I am actually curious as to how someone without internet access
is supposed to get this unlock code. has microsoft addressed this
You are offered the choice to register over the Internet, or read off
the code to MS over the phone, who will then read you out the activation
code, which you will
On Sat, 08 Sep 2001 18:43:01 -0700, Ah Pook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
9/8/2001 7:18:43 AM, etharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
about a million people are going to tell you (and they are correct) that the
GIMP is every bit as good as photoshop, and they do not have the US gov. put
people in
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sridhar Dhanapalan
Sent: 09 September 2001 04:07
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ah Pook
Subject: Re: FW: [newbie] OT: Win XP hacked already
On Sat, 08 Sep 2001 18:43:01 -0700, Ah Pook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
9/8/2001 7:18:43 AM, etharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
about a million
about a million people are going to tell you (and they are correct) that the
GIMP is every bit as good as photoshop, and they do not have the US gov. put
people in jail for talking about how poor their encryption is under the DMCA.
you might also consider that while dreamweaver sites appear
On Saturday 08 September 2001 11:56, richied wrote:
On September 8, 2001 09:42 am, Siavash Sefidvash wrote:
Apologies for sounding naive, but is not fair to get paid for your
efforts.?
...There's actually a bigger issue at stake. Win XP is actually taking a
fingerpint of your system.
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001 12:58:30 -0400, jennifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 08 September 2001 11:56, richied wrote:
On September 8, 2001 09:42 am, Siavash Sefidvash wrote:
Apologies for sounding naive, but is not fair to get paid for your
efforts.?
...There's actually a bigger
]
Subject: Re: FW: [newbie] OT: Win XP hacked already
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 12:58:30 -0400
On Saturday 08 September 2001 11:56, richied wrote:
On September 8, 2001 09:42 am, Siavash Sefidvash wrote:
Apologies for sounding naive, but is not fair to get paid for your
efforts.?
...There's
On Saturday 08 September 2001 12:57 pm, Sridhar Dhanapalan escribió:
Take a look at this article:
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/comment/0,5859,2810195,00.html
Here's an excerpt:
For those who haven't yet experienced it, the new scheme is
concealed under the 'Product Activation'
Apologies for sounding naive, but is not fair to get paid for your efforts.?
If not Zhiang Zemin and Chinese polit bureaux would really like to hire
you...that part of the world is Mecca for this sort of thing. I don't mind
paying £100 for a developers application.
However I realize that's
On September 8, 2001 09:42 am, Siavash Sefidvash wrote:
Apologies for sounding naive, but is not fair to get paid for your
efforts.?
...There's actually a bigger issue at stake. Win XP is actually taking a
fingerpint of your system. Your NIC, HDD, CD-ROM, CPU, etc all have unique
serial
9/8/2001 7:18:43 AM, etharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
about a million people are going to tell you (and they are correct) that the
GIMP is every bit as good as photoshop, and they do not have the US gov. put
people in jail for talking about how poor their encryption is under the DMCA.
On Saturday 08 September 2001 12:58, jennifer wrote:
On Saturday 08 September 2001 11:56, richied wrote:
On September 8, 2001 09:42 am, Siavash Sefidvash wrote:
Apologies for sounding naive, but is not fair to get paid for your
efforts.?
...There's actually a bigger issue at stake.
Hi, I would want applications like Dreamweaver UltraDev and to a lesser
extent PhotoShop before I could comfortably abandon Windows. Someone ought
bring pressure to bare on Macromedia and thier ilk.
Another issue would be that of plug n play. If LINUX could have that and
take the headache of
13 matches
Mail list logo
