, Pat Patterson wrote:
At 12:32 PM 12/18/2003 -0600, you wrote:
It's becoming more an more frequent to see success
stories with 3c940's, but 3com support has always lagged in
the past and this is a new NIC. It appears that the sk98lin
driver is
Tom Brinkman wrote:
No, I don't intend to use SATA either. By the time I move
from ATA/133 (which is just as fast), it'll probly be to PCI
Express. For my reasons, search the archive for this list,
Google or the lkml. I think you'll find that SATA sux. Driver
support in the kernel
On Friday 19 December 2003 10:39 pm, Guy Rouillier wrote:
Tom Brinkman wrote:
No, I don't intend to use SATA either. By the time I move
from ATA/133 (which is just as fast), it'll probly be to PCI
Express. For my reasons, search the archive for this list,
Google or the lkml. I
On Thursday 18 Dec 2003 1:54 am, Pat Patterson wrote:
I have been trying to get samba fully functional for a couple of
months now and it has been driving me crazy. My internet connection
worked. The Samba server worked but for some unknown reason that I
researched thoroughly, only some of the
At 08:15 AM 12/18/2003 +, you wrote:
On Thursday 18 Dec 2003 1:54 am, Pat Patterson wrote:
I have been trying to get samba fully functional for a couple of
months now and it has been driving me crazy. My internet connection
worked. The Samba server worked but for some unknown reason that I
At 12:32 PM 12/18/2003 -0600, you wrote:
It's becoming more an more frequent to see success stories
with 3c940's, but 3com support has always lagged in the past and
this is a new NIC. It appears that the sk98lin driver is winning
out, as this NIC uses a chipset furnished by SysKonnect, not
I have been trying to get samba fully functional for a couple of months now
and it has been driving me crazy. My internet connection worked. The Samba
server worked but for some unknown reason that I researched thoroughly,
only some of the machines on my network could be reached from the linux
